Background

Avoid 3 Errors in Search of Meaning in Life

Uploaded 8/25/2021, approx. 6 minute read

We all look for meaning. We all look for significance, direction. We all look for understanding and interpretation, because in the absence of some structure and some order and some pattern, there is no mental health. Depression and anxiety are the outcomes of capriciousness, arbitrariness, unpredictability, dysregulation, lack of boundaries, lack of consensus, inability to compromise, to negotiate, and to communicate.

So we all, individually and as collectives, try to impose meaning on the world, but the world resists our attempts, because the world essentially is chaotic, is random, is meaningless, is insignificant.

But the truth is that if we focus on individual meaning, the meaning not of life, but the meaning of my life, answers are there. Yet when we search for the meaning of our lives as individuals, we tend to commit three mistakes.

These mistakes are cardinal and they prevent us, prevent us from finding meaning, prevent us from imposing an organizing principle on the apartheid kaleidoscopic tsunami that we call life.

And these mistakes had been noted time and again for millennia by numerous sages, wise people of the ages, and yet we keep committing these mistakes.

I'm not quite sure why, you see, even I don't have all the answers.

But I would like to point out to you these errors. Maybe you would be the ones to avoid them for the first time in human history and you would be the ones to find meaning, at least meaning as it is confined to your life and to the lives of your nearest and dearest and loved ones, because we can't aspire for more.

We can't have the mind of God if God exists. We're finite, limited, frail, broken, damaged, fragile, vulnerable creatures. Any pretension to have insight into the mind of God is grandiosity. It's pathological. It's an element of narcissism. We can never decipher this fabric that we're embedded in. We can just try to understand our role in our own lives. We can just try to make sense of our own lives by introducing into it some structure and order as it relates to other people because meaning is always relational. Meaning comes from the inside only when it interacts with the outside.

Relationships are the fount of meaning and love is the source and foundation of relationships.

Ultimately, it's this very old message, worn out, cliched, love is it.

But there are three errors that we commit.

Number one, never choose the path. Never choose the path. Let the path choose you to claim that you know what's good for you, to assign valence, to assign some kind of meaning to events in your life, to say this thing that's happening to me is bad. This thing that's happening to me is good for me.

That is to assume the mind of God, which you do not possess will never have. That is not only pretentious, it's self-destructive. You can never know what's good for you or what's bad for you. The path chooses you. You're handled along the path by forces, connections and interconnections and interactions that are way beyond a grasp, even in principle.

When I was sent to prison, I was much younger as in my 20s, 30s. I thought the world had crashed. I thought I'd hit bottom. My wife had left me for another man. I had lost a business empire. I was left bereft all alone among seriously dangerous people in one of the worst prisons in the world.

And I thought it's the end, but it was not the end. It was the beginning. It was there in prison that I had authored Malignant Surf Love: Narcissism Revisited, the first book ever about narcissistic abuse, a book that gave light and hope and guidance to millions of people.

This could have never happened had I not gone to prison. I needed this experience.


You see, I, with my limited human mind, sincerely believed that my prison experience was the worst possible thing that could have happened to me. But in truth, it was the best thing that had ever had ever happened to me. The best by far.

You never know. You are incapable of knowing. Never choose the path. Let the path choose you. Be humble. Accept. Submit.

In certain religions, it's a tenet. For example, the word Islam means essentially submission.

Mistake number two. We have all the answers we need all the time. All of us feel that we have no answers for some reason. All of us experience this knowing sensation that our questions are unanswered, that there's an enigma out there, that it's a mystery, that we will never ever unravel and resolve, but nothing could be further from the truth.

We have all the answers we need all the time, every second of every minute of every hour of every hour of every day of every month of every year of every decade. The answers are there. All of them. All the answers.

What we lack is not the answers, but the ability to identify them as answers, the ability to discern the answers, the ability to notice the answers and the ability to adopt and embrace the answers.

This is what we lack. This is what we miss.

The answers are always there. We just need to open our eyes. We need an awakening. We need a self-induced epiphany to see the answers.

And no, the answers are not the same for everyone. There's no set of universal answers. Each of us has a set of idiosyncratic, tailor-made, custom-made answers.

But we need to notice them and to accept them, again, to humble ourselves.


The third mistake is it is wrong to seek the correct answers.

You should focus on asking the right questions. I repeat, don't seek the correct answers. Don't hunt for the correct answers.

Instead, focus on finding out, formulating and asking the right questions.

Getting the questions right yields the answers which are correct for you.

Remember, the answers are there. Getting the questions right is enlightenment. That is the path to these answers that are awaiting you.

And this is the chain of evidence, if you wish.

Ask the right questions. Get the correct answers. Find the meaning, your meaning, the meaning of your life.

Walk towards this meaning. Let the path choose you.

This is not as abstract as it sounds. For example, not focusing on answers is a very practical advice. Focus on questions.

For example, opening your eyes and realizing that the answers are out there is just a question of reframing, redefining your reality, thinking outside the box or asking a good friend to help you, to provide you with respect. Letting the path choose you is a question of humility, a question of getting rid of your vanity and grandiosity and accepting that the totality of humanity and the entirety of the universe probably have more information than you, including more information about what's good for you.

Let it be. Simply let it be.

I want to read to you something that Dalai Lama had written.

When asked what surprised him most about humanity, Dalai Lama answered this.

Man sacrifices his health in order to make money. Then he sacrifices money to recuperate his health.

And then he is so anxious about the future that he does not enjoy the present.

The result being that he does not live in the present or in the future.

He lives as if he were never going to die. He lives as if he were never going to die and then he dies having never really lived.

Dalai Lama.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Questions My (Late) Goldfish Asked Me about Meaning of Life

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the concept of meaning in life, arguing that it is subjective, arbitrary, and consensus-driven. He explores the relationship between essence, existence, and meaning, and questions whether meaning can exist without a designer. Vaknin also examines the role of context in determining meaning and encourages listeners to find their own answers to the complex and multifaceted concept of meaning.


Relationships Inauthentic, Will Always Fail (Sartre's "Being and Nothingness", SECOND LECTURE)

The lecture explores the concept of desire as a driving force in the construction of the self, emphasizing that desire is rooted in a sense of lack or absence. It critiques Sartre's notion that desire can coexist with satisfaction, arguing instead that fulfillment often leads to disappointment and a loss of desire, which is essential for motivation and happiness. The discussion also delves into the complexities of intersubjectivity, highlighting the challenges of understanding and relating to others, as well as the inherent contradictions in the quest for authenticity and freedom. Ultimately, it posits that true freedom arises from a state of nothingness, where one can transcend ego and engage with the world ethically and authentically.


Suicide: Why Choose Life, Not Death!

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the rising tide of suicidal ideation among people of all ages and cultures and provides a philosophical foundation for why people should choose life. He argues that existence is always richer in potential than non-existence and that life is full of potentials because it is complex and because of other people. He also criticizes modern society for presenting falsities, lies, manipulations, and life substitutes that limit people's promise and suppress their free will. Ultimately, he urges people to choose themselves and realize that their existence alone suffices to steer everyone and everything in another direction and towards an alternative destiny.


Free Will: Illusion or Reality?

Free will is a useful fiction that helps humans make sense of life and provides self-efficacious guidance. It is an article of faith rather than a fact or hypothesis, and has no place in modern scientific discourse. However, it is crucial for human civilization and moral responsibility. The concept of free will depends on the frame of reference and level of description, and while it may not exist from a cosmic point of view, it is a powerful organizing principle from a human perspective.


Talk That Defies a Title (Assembly of Silence Radio Hour (ASRH))

The discussion centers on the concept of nothingness as a path to authenticity, suggesting that individuals must shed societal influences and internalized expectations to discover their true selves. This process involves recognizing that much of one's identity is shaped by external factors, leading to a state of being that is free from societal impositions. The conversation also critiques modern psychology for promoting a solipsistic view of the self, which contributes to a culture of narcissism and objectification, ultimately resulting in a disconnection from genuine human relationships. The potential of artificial intelligence is presented as a hopeful avenue for overcoming these societal challenges, as it could foster new forms of collaboration and understanding beyond the limitations of human psychology.


Are You Sure You Are Human?

The lecture explores the complex question of what it means to be human, highlighting the inadequacy of circular definitions that rely on negation, such as being human because one is not an animal or a machine. It discusses the continuum between humans and other life forms, particularly in light of advancements in artificial intelligence, which may challenge traditional notions of uniqueness and personhood. The speaker emphasizes two key characteristics that may define humanity: behavioral unpredictability and awareness of mortality, while also questioning the implications of merging human and machine traits. Ultimately, the discourse reflects on the shifting perspectives of humanity in the context of science, technology, and societal changes, suggesting an ongoing struggle to define and recognize what constitutes humanness.


Vaknin to Youth: Life Sucks, You're On Your Own (Turnu Severin Intl. Conference on Psychology)

The lecture discusses the fluidity of concepts like madness and normality, emphasizing that societal definitions can shift over time, as seen in the changing perceptions of homosexuality and religious figures. It critiques the field of psychology, arguing that it lacks scientific rigor and often serves as a means of social control, leading to an inflation of mental health diagnoses. The speaker advocates for self-awareness, self-acceptance, and self-love as essential components of mental health, urging individuals to prioritize their own needs and boundaries over societal expectations. Ultimately, the message is one of empowerment, encouraging individuals to recognize their intrinsic value and navigate life with resilience and authenticity.


Reality Or Shared Fantasy Your Choice (from Best Offer To The Matrix)

The lecture explores the concept of reality versus fantasy, emphasizing that individuals often live in a dissociative state where their thoughts and emotions are not fully controlled, leading to a constructed narrative of reality. It discusses how movies like "The Best Offer," "Koma," and "The Truman Show" illustrate the complexities of human perception, choice, and the moral implications of living in a fabricated reality. The lecturer questions whether happiness derived from delusion is preferable to a painful reality, suggesting that as long as individuals are functional and not harmed, their fantasies may be valid. The discussion culminates in the philosophical implications of free will and determinism, particularly in the context of the Matrix, where the distinction between real and simulated experiences becomes blurred. Ultimately, the lecture challenges listeners to reflect on their own relationships with reality and the influence of narcissism and shared fantasies in their lives.


Chair Work Be Your Abuser, Talk To Him Her For 10 Minutes

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the concept of nothingness and suggests using chair work, a psychological technique, to better understand oneself and others. He reads excerpts from Oliver Sacks' book "The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat" and James Tiptree's "Meet Me at Infinity" to illustrate the importance of memory, identity, and self-discovery. Vaknin emphasizes the need to let go of ego and status, and to embrace empathy and understanding in order to grow and change.


Four Steps: Change Yourself to Change the World (with Assc Direct)

The guest advises people to reestablish meaningful connections with real people to combat the depersonalization and derealization caused by social media. He suggests starting small with five interactions a day and gradually building up. He also advises trusting judiciously and creating a distributed network of trust. Lastly, he recommends discarding beliefs and behaviors that are not truly one's own and focusing on the essence of oneself.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy