Background

Flying Monkeys of Narcissist Zero: Language of Narcissistic Abuse

Uploaded 7/22/2023, approx. 12 minute read

Why am I so insistent on being credited for the work that I've done?

Is it because I'm a narcissist?

It's because I value history. Memory is the glue that holds all of us together, individuals and collectives.

Context, lineage, pedigree, provenance, they all provide additional information. They help us to understand things more profoundly and more accurately.

If creators, artists, authors, filmmakers, if creators are not credited, there's no incentive to create.

What would happen to humanity if people were to steal each other's ideas, each other's work, misattribute them, lie about them, plagiarize?

What would happen to humanity?

I insist on the veracity of the historical record. I insist on getting credit for my work because I want everyone else to get credit for theirs.

I want a world where people don't steal, don't lie, don't cheat.


In 1995, I was the first person in human history to the best of my knowledge. I was the first person to out himself as a narcissist. I was the first person to admit to having been diagnosed with narcissistic personality disorder.

You heard the phrase "patient zero"? I am patient zero.

I was and still am narcissist zero.

But then having confessed to my mental health diagnosis, I couldn't find anyone else to talk to.

People were shy, avoidant. They were either victims of narcissists or narcissists themselves.

So to be able to communicate my experiences, I had to coin a whole new corpus of language. And this corpus of language is still widely in use today.

Now, of course, I haven't coined all the phrases and all the words that are in use today, but I've coined the majority of the most important ones.

And when I mention this, people contest the fact. People have no memory. They have no timelines. We are living in a timeless period.

And people say, "You didn't coin no contact?" The phrase "no contact"?

"My grandma used no contact on my grandpa."

Well, of course, I didn't put the two words together. I was not the first one to use the phrase "no contact."

But no contact is a set of 27 strategies. Look it up on my channel. There's a video dedicated to no contact.

And these 27 strategies of coping with the aftermath of narcissistic abuse, I named them the collective. I named it no contact.

Listen to this short excerpt from an interview that I gave to a documentary about narcissistic abuse.

I really think it's a matter of ethics and morality. I think we're increasingly living in an amoral space which degenerates very easily, devolves very easily into immorality.

People steal from each other, troll each other, attack each other, abuse each other with impunity online.

These are the parameters, the behavioral parameters of the online space. Everything goes. It's the Wild West. There are no rules. It's a jungle out there. Hostility, enmity, hatred, anger are the coinage of this realm.

So listen to this excerpt.

About Narcissist Zero, that's me, and the language of narcissistic abuse that I was forced to coin in 1995 because there was nobody there.

For 10 years, I've had the only website on narcissism and narcissistic abuse. And I owned and moderated the only six support groups for victims of abuse.

My websites have garnered 100 million page views. And in my six support groups, there were 300,000 members. And we are talking 1997, 1999, when the internet was an embryo, a fetus, not even a newborn, an experiment.

Can you imagine the magnitude of this phenomenon?

And it has grown ever since.

Now tens of millions of people are involved in the study of narcissistic abuse, in teaching each other, sharing experiences, and so on and so forth.

I started it all.

I insist on that.

That's a historical record.

I don't insist only oncredit.

I insist on history.

I insist on memory.

I insist on rigorousness.

I insist on a pioneer status because the history of the topic is important.

It's important to understand.

It may not be an accident that a narcissist started it all and not, for example, a victim.

Why is that?

It's a fascinating question.

Behoves us to study it.

Now, how can we study it if we don't know the history or deny it when we are faced with it?

We need to stop this.

We need to develop a connection to our past, to our communities, to others.

We need to stop being atomized not only physically but also mentally.

Where have we gone with all this?

It's a world of present only, no past, no future.

So it is my personal battle, but it is part and parcel of a much bigger war, the war to regain traditions, history, memory, identity, and after all, humanity.


I wish you enjoyable listening.

No, not the Wizard of Oz.

They are not called flying monkeys.

The Wizard of Oz.

They are called winged monkeys.

The winged monkeys in the Wizard of Oz are the good guys.

They actually had Dorothy.

So no, it wasn't borrowed from them.

In 1995, I watched a National Geographic movie.

There were these monkeys and they occupied an abandoned shrine or temple or something.

They were flying all over the place.

And so it occurred to me to coin the phrase flying monkeys to describe people who aided and abet the narcissist and the psychopath by doing their bidding against targets, against victims, against, you know.

So this is how the phrase came to be.

The first time flying monkeys is mentioned, check it out, is in 1995 in my writings in connection with narcissism, of course.

The Wizard of Oz, winged monkeys.

A variety of other books and movies and cinema use the term winged monkeys, not flying monkeys.

There is an interesting history to many of the terms in use today, which I have either coined, so I coined cerebral narcissist, somatic narcissist, knock on tar, etc., etc. or phrases that I borrowed.

Yeah, I simply borrowed these phrases and I infused them with a new meaning.

So for example, narcissistic supply is not a phrase that I coined.

It was first, I think it was 1937, the first time it was used.

And what I did, I took it and I imbued it with a new meaning.

I applied it to narcissism, I divided it to primary and secondary and so on and so forth.

The original term, the original phrase, not 1937, had to do with the relationships between parents and children only.

And it had nothing to do with narcissistic pathology.

It had to do with the normal process of growing up in a family, interactions between children and parents.

And so on and so forth.

Narcissistic abuse, yeah.

Yeah, there was the name of the first support group ever for victims of narcissism in 1997.

It was the first support group ever.

For a period of 10 years, I owned and moderated and so on and so forth all six groups of support to victims of narcissism.

I again, I borrowed the term narcissistic abuse at the early 1990s.

You could say I coined it, because it was not used anywhere.

And then I adopted this phrase to reflect its current meaning.

So yeah, I borrowed many things.

I borrowed false self from Winnicott.

I borrowed idealization, devaluation, and I added to it, by the way, I added to it discard and replacement.

So it was a hectic period within one year, 1995, I coined dozens of phrases.

And the vast majority of these phrases are still in use today.

There have been people who tried to sublimate these phrases, replace them with other phrases, replace them with other phrases.

It didn't catch on really. It didn't catch on.

Most recently, I've coined, I'm again, coining new phrases, for example, dual mothership.

I took the Sanger's concept of shared fantasy and I applied it to narcissism in a totally new way. Cold empathy. Cold empathy, yeah.

Snapshotting. These are all new phrases that I came up with.

And again, they're spreading. They're spreading like fire.

So I suspect that in 25 years time, I'll be having a similar conversation and having to convince people that I'm the guy who coined snapshotting. Or so on and so forth.

It's not very important to me, but I think it's a virtuous and moral and ethical thing to give credit where it is due.

And plagiarism is intellectual murder, stealing someone else's work and ideas and passing them off as yours. That's murder. That's intellectual murder.

First degree.

Yeah.

And many people are doing this.

And in today's world, there's no concept of time and progression and people are totally confused who coined what, who invented what, who said what and so on and so forth.

It was the same in periods of great intellectual ferment. There was the same situations.

For example, Freud borrowed many terms from others, including Adler. He borrowed a lot from Adler. Jung borrowed from Freud.

And today many things are attributed to Freud, which actually, actually there were Jungian things. Jung came up with this, not Freud. And many things are attributed to Freud that were actually Adlerian. Adler came up with these things, not Freud.

And vice versa. Many things are attributed to Jung that were actually Freud's, not Jung's. So there's a mess. There's a big mess in terms of crediting people with their work.

People deserve credit for their work. I don't think there's vanity. I don't think there's hubris. I don't think it's grandiosity. I don't think it's narcissism.

If you, is it narcissism to say that this child is your daughter? It's not. It's just that you want to claim motherhood over her. She's your child. And that's the way I see it. I don't see anything wrong with it.

And I'll continue to insist on what's mine or what's rightfully mine.

I didn't coin all the phrases. I didn't coin all the words, not by far.

But many, many obscure things that you wouldn't believe came from me.

Narcissistic fleas. You heard of that?

Mine, also.

Even the term fuel comes from my work.

So it's important to recognize paternity, provenance, the degree, and to trace an intellectual lineage because influences, intellectual influences are critical to understanding the context, the background, and the meaning, simply the meaning of text.

And today we are missing this. We're in a timeless, contextless world. There's no time. There's no context. Everything is frozen. Everything is at present. There's no background, no depth, no memory, no nothing. This is bad. This is really bad. It's supposed to be the end of civilization. Civilization relies on time and memory. And we have sacrificed both for the instant gratification of the moment, the likes on Instagram.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Racism and Stereotypes: Useful or Bad? Blacks, Jews, Gay, Women, and Other Cats

Stereotypes can be seen as a way to encapsulate information compactly and efficiently, providing a survival value in an age of information overload. While many stereotypes are self-reinforcing and can lead to discrimination, not all stereotypes are negative. Stereotypes can evolve to reflect changing societal roles and values, and can promote understanding of social and historical processes. As long as people think in terms of groups, stereotypes will exist, and they can be useful if they are based in reality and acknowledge diversity.


Giftedness or Self? (with Katja Ujčič)

Gifted individuals often experience a disconnect between their cognitive abilities and their sense of self, leading to feelings of alienation and dissonance. The education system currently favors average individuals, neglecting the unique needs of gifted people, which could be addressed by creating tailored educational environments. There is a misconception that giftedness correlates with moral goodness, but gifted individuals can exhibit a wide range of moral behaviors, and their contributions to society can be both positive and negative. Ultimately, the societal stigmatization of giftedness and the elevation of mediocrity pose significant challenges for gifted individuals, making it crucial to foster communities where they can thrive and feel accepted.


Slacker Narcissists: Indolence as Ideology

Success is often perceived as achievable through hard work, talent, and education, but this notion is challenged by the idea that social mobility is largely determined by one's family background and luck. The character Vautrin from Balzac's "Père Goriot" argues that marrying into wealth is a more effective path to success than traditional means, a sentiment echoed by modern studies indicating that most successful individuals come from affluent families. The lecture also explores the concept of narcissism, highlighting two types: the indolent narcissist who rejects work as a principle and the driven narcissist who equates hard work with personal worth, both of which reflect a broader societal trend towards shortcuts and entitlement. Ultimately, the discussion critiques the glorification of scams and shortcuts in contemporary culture, suggesting that these attitudes undermine the value of hard work and ethical behavior.


Nature vs. Nurture? BOTH

The debate between nature and nurture is a false dichotomy, as genes and the external environment interact in a unitary system that shapes human development. Genes are responsive to external influences, and this interaction creates a continuous feedback loop that affects both internal and external environments. The artificial distinctions between internal and external, or natural and artificial, hinder our understanding of the complex mechanisms that shape human identity and behavior. Recognizing the interconnectedness of all elements is essential for effective psychological practice and understanding the human experience.


Our Public "Intellectuals": Avarice, Malice, Grandiosity

Public intellectuals are not teaching people how to develop empathy, compassion, care, and love towards their fellow beings. Instead, they are teaching people how to make maximal use of their natural endowments and to fake, lie, and pretend to obtain whatever they can for themselves. The view of public intellectuals today is that the world is a win-lose situation, and they are not different from Donald Trump's jungle, Darwinian view of the world.


Topsy-turvy: Paul Bloom Against, Vaknin for Empathy (Vaknin and Rutsch)

Empathy is often viewed as a panacea for social and cultural issues, but this perspective can be naive, as it overlooks the complexities of human emotions and interactions. The distinction between individual and institutional empathy is crucial; while individual empathy can be biased and limited, institutional empathy can be more rational and inclusive, taking into account broader societal needs. Misguided empathy, particularly from NGOs, can lead to harmful outcomes when it imposes external values without understanding local contexts, reflecting a form of narcissism rather than genuine compassion. Ultimately, empathy should be seen as a nuanced and multifaceted experience, not merely a tool for policy or a measure of charitable giving.


The Rich Have You BRAINWASHED: Capitalism is a Zero-sum Game, They WIN, YOU LOSE

Capitalism operates as a zero-sum game, where the rich disproportionately benefit while the poor remain stagnant or worsen in their economic status. Despite the illusion of growth in the economy, social mobility in the United States is low, and wealth is primarily inherited rather than earned. The mechanisms of taxation and inflation serve to transfer wealth from the poor to the rich, further entrenching inequality. Ultimately, the system is rigged to favor the wealthy, leading to a cycle of exploitation and scarcity that the elites perpetuate to maintain their power.


Fascism is Political Malignant Narcissism (Brussels Morning)

The discussion centers on the characterization of Donald Trump as a fascist, drawing parallels between his rhetoric and historical fascist ideologies. Key points include the examination of fascism's inherent contradictions, such as the tension between individualism and collectivism, and the exclusionary nature of its progress narrative, which often targets specific groups as undesirable. The lecture argues that Trump's political style embodies these fascist traits, aligning him with a broader trend of populist leaders who exploit democratic systems to gain power. Ultimately, the conclusion is that Trump exemplifies fascism rather than merely being a proto-fascist.


Four Pillars of Self-love

Self-love involves having a realistic and healthy view of oneself, contrasting with the grandiosity of narcissism or the self-deprecation of others. It requires three tests: a realistic self-assessment, the pursuit of happiness, and the pursuit of favorable outcomes. Four conditions must be met for healthy self-love: self-awareness, self-acceptance, self-trust, and self-efficacy, each building upon the previous one. Ultimately, self-love is essential for survival and well-being, guiding individuals toward happiness and effective decision-making.


3 Signs You're Mentally Healthy (Bad, Good, Idealized Objects)

Mentally healthy individuals exhibit impulse control, self-awareness, and a commitment to minimizing harm to themselves and others. They are able to manage their urges and understand the consequences of their actions, while mentally ill individuals often struggle with impulse control and lack self-awareness. Additionally, mentally healthy people possess a "good object" internalized voice that affirms their worth, contrasting with the "bad object" or "idealized object" that can lead to dysfunction and mental health issues. Ultimately, mental health is rooted in the presence of a realistic and supportive internal narrative that fosters resilience and accountability.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy