Background

International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10)

Uploaded 3/9/2011, approx. 3 minute read

My name is Sam Vaknin. I am the author of Malignant Self-Love, Narcissism Revisited.

The International Classification of Diseases, known as ICD, is published by the World Health Organization in Geneva, Switzerland. It included mental health disorders for the first time in 1948, in its sixth edition.

In 1959, following widespread criticism of its classicatory system and scheme, the World Health Organization commissioned a global survey of taxonomies of mental health problems, which was conducted by Stengel. The survey uncovered great disparities, substantial disagreements as to what constitutes mental illness and how it should be diagnosed.

In other words, there was disagreement regarding diagnostic criteria and another type of disagreement regarding differential diagnosis.

Yet it was not until 1968 that Stengel's recommendations were implemented in the eighth edition of the ICD.

The ICD-8 was descriptive and operational and did not commit itself to any theory, ideology or etiology. It did not discuss pathogenesis or psychological dynamics.

Still, the ICD-8 sported a confusing plethora of categories and allowed for rampant comorbidity, in other words, multiple diagnoses of multiple mental health disorders in the same patient.

The ICD-10, the current version, was revolutionary. It incorporated the outcomes of numerous collaborative studies and programs, both national and international, and included input from the American Psychiatric Association, the publisher of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, the ICD's equivalent in North America.

Consequently, the ICD and the DSM are now broadly similar.

But as opposed to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, the International Classification of Diseases provides two sets of diagnostic criteria for each disorder.

One list is useful to the diagnostician and allows for some latitude, and it is also useful to the practitioner's exercise of judgment.

The other set is far more precise and strict and is intended to be used by scholars and researchers in their studies.

Yet a third simplified classification is applicable to primary care settings, which contains only broad categories and wide brushstrokes.

So this third set of so-called criteria is dementia, eating disorder, psychotic disorder, without going into details.

The ICD-10 discusses organic substance use-related and stress-related disorders separately.

Chapter F, which deals with mental health disorders, is divided into 10 groups, and each group, in turn, is again divided into 100 subunits.

Thus, F2, for instance, is schizophrenia, F25 is schizoaffective disorder, and F25.1 is schizoaffective disorder of the depressive type.

You get the picture.

An international study carried out in 112 clinical centers in 39 countries demonstrated that the ICD-10 is not a reliable diagnostic tool as far as personality disorders go.

This is known as the Sartorius study, published in 1993.

These findings, however, were not replicated a year later in the USA and in Canada.

There's still hope for the ICD.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Future of Personality Disorders: ICD Revolutionary, DSM Craven

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the revolution in understanding personality disorders, with the ICD-11 leading the way in revising and reforming the way personality disorders are regarded. The ICD-11 proposes a single general personality disorder severity rating and a five-domain dimensional trait model. However, the DSM-5 failed to make a similar shift due to special interest groups and is now considered behind the times compared to the ICD-11. The DSM-5 committee's lack of courage and intellectual integrity led to a messy and confusing manual that still relies on the outdated categorical model.


Abolish Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) in DSM V?

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) is criticized for its inadequate classificatory model and diagnostic criteria, which are vague and equivocal. The DSM-5 committee proposes to abolish some personality disorders and merge them into a single diagnostic category, using a dimensional approach that reflects reality better. The DSM-5 is expected to address the longitudinal course of disorders, genetic and biological underpinnings, and effectiveness of various treatments. The DSM-5 is expected to be a significant improvement over the DSM-4 in addressing personality disorders.


Borderline's Miracle Healing

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is less prevalent than commonly believed, affecting about 1-2% of the general population, yet it accounts for a significant portion of mental health treatment cases due to crises. The prognosis for BPD is generally positive, with many individuals experiencing spontaneous remission or significant improvement through therapies like Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), leading to a high percentage of patients no longer meeting diagnostic criteria over time. While symptoms related to impulsivity and behavior tend to remit more quickly, some underlying traits and dysfunctional behaviors may persist even after the disorder itself has resolved. Effective treatment should not only address the core symptoms of BPD but also focus on helping individuals develop functional skills for social and vocational success, particularly in younger populations.


Can People Switch Between Incompatible Disorders (Narcissist, Psychopath, Borderline)?

Mental health diagnoses consist of three elements: etiology, psychodynamics, and behavior, all of which must be present for a diagnosis to be valid. In cases of comorbidity, one disorder typically dominates and dictates the patient's psychodynamic processes and behaviors, while the recessive disorder may only influence behavior under extreme stress. Individuals with personality disorders may exhibit behaviors associated with other disorders during crises, but this does not mean they have transitioned into a different disorder; these behaviors are temporary coping strategies. Ultimately, these self-states are not permanent, and individuals will revert to their dominant disorder after the crisis has passed.


New Light on Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) in DSM-5-TR and ICD-11

Psychology is currently in turmoil with new diagnostic texts, definitions, and clinical insights. The DSM-5 text revision and the ICD-11 both offer new approaches to understanding borderline personality disorder (BPD). The distinction between complex trauma and BPD is blurry, and some scholars argue that various personality disorders, including narcissistic and borderline, should be considered post-traumatic conditions. The ICD-11 has moved towards a dimensional approach, focusing on aspects like identity, empathy, and antagonism, suggesting that all personality disorders may be part of a single underlying clinical entity.


Study: Weak Self of Covert Narcissists, Secondary Psychopaths

A study has found that individuals with Cluster B personality disorders, specifically those with dark triad traits, have a weak, unstable, and unclear sense of self. The study's authors suggest that recognizing these traits is important in predicting behaviors and avoiding destructive, impulsive, and callous behaviors. The study also found that high-level dark triad traits are associated with a weaker sense of self, regardless of gender and age. However, when analyzing sub-traits of narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism, the study found that vulnerable narcissism and secondary psychopathy are most strongly correlated with a weaker or unclear sense of self.


Personality Disorders Gender Bias

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) confesses to gender bias, with personality disorders such as borderline and histrionic being more common among women, while narcissistic, antisocial, schizotypal, passive compulsive, schizoid and paranoid disorders are more prevalent among men. The reason for this gender disparity may be due to culture-bound syndromes, with personality disorders reflecting biases and value judgments of the prevailing culture. Upbringing, environment, socialization, cultural mores, and genetics may also play a role in the pathogenesis of personality disorders. Ultimately, the ambiguity and equivocation of the diagnostic criteria may be the problem, with gender bias being everywhere in the psychiatric profession.


Personality or Gut Disorders? Microbiome and Mental Illness

The gut microbiome plays a crucial role in mental health, influencing not only brain function but also personality and temperament through a bidirectional relationship. This relationship suggests that gut bacteria can affect emotional states and behaviors, while psychological conditions can alter gut microbiota composition. Research indicates that disturbances in gut bacteria are linked to various psychiatric disorders, including borderline personality disorder, and that early life factors, such as maternal gut health, can impact the development of these conditions. The interconnectedness of bodily systems challenges traditional views of mental health, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach to treatment that considers the gut-brain axis. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of gut health in understanding and potentially treating mental health issues.


Narcissists and Negativistic (Passive-Aggressive) Personality Disorder

Negativistic, passive-aggressive personality disorder is characterized by chronic pessimism, resistance to authority, and a tendency to undermine others in social and workplace settings. Individuals with this disorder often exhibit behaviors such as procrastination, neglect, and sabotage, while feeling unappreciated and victimized by their circumstances. They display a range of negative emotions, including irritability and envy, and often react to perceived slights with sulking or the silent treatment. Despite their obstructive behavior, they may seek forgiveness and promise change when confronted, but these promises typically go unfulfilled.


Borderline Woman as Dissociative Secondary Psychopath

Borderline Personality Disorder and Psychopathy may not be as different as previously thought. Recent studies suggest that Borderline and Histrionic Personality Disorders may be manifestations of secondary type psychopathy in women. Survivors of Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) also exhibit psychopathic and narcissistic behaviors. Borderline Personality Disorder can be described as a subspecies of Dissociative Identity Disorder, with mood lability and emotional dysregulation being outward manifestations of changes in self-states.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy