Background

Closure with Abusers

Uploaded 10/12/2010, approx. 3 minute read

I am Sam Vaknin, and I am the author of Malignant Self-Love, Narcissism Revisited.

For her traumatic wounds to heal, the victim of abuse requires closure.

One final interaction with her tormentor, in which he, hopefully, will acknowledge his misbehavior and even tender an apology.

Fair chance. Few abusers, especially if they are narcissistic, are amenable to such weak-link pleasantries.

More often, the abuse are left to wallow in a poisonous tool of misery, self-pity, and self-reclusion.

Depending on the severity, duration, and nature of the abuse, there are three forms of effective closure.

There is conceptual closure. This is the most common variant. It involves a frank discussion of the abusive relationship. The parties meet to analyze what went wrong, to allocate blame and guilt, to derive lessons, and to part ways cathartically cleansed.

In such an exchange, a compassionate offender, quite the oxymoron, admittedly, offers his prey the chance to rid herself of accumulating resentment. He also disabuses her of the notion that she, in any way, was guilty or responsible for her maltreatment, that it was all her fault, that she deserved to be punished, and that she could have saved a relationship.

I call it malignant optimism. With this burden gone, the victim is ready to resume her life, to seek companionship or love elsewhere.

Then there is retributive closure. When the abuse had been gratuitous, sadistic, repeated, and protracted, conceptual closure is not enough. Retribution is called for, an element of vengeance, of restorative justice, and a restored balance.

Recuperation hinges on punishing the delinquent and merciless party. The penal intervention of the law is often therapeutic to the abused.

Some victims delude themselves into believing that their abuser is experiencing guilt and conscience, which rarely is the case. They revel in his ostensible, self-inflicted torment. His sleepless nights become their sweet revenge, but it's all self-delusion.

Abuses are not like that.

Regrettably, the victim's understandable emotions often lead to abusive and illegal acts on the victim's part. Many of the tormented stalk their erstwhile abusers and take the law into their own hands.

Abuse tends to breed abuse all around, in both prey and predator.

Finally, there is dissociative closure.

Absent the other two forms of closure, the conceptual and the retributive, victims of egregious and prolonged misfeedment tend to repress their painful memories.

In extremists, they dissociate.

The dissociative identity disorder, known formally as multiple personality disorder, is thought to be such a reaction to abuse.

The harrowing experiences are sliced off, they are tucked away, and they are attributed to another person or personality.

Sometimes the victim assimilates his or her tormentor, and even openly and consciously identifies with him and emulates him. This is the narcissistic defense.

In his own anguished mind, the victim becomes omnipotent and therefore invulnerable. He or she develops a false self. The true self is thus shielded from further harm and injury by the false self.

False self is omnipotent, omniscient, nothing can hurt or pain the false self.

According to psychodynamic theories of psychopathology, repressed content rendered unconscious is the cause of all manner of mental health disorders and even psychosomatic disorders.

The victim pays a hefty price for avoiding and evading his or her predicament.

We will discuss coping with various forms of stoking in one of our future videos. Stay tuned.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Closure is Bad for You

Closure, a popular concept in psychology, originally came from Gestalt therapy and referred to image processing. However, it has been inappropriately expanded to include trauma, relationships, and more. Many experts and psychologists now consider closure a myth and even counterproductive. Instead of seeking closure, one should focus on embracing and integrating pain and negative experiences as part of personal growth and development.


Gangstalking is Real, Should be Studied (Conference Keynote Speech)

Victimhood gangstalking is a phenomenon that has emerged alongside social justice movements, where individuals self-identifying as victims collaborate against perceived perpetrators, creating a morality play of good versus evil. Gangstalking, often dismissed as delusional, can occur in various forms, including organized campaigns by individuals with personality disorders, cult-like groups, and even in institutional settings like legal systems. The dynamics of gangstalking resemble shared psychosis, where participants reinforce each other's narratives and engage in collective targeting of individuals, often leading to severe reputational and psychological harm. Acknowledging the reality of gangstalking is crucial for understanding its impact on victims and for developing appropriate psychological support and interventions.


Overprotective Parents And Manipulative Helplessness

Overprotective parents create a traumatic environment for their children by denying them access to reality and preventing them from experiencing necessary challenges and losses that foster personal growth. This overprotectiveness stems from the parents' own anxieties and insecurities, leading to a stunted development in the child, who becomes dependent and struggles with social interactions and boundaries. As adults, these children often exhibit learned helplessness and may manipulate others through feigned dependency, perpetuating a cycle of dysfunction in their relationships. Ultimately, this dynamic results in a failure to individuate and a distorted internal working model, leaving the child unable to navigate the complexities of the world independently.


Reverse Psychology CPTSD, Intermittent Reinforcement, Reactance, Strategic Self Anticonformity

Reverse psychology is a technique that involves asserting the opposite of a desired outcome to encourage someone to act in the intended way, often relying on the psychological phenomenon of reactance, where individuals resist perceived coercion. Victims of complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) may exhibit behaviors similar to those of psychopaths, including defiance and emotional dysregulation, which can be influenced by intermittent reinforcement from abusers. Techniques such as mirroring, tough love, and pseudo-humility can be employed in both interpersonal relationships and therapeutic settings to manipulate behavior and promote change. Ultimately, reverse psychology can be a powerful tool, particularly with individuals who have strong resistances or personality disorders, as it leverages their natural tendencies to react against perceived limitations on their freedom.


What Is Acting Out? (and Covert Narcissist)

Acting out is a way for individuals to discharge conflicted mental content through action, often as a result of being unable to verbalize or communicate their internal struggles. It is commonly associated with personality disorders and can lead to self-destructive behaviors. Acting out can be seen as a form of somatization, using the body to remember and process repressed memories and emotions. It is important to distinguish acting out from other concepts such as acting in, passage à l'acte, and bad behavior, as they have different implications and meanings.


How Sick Parents Destroy You (or Why I Am Childless)

Parents play a crucial role in shaping their children's mental health and overall well-being, with their behavior significantly influencing the child's development. While genetics can predispose individuals to certain mental health disorders, it is the environment created by parents that activates these predispositions. Dysfunctional parenting, characterized by neglect, abuse, or unrealistic expectations, can lead to severe psychological issues in children, including boundary violations and identity confusion. Ultimately, the intergenerational transmission of trauma and mental illness underscores the profound impact of parental mental health on the next generation.


Narcissistic Families: Pseudomutual, Pseudohostile

Dysfunctional families can be categorized into three types: indifferent, pseudo-mutual, and pseudo-hostile. Indifferent families neglect their children, leading to emotional dysregulation, while pseudo-mutual families present a facade of harmony and unconditional love, suppressing individuality and authentic expression. In contrast, pseudo-hostile families engage in constant bickering, which serves as a distraction from deeper emotional issues and power struggles. Both pseudo-mutual and pseudo-hostile dynamics create environments that hinder personal growth and self-identity, often resulting in long-lasting psychological effects on children.


Therapist Your Father, Wife Your Mother: Transference as Flashback Light

Transference involves displacing emotions and ideas from significant figures in one's past onto new relationships, such as a therapist or partner, leading to a confusion of identities. This phenomenon can perpetuate dysfunctional relational patterns and enhance the significance of new individuals beyond their actual importance, often resulting in dependency or addiction. Individuals with relational dysfunctions, such as those with certain attachment styles, are more prone to exaggerated transference, which can lead to coercive behaviors aimed at forcing new figures to conform to familiar dynamics. Ultimately, transference acts as a resistance that reenacts early experiences with the hope of achieving a resolution that rarely occurs.


Dissonances, Anxiety, and Addiction (Intl. Conference on Addiction, Psychiatry and Mental Health)

Dissonance, or inner conflict, is a powerful force that can lead to addictive, traumatic, or post-traumatic behaviors. While cognitive dissonance is widely discussed, there are many other types of dissonance, including volitional, emotional, axiological, deontic, and attitude dissonance. Dissonance can arise from conflicting thoughts, emotions, values, duties, and attitudes. When defense mechanisms fail to cope with dissonance, severe anxiety can lead to self-medication and addiction, which can engender trauma and personality pathologies such as narcissism.


From Trauma to Failed Dissociation to Psychosis

The debate in clinical psychology centers around whether psychosis and psychotic disorders should be redefined as dissociative post-traumatic conditions, with historical perspectives emphasizing their distinct nature. Childhood trauma, abuse, and adversity are identified as critical preconditions that lead to a progression of psychological defenses, starting with splitting, then dissociation, and potentially culminating in psychosis or suicide. Dissociation involves strategies such as amnesia, de-realization, and depersonalization, while psychosis represents a denial of internal reality, externalizing internal experiences as coming from outside oneself. Ultimately, both psychosis and narcissism can be seen as desperate attempts to cope with trauma, reflecting a profound struggle with internal and external realities.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy