Background

Flying Monkeys of Narcissist Zero: Language of Narcissistic Abuse

Uploaded 7/22/2023, approx. 12 minute read

Why am I so insistent on being credited for the work that I've done?

Is it because I'm a narcissist?

It's because I value history. Memory is the glue that holds all of us together, individuals and collectives.

Context, lineage, pedigree, provenance, they all provide additional information. They help us to understand things more profoundly and more accurately.

If creators, artists, authors, filmmakers, if creators are not credited, there's no incentive to create.

What would happen to humanity if people were to steal each other's ideas, each other's work, misattribute them, lie about them, plagiarize?

What would happen to humanity?

I insist on the veracity of the historical record. I insist on getting credit for my work because I want everyone else to get credit for theirs.

I want a world where people don't steal, don't lie, don't cheat.


In 1995, I was the first person in human history to the best of my knowledge. I was the first person to out himself as a narcissist. I was the first person to admit to having been diagnosed with narcissistic personality disorder.

You heard the phrase "patient zero"? I am patient zero.

I was and still am narcissist zero.

But then having confessed to my mental health diagnosis, I couldn't find anyone else to talk to.

People were shy, avoidant. They were either victims of narcissists or narcissists themselves.

So to be able to communicate my experiences, I had to coin a whole new corpus of language. And this corpus of language is still widely in use today.

Now, of course, I haven't coined all the phrases and all the words that are in use today, but I've coined the majority of the most important ones.

And when I mention this, people contest the fact. People have no memory. They have no timelines. We are living in a timeless period.

And people say, "You didn't coin no contact?" The phrase "no contact"?

"My grandma used no contact on my grandpa."

Well, of course, I didn't put the two words together. I was not the first one to use the phrase "no contact."

But no contact is a set of 27 strategies. Look it up on my channel. There's a video dedicated to no contact.

And these 27 strategies of coping with the aftermath of narcissistic abuse, I named them the collective. I named it no contact.

Listen to this short excerpt from an interview that I gave to a documentary about narcissistic abuse.

I really think it's a matter of ethics and morality. I think we're increasingly living in an amoral space which degenerates very easily, devolves very easily into immorality.

People steal from each other, troll each other, attack each other, abuse each other with impunity online.

These are the parameters, the behavioral parameters of the online space. Everything goes. It's the Wild West. There are no rules. It's a jungle out there. Hostility, enmity, hatred, anger are the coinage of this realm.

So listen to this excerpt.

About Narcissist Zero, that's me, and the language of narcissistic abuse that I was forced to coin in 1995 because there was nobody there.

For 10 years, I've had the only website on narcissism and narcissistic abuse. And I owned and moderated the only six support groups for victims of abuse.

My websites have garnered 100 million page views. And in my six support groups, there were 300,000 members. And we are talking 1997, 1999, when the internet was an embryo, a fetus, not even a newborn, an experiment.

Can you imagine the magnitude of this phenomenon?

And it has grown ever since.

Now tens of millions of people are involved in the study of narcissistic abuse, in teaching each other, sharing experiences, and so on and so forth.

I started it all.

I insist on that.

That's a historical record.

I don't insist only oncredit.

I insist on history.

I insist on memory.

I insist on rigorousness.

I insist on a pioneer status because the history of the topic is important.

It's important to understand.

It may not be an accident that a narcissist started it all and not, for example, a victim.

Why is that?

It's a fascinating question.

Behoves us to study it.

Now, how can we study it if we don't know the history or deny it when we are faced with it?

We need to stop this.

We need to develop a connection to our past, to our communities, to others.

We need to stop being atomized not only physically but also mentally.

Where have we gone with all this?

It's a world of present only, no past, no future.

So it is my personal battle, but it is part and parcel of a much bigger war, the war to regain traditions, history, memory, identity, and after all, humanity.


I wish you enjoyable listening.

No, not the Wizard of Oz.

They are not called flying monkeys.

The Wizard of Oz.

They are called winged monkeys.

The winged monkeys in the Wizard of Oz are the good guys.

They actually had Dorothy.

So no, it wasn't borrowed from them.

In 1995, I watched a National Geographic movie.

There were these monkeys and they occupied an abandoned shrine or temple or something.

They were flying all over the place.

And so it occurred to me to coin the phrase flying monkeys to describe people who aided and abet the narcissist and the psychopath by doing their bidding against targets, against victims, against, you know.

So this is how the phrase came to be.

The first time flying monkeys is mentioned, check it out, is in 1995 in my writings in connection with narcissism, of course.

The Wizard of Oz, winged monkeys.

A variety of other books and movies and cinema use the term winged monkeys, not flying monkeys.

There is an interesting history to many of the terms in use today, which I have either coined, so I coined cerebral narcissist, somatic narcissist, knock on tar, etc., etc. or phrases that I borrowed.

Yeah, I simply borrowed these phrases and I infused them with a new meaning.

So for example, narcissistic supply is not a phrase that I coined.

It was first, I think it was 1937, the first time it was used.

And what I did, I took it and I imbued it with a new meaning.

I applied it to narcissism, I divided it to primary and secondary and so on and so forth.

The original term, the original phrase, not 1937, had to do with the relationships between parents and children only.

And it had nothing to do with narcissistic pathology.

It had to do with the normal process of growing up in a family, interactions between children and parents.

And so on and so forth.

Narcissistic abuse, yeah.

Yeah, there was the name of the first support group ever for victims of narcissism in 1997.

It was the first support group ever.

For a period of 10 years, I owned and moderated and so on and so forth all six groups of support to victims of narcissism.

I again, I borrowed the term narcissistic abuse at the early 1990s.

You could say I coined it, because it was not used anywhere.

And then I adopted this phrase to reflect its current meaning.

So yeah, I borrowed many things.

I borrowed false self from Winnicott.

I borrowed idealization, devaluation, and I added to it, by the way, I added to it discard and replacement.

So it was a hectic period within one year, 1995, I coined dozens of phrases.

And the vast majority of these phrases are still in use today.

There have been people who tried to sublimate these phrases, replace them with other phrases, replace them with other phrases.

It didn't catch on really. It didn't catch on.

Most recently, I've coined, I'm again, coining new phrases, for example, dual mothership.

I took the Sanger's concept of shared fantasy and I applied it to narcissism in a totally new way. Cold empathy. Cold empathy, yeah.

Snapshotting. These are all new phrases that I came up with.

And again, they're spreading. They're spreading like fire.

So I suspect that in 25 years time, I'll be having a similar conversation and having to convince people that I'm the guy who coined snapshotting. Or so on and so forth.

It's not very important to me, but I think it's a virtuous and moral and ethical thing to give credit where it is due.

And plagiarism is intellectual murder, stealing someone else's work and ideas and passing them off as yours. That's murder. That's intellectual murder.

First degree.

Yeah.

And many people are doing this.

And in today's world, there's no concept of time and progression and people are totally confused who coined what, who invented what, who said what and so on and so forth.

It was the same in periods of great intellectual ferment. There was the same situations.

For example, Freud borrowed many terms from others, including Adler. He borrowed a lot from Adler. Jung borrowed from Freud.

And today many things are attributed to Freud, which actually, actually there were Jungian things. Jung came up with this, not Freud. And many things are attributed to Freud that were actually Adlerian. Adler came up with these things, not Freud.

And vice versa. Many things are attributed to Jung that were actually Freud's, not Jung's. So there's a mess. There's a big mess in terms of crediting people with their work.

People deserve credit for their work. I don't think there's vanity. I don't think there's hubris. I don't think it's grandiosity. I don't think it's narcissism.

If you, is it narcissism to say that this child is your daughter? It's not. It's just that you want to claim motherhood over her. She's your child. And that's the way I see it. I don't see anything wrong with it.

And I'll continue to insist on what's mine or what's rightfully mine.

I didn't coin all the phrases. I didn't coin all the words, not by far.

But many, many obscure things that you wouldn't believe came from me.

Narcissistic fleas. You heard of that?

Mine, also.

Even the term fuel comes from my work.

So it's important to recognize paternity, provenance, the degree, and to trace an intellectual lineage because influences, intellectual influences are critical to understanding the context, the background, and the meaning, simply the meaning of text.

And today we are missing this. We're in a timeless, contextless world. There's no time. There's no context. Everything is frozen. Everything is at present. There's no background, no depth, no memory, no nothing. This is bad. This is really bad. It's supposed to be the end of civilization. Civilization relies on time and memory. And we have sacrificed both for the instant gratification of the moment, the likes on Instagram.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Push Narcissist’s 4 Secret Buttons: Gamma Man or Agent of Chaos, Madness?

The lecture discusses the four key psychological buttons of narcissists: the precocious child, the conquering hero, the father guru, and divinity, each representing different aspects of the narcissist's identity and behavior. These buttons can be manipulated in two ways: to maintain a relationship or to facilitate a breakup, with specific strategies for each button. The speaker emphasizes that narcissism is a complex and pervasive personality construct, not merely a collection of behaviors, and highlights the chaos and discomfort that narcissists introduce into relationships. Additionally, the concept of the gamma male is introduced as a non-clinical classification that aligns with certain traits of cerebral narcissists, illustrating the broader spectrum of narcissistic behaviors.


Narcissism, Demonic Possession as Morality Plays

The lecture explores the historical and linguistic connections between demon possession and narcissism, suggesting that both concepts serve as metaphors for psychological states rather than actual entities. It argues that the language used to describe mental illness has evolved from demonology to modern psychiatric terms, yet the underlying experiences of dissociation, loss of control, and distorted perceptions remain similar. The narcissist is portrayed as a person whose true self is overshadowed by a false self, leading to a disconnection from reality and a sense of being controlled by external forces, akin to demonic possession. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the need for a deeper understanding of these psychological phenomena, emphasizing the importance of recognizing mental health issues rather than attributing them to supernatural causes.


ADHD, Autism, Narcissism: No Empathy in Dead Mother Triad

The lecture explores the intricate connections between ADHD, autism, and narcissism, suggesting that these conditions may share common developmental roots linked to dysfunctional parenting, particularly the absence of a nurturing primary caregiver. Children who experience neglect or emotional unavailability from their mothers may struggle to develop attention skills, leading to attention deficits and hyperactivity as compensatory mechanisms for gaining attention. The inability to form healthy attachments and develop empathy can result in narcissistic traits, as these children learn to navigate their emotional worlds without the necessary social feedback. The discussion emphasizes that the lack of empathy and attention regulation can perpetuate a cycle of dysfunction, making it challenging for individuals to form meaningful relationships and understand others' mental states. Ultimately, the lecture posits that these psychological issues are interrelated and stem from early childhood experiences that hinder emotional and social development.


Narcissism Sucks? Fix It! (with Assc Direct)

The discussion highlights the pervasive impact of social media on individual identity and mental health, emphasizing that technology is designed to condition and addict users, leading to increased rates of anxiety, depression, and a decline in meaningful relationships. It argues that social media fosters a culture of superficiality, where individuals prioritize attention and validation over genuine connections, resulting in a two-dimensional existence. The conversation also critiques the rise of narcissism and victimhood in society, suggesting that many self-identified victims may actually exhibit narcissistic traits themselves, perpetuating a cycle of dependency and manipulation. Ultimately, the advice centers on reconnecting with real human interactions, establishing a network of trust, and cultivating authenticity by discarding external influences that do not reflect one's true self.


Competitive Victimhood: Dark Triad ADHD Activists ( Literature Review)

Meaningful public discourse has been undermined by victimhood movements and identity politics, leading to a culture of fear where individuals are hesitant to express dissenting opinions. Many social activists are characterized as having dark triad personality traits, which include narcissism and psychopathy, allowing them to manipulate the narrative of victimhood for personal gain. This competitive victimhood has become a pervasive phenomenon, where individuals vie for recognition as the "greatest victim," often justifying immoral actions in the name of justice. The rise of victimhood as a dominant identity has resulted in a societal shift where moral accountability is diminished, and those claiming victim status feel entitled to act without reproach. This situation poses a significant threat to social cohesion and could lead to severe societal consequences if left unchallenged.


Why Do You Trust Learn To Trust Again! ( Bonus Rant)

The lecture discusses the complexities of trust, particularly in the context of narcissism and societal attitudes towards expertise. It emphasizes the importance of discerning true friends from fake ones, highlighting that genuine relationships are built on mutual respect and accountability, while fake friendships often revolve around self-interest. The speaker argues that trust is a biological urge essential for survival, yet it must be tempered with caution and tested over time to ensure its validity. Ultimately, the lecture advocates for a balanced approach to trust, encouraging individuals to embrace it while remaining vigilant and discerning in their relationships.


Narcissism’s Enemies: God, Work, Family (Prophets of Narcissism: Christopher Lasch, 1979, (lecture)

The lecture discusses the concept of narcissism as a societal shift from substance to appearance, particularly in the context of Christopher Lasch's work, "The Culture of Narcissism." It highlights how Lasch identified a self-absorbed society driven by consumerism and the need for approval, suggesting that this narcissism has become an organizing principle of modern civilization. The lecture critiques Lasch's understanding of capitalism and his inconsistent arguments, pointing out that his views often lack engagement with empirical realities and historical outcomes. Ultimately, it positions Lasch as a figure embodying the very narcissism he critiques, while also foreshadowing a discussion of contrasting intellectual perspectives in future lectures.


lovebombinggroomingLove Bombing and Grooming: In Crosshairs of Narcissists, Sadists, Psychopaths

The lecture explores the parallels between demon possession and narcissism, suggesting that both concepts serve as metaphors for psychological states rather than actual entities. It argues that terms like "demons," "ego," and "superego" are linguistic constructs used to describe complex human behaviors and experiences, with historical roots in the way societies have understood mental illness. The speaker posits that narcissists, much like those described as demonically possessed, experience a profound disconnection from their true selves, leading to a life characterized by detachment and a lack of genuine emotional engagement. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the need for a nuanced understanding of these phenomena, emphasizing the cultural and psychological contexts that shape our interpretations of both mental health and supernatural beliefs.


Are Fathers Needed? Mothers Are, For Sure!

The lecture argues that fathers are largely not needed for raising healthy and functional children, as evidenced by the prevalence of single-parent households, primarily led by mothers, which often produce well-adjusted children. Research indicates that children from single-parent families report similar or even better well-being compared to those from two-parent families, challenging the traditional view that father absence negatively impacts child development. The speaker emphasizes that the mother's role is critical, and the effects of father absence are often mediated by the mother's behavior and the family's socioeconomic context rather than the mere presence or absence of a father. Overall, the lecture suggests that the narrative surrounding the necessity of fathers in child-rearing is overly simplistic and culturally biased, with emerging studies supporting the idea that maternal qualities and external factors play a more significant role in children's outcomes.


Our Public "Intellectuals": Avarice, Malice, Grandiosity

Public intellectuals are not teaching people how to develop empathy, compassion, care, and love towards their fellow beings. Instead, they are teaching people how to make maximal use of their natural endowments and to fake, lie, and pretend to obtain whatever they can for themselves. The view of public intellectuals today is that the world is a win-lose situation, and they are not different from Donald Trump's jungle, Darwinian view of the world.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy