Background

From Trauma to Failed Dissociation to Psychosis

Uploaded 6/2/2024, approx. 17 minute read

I'm a professor of clinical psychology and in my profession there is a raging debate.

Should we redefine psychosis and psychotic disorders as dissociative post-traumatic conditions? Or not?

History militates against this.

Psychosis is one of the first mental health disorders described in literature well over 150 years ago. And throughout this period, it has been conceptualized and reconceptualized as something totally separate from dissociation.

Actually, many of the main theoreticians of psychosis refuse to acknowledge the very existence of dissociation and dissociative processes.

So as you can see, it's a war, as bad as the war between Israel and Hamas, only without the compassion and empathy. This is academia for you.

What I want to do today is in my typical immodest fashion to propose a framework which could reconcile the two camps in a two-state solution.


And here we go.

But first we have to define the boundary conditions, the opening parameters.

Nothing happens without childhood abuse, adversity, and trauma. This is known as adverse childhood experiences, ACEs.

Now abuse, trauma, adversity, that's a very open field there's the classical forms of sexual abuse physical abuse verbal abuse psychological abuse we're all acquainted with those they feature in the media in movies and so forth.

But there are many other pernicious, subterranean, stealthy forms of abuse.

For example, instrumentalizing the child, using the child to accomplish the parents' dreams, to realize them.

For example, parentifying, when the child is forced to act as a parent to the parent, pedestalizing and idolizing the child, thereby denying the childaccess to reality and to peers, being overprotective, spoiling, pampering, any breach of the child's boundaries, not allowing the child to separate and to become an individual.

All these are forms of abuse and trauma.

And those are the active forms.

We have many passive forms.

For example, abandonment, neglect, rejection, indifference, these are all forms of abuse.

Even when the child is forced to witness violent events, it's a form of abuse and it creates trauma.

To summarize this part, it is extremely, extremely easy to traumatize a child.

And you need to be ultra careful and to walk on your eggshells and on your toes as a parent in order to not traumatize a child.

Children are very delicate creatures with minimal defenses, if any, and they are becoming, they're in the process of formation.

That's why we call the early years, formative years, because the child is being formed and molded and shaped, and it's very, very easy to disrupt the process.

So, childhood, trauma, adversity, and abuse. These are the preconditions for what I'm about to discuss.


How do children react to prolonged, protracted, regular trauma and abuse which last for years? How do they react?

There is a cascade. There is a progression of reactions, starting with splitting through dissociation and into psychosis.

I call it the failure cascade or the progression cascade.

All children start by splitting they divide the world intoall bad and all good.

Mami, the maternal figure, the first person who cares for the child, mommy is automatically divided to good mommy and bad mommy.

Bad mommy is a mommy who frustrates the child, doesn't cater to the child's needs. The mummy who leaves the room when the child cries doesn't change the child's diapers on time. That's a bad mummy.

Of course, a bad mummy is intolerable. It's threatening because if your mommy is bad, you are liable to end up as a dead baby.

So what children do, they internalize bad mommy. They absorb bad mommy. And they idealize mother. Mother becomes all good and the child temporarily becomes all bad.

Now, if the trauma is extensive, if the abuse is all pervasive, if the adversity is ubiquitous, if there's no escape and no sanctuary and no refuge and respite, then the child remains stuck in the splitting stage. Remains stuck in the splitting stage and the splitting becomes a post-traumatic defense.

In order to avoid the trauma, the child devalues itself. The child internalizes a bad object. The child develops a constellation of voices or introjects that keep informing the child that he is unlovable, unworthy, inadequate, ugly, stupid, in short, deserving of mother's misconduct and misbehavior. The child had it coming.

And so the child develops enormous guilt and even bigger shame in this process.

At some point, the guilt and shame are so dangerous, so life-threatening that they are dissociated, they're buried deep inside.

And so this is the stage where there is a transition from splitting to dissociation.

Splitting is the first line of defense against trauma and abuse, and it usually doesn't hold too well because the child is liable to develop emotions or affects which threaten the child's survival. The shame is so overwhelming, so disregulated, so life-threatening that the child would rather pretend that there is no shame.

Now when you pretend that there is not, that something that exists does not exist, that's a great definition of dissociation.

Dissociation, as we shall see, is comprised of a variety of techniques, all of them intended essentially to deny reality.

So this is the second phase. Dissociation is a defense against trauma.


Now there are three ways to defend against trauma dissociatively.

And by the way, the word is not disation. Many self-styled experts online use the word disassociation. It's wrong. There's not such word. The word is dissociation.

So dissociation has three components, three tactics, three strategies of coping with the unbearable, with the intolerable, with the ominous, and with the inescapable.

The first tactic is to simply forget the traumatic events. Forget, slice them off, pretend they've never happened. Delete all records, erase the file, nothing, nada.

So forgetting the traumatic events. This is known as amnesia, or more technically, clinically speaking, retrograde amnesia.

The second tactic is to deny that external reality is external. To say, this all is happening in my head. This is not real. None of it is real. The abuse, the trauma, the adversity, the neglect, the beatings, the hatred, the sex, none of it is real. It's all happening in my head. I can pretend that none of this has happened or is happening.

And this is known as de-realization when the child pretends that, and later the adult pretends that reality is not real. It's a tactic of dissociation.

And the third tactic in dissociation is to blur, to eliminate the boundary between self and world, between external and internal.

So the inner landscape, the psyche, become indistinguishable from reality, from the world out there, from the universe. The boundary is eliminated, erased.

And so this is a third tactic.

And one of our manifestations of this tactic is to deny one's existence.

So the child says, something is happening here, but it's not happening to me.

The abuse, the trauma, the adversity, the incest, the beatings, the breaching of my boundaries, the emotional blackmail, the emotional incest, all these things are happening. The child accepts the reality of these behaviors or misbehaviors, of these events. The child does not reject reality, but the child removes itself from reality by denying his or her own existence within the traumatic setting.

The child says, this is happening, but I'm not here. This may be my body, but it's not me. This may be occurring, but I'm far removed. I am not a part of this.

And so this is known as depersonalization.


Let us summarize the three strategies.

To forget that the events have happened, and so this is known as amnesia.

To pretend that the events haven't happened in reality, but only in your mind. That is de-realization. And to acknowledge that the events have happened, but not to you. And this is depersonalization. Now, as you can see, all three strategies are very convoluted. They require a lot of self-deception, a lot of energy. You need to fend off countervailing information from reality, you need to filter out information from reality that contradicts or challenges or undermines the dissociative defenses.

In short, dissociation is a lot of hard work. And that is precisely why it sometimes fails.

Now you remember, we are talking about the failure cascade, the progression cascade, starts with splitting.

When splitting fails, move on to dissociation. When dissociation fails, there are only two options left.

One is psychosis, and one is suicide.

Now let's start with psychosis.

When dissociation fails, as you recall, one of the main features of dissociation is the blurring, the elimination of the boundary between self and world, between external and internal. So when dissociation fails, this particular strategy of dissociation undergoes a malignant transformation. Rather than deny external reality, de-realization, there is a denial of internal reality. In psychosis, the psychotic denies internal reality.

Let us be clear. The psychotic does not deny external reality. He accepts it. He is aware of it. He acknowledges it. He senses it. There's nothing wrong as far as sensory input, except for hallucinations, which we will discuss in a minute. But generally speaking, the psychotic is well embedded in reality. But the psychotic denies the existence of his or her internal reality. What the psychotic does, the psychotic externalizes internal reality. The psychotic says, this is not happening to me. This is happening outside me. These voices that are talking to me, they are not my voices, even if I experience them inside my mind internally. They're not my voices. They are someone else's voices, God's voice, my neighbor's voice. They're not my voice.

This denial of ownership of internal processes, this is at the core of psychosis. So whereas in dissociation, the dissociative person denies his or her existence in the traumatic event, the dissociative person denies his or her existence in the traumatic event. The dissociative or dissociated person denies his or her presence in the abuse, in the trauma. The psychotic does not deny it. He simply says, I don't exist as an internalized or in inner entity. Everything that's happening that allegedly is happening in my mind is actually happening outside or coming from the outside as an external source. So in dissociation, the blaring or elimination of the boundary between self and world, between external and internal has to do with the removal of the mind from the sin. The dissociative person says, this is happening, but not to me, because I'm not there. I'm not there. I'm far away. The psychotic also blurs the boundary between self and world, between external and internal, but the psychotic says, this, everything in my mind, the voices that talk to me, the images, the visuals I see, the sounds I hear, the smells I smell, all these are actually coming from the outside. They are external. They are not in my mind. My mind is here.

The psychotic does not deny that his or her mind are there. Unlike the dissociated person, the psychotic does not pretend that he is not on the scene.

Psychotic says, of course I'm here. Of course I'm here.

But everything that's happening inside my mind is not happening inside my mind. It's actually happening outside me. He externalizes, or if you wish, outsources is internal reality. Now, in psychosis, exactly like dissociation. They are dissociated or dissociative internal voices. Voices are very critical in psychosis, in dissociation, and these voices, they are introjects. There are voices of significant figures and role models in the patient's life, mother, father, teachers, authority figures, influential peers, and so on so forth.

So both the psychotic and the dissociated person have to cope with a panoply, a multitude of voices, introjects that are out of control, interjects that keep talking to them, keep attacking them, usually. Usually these voices are harshly critical and very dangerous to survival. And they're a key feature of dissociation and psychosis.

One reason to reconceive of psychosis as a form of mutated dissociation, a subspecies of dissociation.

So these voices, these introjaze, the dissociated person perceives them as authentic. The dissociated person owns these voices. He acknowledges that these voices are internal.

While the psychotic denies the internality of these voices, even when he perceives them as internal, he claims that they have come from the outside. Psychotic externalizes everything.

Now, this dissociated aspect of psychosis, the fact that psychosis is simply an escalation of dissociation is common in many, many mental health issues, pathologies and disorders.


Consider, for example, bizarre and non-bizarre delusions, including paranoia, persecutory delusions, referential ideation, erotomania, and grandiosity.

In all these cases, in all these instances of delusional disorders, there is an internal voice. The voice can be explicit or the voice can be implicit, a hidden text. But this voice falsifies reality somehow.

These delusions, these convictions that are not amenable to any modification with new information. The delusions are resistant to learning and to change. You can't convince a delusional person that his delusion is a delusion as simple as that.

And why is that? Because the delusion is perceived as external, not internal. The delusion is confused with reality. This is a psychotic feature.

Delusions are psychotic in nature, which is a confusion between internal and external.

Also, for example, in narcissism, in dissociative identity disorder, in cases of identity confusion, in cases of identity alteration, in flashbacks during post-traumatic stress disorder, in all these cases, there is a massive confusion between memory and reality, for example, in flashbacks, between reality and internal reality, for example, in flashbacks, between reality and internal reality, for example, in narcissism and in classic psychosis, etc.

The boundary between self and world is demolished. And from that moment on, it's very difficult for the individual to tell where he stops and the world starts. Where the world stops and she starts. There are no boundaries there.

And so it's a form of desperate attempt to cope with trauma and abuse, because if you claim to not have an internal reality, how could you experience pain? By denying internal reality, the psychotic person avoids the experience of pain, of hurt, and of trauma.

Because only someone who has an internal world, an internal model, only someone with an interiority, only someone with an internal landscape can experience emotions, can experience pain, can experience hurt and rejection and abandonment.

If you deny that anything is happening inside you, if you say everything is happening outside, not inside, nothing is happening inside, everything is happening outside, then of course this is a defense against trauma and against abuse and against pain and against hurt, because there's nobody there to experience all these.

And of course, narcissism is a special case of psychosis.

Because what the narcissists does, he denies the external world. He accepts only the existence of the internal world.

By denying the external world, the narcissists says, no one can hurt me. No one can cause me pain. No one can traumatize me. No one can cause me pain. No one can traumatize me. No one can abuse me simply because there's nobody there. Their external world does not exist. Other people are merely my extensions. They are merely figments of my imagination, they are nothing but internal objects.

So you see the two solutions.

The psychotic says nothing is happening inside me, everything is happening outside, so I cannot experience pain and trauma.

The narcissist says nothing is happening outside. Everything is happening inside me, so there's nobody there to traumatize me and to cause me pain.

These are two solutions which are mirror images of each other, but both of them are desperate attempts to cope with trauma and pain and hurt and life-threatening shame and guilt, desperate attempts after splitting and dissociation have failed. These are all post-traumatic conditions exactly like borderline personality disorder.


Finally, of course, if everything fails, if the entire cascade completely loses its efficacy and the person can no longer manage or control the shame, the pain, the hurt, the negative affects, then the only last remaining solution is to reject life.

And if you're religious, to reject the afterlife.

Because by committing suicide, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

Okay, it's a rejection of life and the afterlife. And it's a rejection of life by becoming one with the world.

Again, suicide is an elimination of the boundary between self and world. If you kill yourself, then you become one with the world. Your body is recycled into the world.

So suicide is a way to deny the existence of oneself to such an extreme that one becomes integrated, fully assimilated in the huge womb, huge matrix of the world.

It's like going back to the womb. It's like being unborn. It's like saying, I regret having been born. I want to go back to my mother's womb, to my mother's uterus. I want to go back to the matrix.

And I'm going to do this by eliminating myself and letting myself become one with the fabric of reality, merging and fusing finally with this ultimate maternal object, the universe.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

How Trauma Breaks You Apart (Structural Dissociation in Cold Therapy)

Dissociation can be understood as either a malfunction in integrating traumatic experiences or as a primitive defense mechanism in response to extreme trauma, particularly in children. The theory of structural dissociation posits that dissociation results from an integrative deficit, leading to the formation of distinct self-states, namely the apparently normal part (ANP) and the emotional part (EP), which interact in a conflictual manner. Trauma significantly impairs the ability to integrate experiences, resulting in symptoms that manifest as either psychoform or somatoform issues, and can lead to personality disorders being reconceptualized as disorders of integration rather than distinct personality conditions. The lecture emphasizes the importance of understanding the role of trauma in shaping these dissociative states and the need for therapeutic approaches that address the underlying trauma rather than merely the dissociative symptoms.


Stressed Narcissists, Borderlines in Psychosis: Brief, Acute, Transient, Reactive (ATPD, BP)

Psychology, emerging as a modern discipline, has redefined concepts like demon possession into terms such as switching, which refers to transitions between different self-states in certain mental health disorders. Psychosis, often hereditary and neurobiologically determined, serves as a defense mechanism against intolerable internal and external realities, particularly in individuals with narcissistic and borderline personality disorders. Stress plays a crucial role in triggering psychotic episodes, with individuals reacting to both internal and external stressors, leading to acute reactive dissociative psychosis, which can manifest as a temporary escape from overwhelming emotions and realities. This psychosis allows individuals to create an internal reality that provides a semblance of control and order, contrasting with the experiences of mentally healthy individuals who primarily respond to external stimuli.


Gangstalking is Real, Should be Studied (Conference Keynote Speech)

Victimhood gangstalking is a phenomenon that has emerged alongside social justice movements, where individuals self-identifying as victims collaborate against perceived perpetrators, creating a morality play of good versus evil. Gangstalking, often dismissed as delusional, can occur in various forms, including organized campaigns by individuals with personality disorders, cult-like groups, and even in institutional settings like legal systems. The dynamics of gangstalking resemble shared psychosis, where participants reinforce each other's narratives and engage in collective targeting of individuals, often leading to severe reputational and psychological harm. Acknowledging the reality of gangstalking is crucial for understanding its impact on victims and for developing appropriate psychological support and interventions.


Closure with Abusers

Closure is necessary for victims of abuse to heal their traumatic wounds. There are three forms of effective closure: conceptual, retributive, and dissociative. Conceptual closure involves a frank discussion of the abusive relationship, while retributive closure involves restorative justice and a restored balance. Dissociative closure occurs when victims repress their painful memories, leading to dissociative identity disorder. Victims pay a hefty price for avoiding and evading their predicament. Coping with various forms of closure will be discussed in a future video.


Dissonances, Anxiety, and Addiction (Intl. Conference on Addiction, Psychiatry and Mental Health)

Dissonance, or inner conflict, is a powerful force that can lead to addictive, traumatic, or post-traumatic behaviors. While cognitive dissonance is widely discussed, there are many other types of dissonance, including volitional, emotional, axiological, deontic, and attitude dissonance. Dissonance can arise from conflicting thoughts, emotions, values, duties, and attitudes. When defense mechanisms fail to cope with dissonance, severe anxiety can lead to self-medication and addiction, which can engender trauma and personality pathologies such as narcissism.


Beware Woke Apocalypse, Victimhood Endgame (NEW Interviews)

The rise of victimhood movements has been significantly influenced by narcissism and psychopathy, leading to a culture where individuals prioritize personal grievances over collective progress. These movements often become platforms for narcissists to gain attention and power, distorting the original goals of social justice into self-serving agendas. The pervasive nature of victimhood has created a societal landscape where empathy is diminished, and individuals are encouraged to view themselves as victims, fostering division and conflict rather than unity. Ultimately, this trend poses a serious threat to social cohesion and the ability to address larger societal issues, as the focus shifts from constructive dialogue to competitive victimhood and entitlement.


Post-traumatic Growth (PTG) or Positive Disintegration?

Psychology is often criticized for lacking rigor and scientific methodology, contributing to the replication crisis where many studies cannot be replicated. Trauma is defined as a profound conflict between reality and personal beliefs or models, leading to a breakdown of understanding and identity, while post-traumatic growth is deemed an oxymoron because trauma does not foster growth but rather regression and dysfunction. The confusion between trauma and life crises is highlighted, as the latter can lead to positive adaptations and personal development, whereas trauma is characterized by its unexpected and surreal nature, hindering growth. The concept of positive disintegration, proposed by Kazimierz Dabrowski, suggests that stress and anxiety can lead to personal growth, but this process is distinct from trauma, which ultimately stunts development and creates maladaptive changes.


Entitled Victims Turn Violent (Excerpt courtesy Michael Shellenberger)

Victim-mode movements have emerged as a significant psychological phenomenon, where individuals adopt victimhood as a core part of their identity, often seeking validation and meaning through their perceived victimization. This tendency can lead to aggressive behaviors when their expectations for special treatment are unmet, creating a cycle of abuse and victimization. Furthermore, these movements are susceptible to infiltration by narcissists and psychopaths, who can hijack the narrative for their own gain, exacerbating the potential for violence and conflict. Ultimately, grievance-based ideologies, historically linked to movements like Nazism and communism, pose a serious threat to societal stability and can lead to destructive outcomes.


Why Won’t S/he Grow Up: Precocious Adulthood Syndrome (PrAS)

The lecture introduces the concept of "precautious adulthood syndrome," or adultification, which occurs when children are forced into adult roles due to factors such as chronic illness, sexual abuse, or being parentified by caregivers. This syndrome leads to two potential outcomes: individuals may either remain in a state of infantilism, characterized by feelings of being an imposter and avoiding adult responsibilities, or they may adopt adult roles, becoming overly responsible and self-reliant at the expense of their own needs. Adultified individuals often struggle with relationships and may engage in compensatory behaviors, such as control-freak tendencies or co-dependency. The dynamics between adultified children can create a cycle where one partner assumes a nurturing role while the other remains dependent, forming a dysfunctional but symbiotic relationship.


How to Resolve Your Inner Conflicts? Deceive Yourself!

The lecture discusses the concept of dissonance, particularly cognitive dissonance, and how it manifests as conflicting thoughts or emotions within an individual. It emphasizes that dissonance can be understood through various frameworks, including the interaction of personality parts and self-states, and outlines five methods to resolve dissonance, such as temporal, reactive, inclusive, denial, and defensive solutions. The speaker argues against the notion of a unitary self, proposing instead that individuals are composed of multiple parts that interact dynamically. Additionally, the lecture categorizes different types of dissonance, including volitional, emotional, axiological, deontic, and attitudinal dissonance, and suggests that mental illness can arise from unresolved dissonance.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy