Background

Privatized Empathy and Cowardly Public "Intellectuals"

Uploaded 5/19/2024, approx. 5 minute read

The vibrant world of private empathy has been replaced by faceless state lodges, pity, mercy, the elation of giving, they are all tax deductible.

In generally speaking, it is a sorry sight. It's the demise of empathy.

We have been warning against this for like ages. And no one would listen, and no one would listen because the efforts of money, efforts of power, efforts of manipulating other people to obtain desirable goals and preferable outcomes, it's taken over.

Even public intellectuals who tell you how to live your life, how to become better people, they're not telling you how to become better people. They're teaching you how to become more efficient people, very often at the expense of others.

I'm sorry, I can't think of a single public intellectual who is not narcissistic, psychopathic, self-centered, egotistical, narcissistic, sadistic to some extent, and all of them are teaching you, all of them are teaching you not how to develop empathy, compassion and care and love towards your fellow beings, but how to make maximal use of your natural endowments and to fake and to lie and to pretend so as to obtain whatever and to extricate whatever you can for others.

In other words, the view of public intellectuals today is that the world is a win-lose situation.

In this sense, I'm terribly sorry, terribly sorry to say that I can't see any difference in principle between Donald Trump's jungle, Darwinian view of the world, and any public intellectual I know, they're all saying the same, but some of them are saying it in a high-faluting way, some of them, you know, in a pub with a pint kind of way, but they are all saying the same.

It's eat or be eaten, kill or be killed, manipulate or be manipulated, to be the sucker, get ahead, make the most, and the hell with others.

The world in Macedonia can be divided into four groups, I would say. By far the biggest group are the fearful or paranoid intellectuals.

These are intellectuals who are so afraid of the government and its machinery that they chose to live in a solipsistic world.

They communicate only with a few trusted ones. They don't go out in public. They refuse to comment on public processes, public debate and public questions. They actually self-annihilate, self-destruct.

And in this sense, they have very little impact on society and culture, and they do not function as intellectuals.

Then you have an equally large group of intellectuals in Macedonia, of intellectuals who are self-interested.

They leverage their intellect, they leverage whatever knowledge they have and so on, in order to obtain political positions, in order to make money, in order to get jobs. These intellectuals are affiliated and aligned and identify with, usually, political parties, on the left and on the right. It's not limited to one part of the spectrum.

They pursue their self-interest and sacrifice their integrity as intellectuals.

Again, in Macedonia, this is a very large group. The vast majority, if not all, public intellectuals in Macedonia are heavily politicized and are self-interested. They are not real intellectuals in any sense of the word.

Then you have a third group, which is what I call the territorial group.

These are intellectuals whose education was finished in the 1970s. They speak no foreign languages or no major foreign languages. Their knowledge is not updated and they don't bother to read or to update their knowledge.

Knowing that they are inferior intellectually compared to their Western intellectuals and compared to younger intellectuals, they are fiercely territorial. They protect the monopoly of knowledge. They exclude young intellectuals. They do not allow new blood, fresh blood, to come in. They block new ideas. They destroy new knowledge, fight new knowledge and so on.

This territoriality renders the intellectuals seen in Macedonia very dead, very stagnant, kind of fossil landscape.


Lastly and fourthly is a new breed of intellectuals, which has arisen in the last three years, especially under the current Vemiro government in the last few years.

This is what I call the malignantly romantic intellectual. The intellectuals who are demagogues, the intellectuals who falsify history or use folk myths and folk heroes to foster a false nationalistic pride, the intellectuals who, these are the intellectuals who actually created Balkan wars and Balkan tensions in the last century.

And there is a new breed, a new malignant breed of such intellectuals coming to being in Macedonia.

It is very difficult to get rid of these intellectuals even when the regime changes because they poison public opinion. They poison public debate and it's later their impacts, their effects are the equivalent of infection or disease.

So, unfortunately, when you look at the intellectuals seen in Macedonia, you see these people.

The fearful, the paranoid, the self-interested, those who pursue money and jobs, the territorial, those whose knowledge is completely irrelevant yet protect their territory against newcomers, new knowledge and new ideas, and the malignantly romantic.

In this sense, the intellectuals of Macedonia betrayed Macedonia and betrayed the people because it is the role of intellectuals to invigorate the nation, to invigorate the collective, to invigorate society and to integrate society and culture in the global trends.

While intellectuals in Macedonia did exactly the opposite, they isolated Macedonia. They made it into a floating island, Alakustuwica. It's completely the reverse of what intellectuals should do.

Finally there's the question why. Why do intellectuals in the Balkans in general and in Macedonia in particular behave this way?

Well, the short and the long answer is Marxism and later on socialism and communism, the manifestations of Marxism.

You see, classical Marxism and even modern post-Marxism re-defined the intellectual. Marxists of all varieties and colors believed that intellectuals should be leaders. They invented the concept of mobilized intellectual. They did not believe in the capacity of the proletariat to lead itself, to generate ideas and to decide on a direction.

So what they did, they plucked the intellectuals and then made them part of the nomenclature.

The intellectual, the manager of big industry, the politician in communist regimes were of equal status. The intellectual was co-opted, subverted, became part of the power machine.

Instead of standing outside the machine and subverting it, it perpetrated the machine. It created the machine.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Our Public "Intellectuals": Avarice, Malice, Grandiosity

Public intellectuals are not teaching people how to develop empathy, compassion, care, and love towards their fellow beings. Instead, they are teaching people how to make maximal use of their natural endowments and to fake, lie, and pretend to obtain whatever they can for themselves. The view of public intellectuals today is that the world is a win-lose situation, and they are not different from Donald Trump's jungle, Darwinian view of the world.


Watch This to Make Sense of the World

The current societal landscape is characterized by a historical struggle between elites, middle classes, and masses, with elites historically maintaining control through political and economic structures. The emergence of the middle class created a bridge between the elites and masses, leading to a temporary truce where the masses sought to join the elite rather than overthrow them. However, recent technological advancements have empowered the masses, enabling them to challenge elite control and assert their power through populist movements. The pandemic has further exposed the fragility of the elites' narratives and the inequalities within society, prompting a call for the masses to disengage from the systems that perpetuate their subjugation and to embrace a form of passive resistance.


How We Ended Up in This Mess (Documentary Excerpt)

The Enlightenment project has failed due to the metastasis of its core values, leading to malignant individualism, malignant egalitarianism, malignant tolerance, and malignant reasoning. Malignant individualism has resulted in the breakdown of institutions and increased alienation, while malignant egalitarianism has led to destructive envy and the rise of narcissism. Malignant tolerance has given way to moral relativism, political correctness, and the erosion of academic rigor. Lastly, malignant reasoning has prioritized ideas and concepts over people, leading to the rise of pseudosciences and the confusion between technology, science, and civilization.


The Rich Have You BRAINWASHED: Capitalism is a Zero-sum Game, They WIN, YOU LOSE

Capitalism operates as a zero-sum game, where the rich disproportionately benefit while the poor remain stagnant or worsen in their economic status. Despite the illusion of growth in the economy, social mobility in the United States is low, and wealth is primarily inherited rather than earned. The mechanisms of taxation and inflation serve to transfer wealth from the poor to the rich, further entrenching inequality. Ultimately, the system is rigged to favor the wealthy, leading to a cycle of exploitation and scarcity that the elites perpetuate to maintain their power.


Avoid Mentally Ill: No Families, Relationships

Mentally ill people want to be normal, but it is a lie that therapists and psychologists tell them that they can be cured and lead a normal life. Mental illness is a lifelong condition that is part of a person's identity and cannot be cured or healed. Mentally ill people should be managed, regulated, and isolated to prevent them from causing harm to themselves and others. Instead of seeking normalcy and intimacy, mentally ill people should focus on their areas of high functioning and accept their limitations.


Warning Young Folks: Silence When We Are All Gone

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses his concerns about the younger generation, noting their lack of emotions, meaningful relationships, and intellectual pursuits. He believes that the focus on action over emotion and cognition is leading to a culture of nihilism and disconnection. Vaknin argues that positive emotions should drive actions, as negative emotions lead to destructive outcomes. He concludes that the current state of the younger generation is a mental suicide, and that a shift in focus towards emotions, cognition, and meaningful connections is necessary for a better future.


Narcissistic Ideas of Progress: Our Dystopian Future (with Ginger Coy)

The current global landscape is increasingly dominated by narcissistic and psychopathic leaders, leading to a rise in autocratic governance and a decline in democratic values. This shift is characterized by a societal preference for fantasy and victimhood, which allows individuals to evade personal responsibility and accountability. The Enlightenment project has largely failed, resulting in a world where narcissism is prevalent and often rewarded, necessitating a reevaluation of how society engages with these traits. Ultimately, the future may see a normalization of autocracy and a resurgence of traditional values, particularly as younger generations adapt to these changes without recognizing their implications.


Mental Illness: Gift? Asset?

Mental illness can be perceived as an asset in a hostile and chaotic world, as it often deters aggression from others who fear unpredictable behavior. It is also viewed as a gateway to unique insights and knowledge that conforming individuals may lack, positioning the mentally ill as possessors of hidden truths. Additionally, the impulsive and rebellious nature of mental illness allows individuals to challenge societal norms, making them figures of admiration and envy. Consequently, mental illness is increasingly seen as aspirational in contemporary society, reflecting a complex relationship between mental health and social dynamics.


Slacker Narcissists: Indolence as Ideology

Success is often perceived as achievable through hard work, talent, and education, but this notion is challenged by the idea that social mobility is largely determined by one's family background and luck. The character Vautrin from Balzac's "Père Goriot" argues that marrying into wealth is a more effective path to success than traditional means, a sentiment echoed by modern studies indicating that most successful individuals come from affluent families. The lecture also explores the concept of narcissism, highlighting two types: the indolent narcissist who rejects work as a principle and the driven narcissist who equates hard work with personal worth, both of which reflect a broader societal trend towards shortcuts and entitlement. Ultimately, the discussion critiques the glorification of scams and shortcuts in contemporary culture, suggesting that these attitudes undermine the value of hard work and ethical behavior.


Pandemic Slaves and Their Neo-feudal Masters: Envy-fuelled Insurrection

Income inequality is set to increase dramatically, exacerbated by the pandemic, which has decimated entrepreneurship and self-employment, traditionally pathways for social mobility. The consolidation of wealth will lead to a landscape dominated by a few large corporations, while the majority of the population will struggle in the gig economy, often working multiple jobs just to survive. The pandemic has accelerated existing trends, revealing a disconnect between the wealthy and the poor, where the rich become increasingly detached from the economic realities faced by the majority. This shift may result in a future characterized by social unrest and a growing resentment towards the wealthy, as the foundations of capitalism are challenged by rising poverty and declining opportunities for upward mobility.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy