Background

Are You a Pathological Gambler? Test Yourself!

Uploaded 5/25/2023, approx. 8 minute read

In my Wayward Youth, I published a book titled Games of Fortune.

It was a survey of all games played in casinos and other gambling venues throughout the world.

It included a system to beat the roulette before it beats the S out of you.

And at the very end, there was a very unprofessional, non-rigorous, non-normatively validated, non-clinically tested test to determine whether you were a compulsive pathological gambler or whether you could ultimately make it into the exalted, rarified atmosphere and club of professional gamblers.

I spent two years in casinos and other gambling venues, private apartments, you name it, clubs, and I had observed gamblers, professionals, compulsives, obsessives, pathological gamblers, desperate people, those who do it for entertainment and those who do it for living.

And two years is a long time and I distilled all of this into the following test.

So I'm going to read the test to you, take it and see if you could one day find yourself being a pathological gambler or a pro.

So here's the test.

Answer all the questions, either yes or no.

Do not try to guess what a compulsive or pathological gambler would have answered.

Simply be honest with yourself. Tell yourself the truth.

At the end of the test, I will give you a key and using this key, you'll be able to determine to which of the two camps you belong naturally.

A compulsive, obsessive, pathological, increasingly more desperate gambler or a cold blooded, cool-headed, nerves of steel pro.

Let's then write it, ladies and gentlemen, "févos jus malcevo jus".

Number one, when you play the roulette, do you bet on the same number all the time?

Number two, if one of the numbers in the roulette comes up, does it usually come up when you did not gamble on it?

Do you have bad luck this way?

Number three, did it ever happen to you that you were absolutely certain which number is going to come up?

You told your neighbor to the left, you informed your neighbor to the right, and lo and behold, the number did come up.

Only you didn't bet on it.

Did this ever happen to you?

Therefore, every time you win in the roulette, for example, every time you win, are you sorry that you didn't gamble with a much bigger amount, that you didn't place a much bigger bet?

Number five, did you have lucky streaks, lucky evenings where everything goes your way, unceasingly, uninterruptedly, and you're on a wave, and on a streak, and you are happy, go lucky forever?

Did you have such evenings or such cases?

Number six, are you capable? Can you just stop gambling when your luck had abandoned you?

After having had a very successful evening, in which you have had a lucky streak of winnings, so are you capable of calling it a day? Are you capable of cutting, stopping, just packing your winnings and walking away? Are you capable of doing this when your luck turns and begins to betray you?

Number seven, at the blackjack table, 21, do you immediately identify the bad hands, those who screw up the table's odds by making erroneous decisions, thus helping the house, the casino? Can you immediately tell which of the players, which among them, who among them is a bad player?

Number eight, are you constantly anxious that your luck is about to turn, is about to betray you, about to be over? Are you constantly anxious?

Number nine, is the size of your bed determined by your intuition and gut feelings? Do you decide how much to place on the table based on your instincts?

Number 10, do you use any system, mathematical or otherwise, when you gamble, a mountain guy as it's called, or a mathematical system? Is your gambling structured in any way dictated by any external algorithm?

Number 11, do you usually get bad cards, or do you usually throw bed cubes?

Are you unlucky?

Can you characterize yourself as unfortunate in gambling?

Number 12, do you believe that the casino workers, casino stuff, is cheating, deceiving the gamblers?

Number 13, you've had a horrible night with a huge loss. Suddenly you're beginning to recover.

Do you retire once you have recouped all your money, once you've gone back to your initial position, once you have recovered all the principal?

Do you then call it a day and walk away?

Or do you continue to gamble?

So the question is, do you walk away?

Number 14, you're seated next to a gambling table and you're having the day of your life. Nothing goes wrong. Everything goes right. You're winning constantly. You could do nothing wrong.

And then you receive a phone call and you're invited to attend a very, very important meeting, professional business meeting.

Would you get up and attend the meeting? Or would you pre-varicate and invent some excuse or simply ignore the message?

So would you ignore the message? Would you postpone the meeting? Would you not attend the meeting?

That's the question.

Yes or no?

Number 15, once you have left the casino, once you've walked away from the gambling venue, do you always calculate in your head how much more money you could have made had you stayed?

Number 16, do you think your success in poker crucially depends on your skill, the quality of your game, how good a player you are?

Number 17, when you have a good hand in poker and you call bets or you increase your bet, do you usually lose them?

Is it a rule that once you increase your bets in poker, you lose?

Number 18, in poker, is luck much more important than skill?

Number 19, in bagammon, is luck much more important than skill?

Number 20, if your chances to hit the jackpot in a slot machine, are they higher than your chances to win a number, to bet correctly on a number and to relax?

I repeat the question.

Your chances to win to hit the jackpot on a slot machine, are they higher than your chances to correctly pick up a number at the roulette?

Number 21, are you angry at yourself for gambling? Do you dislike your gambling?

Number 22, are you angry at yourself that you don't know when to stop gambling, when to call it a day, when to back your things and go? Are you angry at yourself?

Number 23, do you think that you're entitled to win, to gain? Do you consider yourself entitled to some gains or some winnings in gambling?

Number 24, in a day that you had won, in a day that you had gained and made money, again, a gambling day, which proved to be profitable, you ended it richer than you entered it. Was this kind of day worth it? Would you have liked to have many more days like this? Was this day worth it?

Yes or no?

Okay.

If you responded positively to the following questions, then chances are that you are a compulsive, obsessive, pathological gambler or a gambler at risk with a propensity to become one.

These are the numbers, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 4, 2, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18 and 17.

If you answered in the affirmative, if your answer was yes to all these questions, then in all likelihood, you're a pathological gambler or if you pick up gambling as a habit, you're likely to become compulsive, obsessive and pathological and you're likely to lose your shirt and many other, many other possessions except your shirt.

Stay away.

I hope this has been helpful.


A reminder, it's not a recognized psychological test. It's not rigorous. It's not clinically validated or normatively validated. It's just fun. It's just my observations, encapsulates my observations in gaming halls throughout the world.

And more general advice, just stay away.

Simply stay away.

The house always has the advantage.

That's a fact.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

MMPI-2 Psychological Test: Controversial, but Hard to Fake

The MMPI-2 test booklet has 567 items, but a rough assessment can be made based on the first 370 queries. The items are arranged in scales, and the responses are compared to answers provided by control subjects. The nature of the deviation determines the patient's traits and tendencies, but not their diagnosis. The test results place the subject in a group of patients who reacted similarly, and the validity scales indicate whether the patient responded truthfully and accurately or was trying to manipulate the test. The clinical scales measure various mental health issues, and the interpretation of the MMPI-2 is now fully computerized.


PCL-R (Psychopathy Checklist Revised) Test

The Psychopathy Checklist Revised Test (PCLR) is a structured interview that is used to rate symptoms common among psychopaths in forensic populations. The test is designed to cover the major psychopathic traits and behaviors, but it has very dubious, predictive and retrodictive power. The PCLR is based on a structured interview and collateral data gathered from family, friends, and colleagues and from documents. The hope of the designers of the PCLR test is that information gathered outside the scope of a structured interview will serve to rectify any potential abuse, diagnostic bias, and manipulation by both the testee and the tester.


Psychological Tests and Structured Interviews: Introduction

Personality assessment combines both art and science, with standardized psychological tests and structured interviews designed to minimize bias and ensure objectivity. These tests often limit responses to specific formats, such as true or false, and rely on automated scoring to reduce human involvement in data gathering. However, interpretation remains crucial, and practitioners typically use multiple tests to create a coherent picture of an individual's personality, ensuring that results align across different assessments. The distinction between objective and projective tests highlights the varying levels of structure and potential bias in scoring, with projective tests relying heavily on the clinician's judgment and interpretation.


Hope for Suicide Prevention: Suicide Crisis Syndrome (SCS): Narrative-Crisis Model

Suicide is often preceded by a complex interplay of emotional states and cognitive distortions, rather than a straightforward progression from suicidal ideation to action. The proposed Suicide Crisis Syndrome (SCS) aims to provide a new diagnostic framework that recognizes suicide as a distinct mental health condition, separate from other disorders, and emphasizes the importance of understanding the narrative crisis model. Research indicates that many individuals who attempt suicide do not exhibit clear suicidal thoughts prior to their actions, challenging traditional beliefs about the relationship between ideation and behavior. The SCS framework offers a more nuanced approach to assessing and treating individuals at risk, focusing on observable symptoms and emotional states rather than relying solely on self-reported intentions.


Rorschach's Inkblot Test

The Rorschach Ink Blots Test is a diagnostic tool developed by Swiss psychiatrist Hermann Rorschach. The test uses ambiguous ink blots to provoke free associations in the test subject, and the diagnostician records the patient's responses as well as the ink blots' spatial position and orientation. The test is highly subjective and depends on the skills and training of the diagnostician and his interpretative abilities. It cannot be used to reliably diagnose patients, but it can draw attention to the patient's defenses and personal style.


Disorders of Eating and Personality (3rd International Conference on Neurology and Brain Disorders)

Eating disorders are complex and often comorbid with personality disorders, particularly borderline personality disorder. The key to improving the mental state of patients with both disorders is to focus on their eating and sleeping disorders first. By controlling their eating disorder, patients can reassert control over their lives, leading to better regulation of their sense of self-worth, enhanced self-confidence, and self-esteem. Treatment options include medication, cognitive or behavioral therapy, psychodynamic therapy, and family therapy. Recovery prognosis is good after two years of treatment and support.


Abolish Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) in DSM V?

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) is criticized for its inadequate classificatory model and diagnostic criteria, which are vague and equivocal. The DSM-5 committee proposes to abolish some personality disorders and merge them into a single diagnostic category, using a dimensional approach that reflects reality better. The DSM-5 is expected to address the longitudinal course of disorders, genetic and biological underpinnings, and effectiveness of various treatments. The DSM-5 is expected to be a significant improvement over the DSM-4 in addressing personality disorders.


Narcissist's Hypnosis And Hypnotherapy

Hypnosis is a phenomenon that remains largely unexplained, with various theories suggesting it is either a special state of mind or a people-pleasing behavior. Professor Sam Vaknin proposes that hypnosis is an extreme form of empathy, where the subject and hypnotist synchronize their minds and become one. Hypnotherapy has shown some medical value, but its efficacy in treating mental health conditions is limited. Despite the mystery surrounding hypnosis, it should be treated with respect and investigated further as a potential treatment for mental illness.


Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI): Fortune Cookie or Reliable Test?

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is a widely used and contested personality assessment test with various versions and millions of users worldwide. It is based on Jungian theory and classifies individuals into one of 16 personality types. While some studies have found the MBTI to be valid and useful, others criticize its dichotomous nature, lack of reliability, and deviation from Jung's original theory. Despite these criticisms, the MBTI remains popular and can provide insight, raise self-awareness, and help individuals understand their past experiences and relationships.


Avoid Mentally Ill: No Families, Relationships

Mentally ill people want to be normal, but it is a lie that therapists and psychologists tell them that they can be cured and lead a normal life. Mental illness is a lifelong condition that is part of a person's identity and cannot be cured or healed. Mentally ill people should be managed, regulated, and isolated to prevent them from causing harm to themselves and others. Instead of seeking normalcy and intimacy, mentally ill people should focus on their areas of high functioning and accept their limitations.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy