Background

Sex Addiction, Hypersexuality, Compulsive Sexual Behaviour Disorder ( CSBD)

Uploaded 1/14/2023, approx. 15 minute read

Okay, shvanpanim, shovavim, shoshanim, babieses and all other creatures of land and sea.

Today we are going to discuss sex addiction. Is there such a thing or is it all male chauvinistic hype?

My name is Sam Vaknin, I'm the author of Malignant Self-Love, Narcissism, Narcissism: Barriculture, and I'm a professor of psychology in CIAPS, the Center for International Advancedment of Professional Studies and the SIAS-CIAPS Consortium of Universities.

But before we go into the issue of sex addiction and whether there is such a thing, my video is about mate poaching, backstabbing, bed mouthing, fake friends, elicited a tsunami of questions.

By far the most common question is, should I punish them for what they have done? Of course you should. The entire justice system is founded on retribution and just desserts.

And in case of betrayal, so profound, there is no statute of limitations and no proportionality.

You see, I am an Old Testament kind of Jew, two eyes for an eye and a nose into the bargain. I remind you, it may take weeks or months or years, but justice will be meted out and whoever the perpetrator may be, he should be looking behind his shoulder day and night.

But I will deal with deserving penalties for friendship betrayal on my return from my trip to Budapest. I remind you that if you want to book a counseling session with me, just write to samvaknin@jimay.com. I will be in Budapest. We can meet face to face to your great detriment.

So let's dive right in.

Pardon the pun.

There is a lot of misunderstanding. There are many misunderstandings, a lot of misrepresentations.

Regarding sex addiction. I'm going to make a few points which are essentially counterintuitive as I usually do. And then we will go into the clinical picture of sex addiction.


But before we start, the field of sexology or sex studies is thoroughly contaminated by political correctness. Actually, this applies to many other disorders. For example, masochistic and sadistic personality disorders. Sadistic, defeating personality disorder as it used to be known. They were dropped after the DSM three because of pressure by feminists who insisted that masochistic personality disorder is a gender bias construct. It reflects on women much more than men.

That's one example of political correctness contaminating and I'm using the word judiciously, clinical discourse. Same applies to sex addiction.

Everyone knows that there is such a thing. Everyone knows it's a clinical entity. I will go into it shortly.

But no one dares to include it in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, edition five, text revision, published a few months ago. Why?

Because of special interest groups and political pressure. This is not science. This is pseudoscience. This is politics.

Of course, of course, there is such a thing as sexual addiction. But there are many misapprehensions and miscomprehensions regarding this.

And I'm going to try to shed some light on some of the aspects of sex addiction, which are much neglected.


First of all, do not confuse and conflate sex addiction with promiscuity. Promiscuity is a choice to be indiscriminate in mate selection, sexual partner selection. In other words, promiscuity is simply having sex with anyone and everyone, regardless of attributes, character, physical properties and so on and so forth.

Rescuity is indiscriminate. Sex addiction is an entirely different thing.

Many sex addicts are actually not promiscuous. They do apply certain standards. They are not indiscriminate. They are discriminate.

But once certain attributes or certain standards have been met, they are unable to control the impulse to have sex. So sex addiction is a compulsion. Promiscuity is a lifestyle choice, a behavioral pattern, sexual style. It's not compulsive.

Sex addiction is compulsive.

But ironically, in sex addiction, usually there are some standards while in promiscuity, there are none.

The next thing you should know, sex addiction doesn't necessarily involve other people.

For example, most sex addicts masturbate 10 or 20 times a day. They can't control their masturbation. This is their outlet for their addiction to sex.

Many sex addicts are actually celibate because they are terrified of their inability to say no. They don't want to place themselves in situations where they will end up having sex and hurting loved ones, spouses, intimate partners, boyfriends or girlfriends.

So you can find sex addicts who are celibate, but they must debate compulsively. Usually consuming porn. And this porn consumption in sex addicts is gender neutral.

While among other people, healthy people, normal people, other people with personality disorders and so on, among all other people, men mostly consume pornography. About 70 plus percent of pornography is consumed by men.

Among sex addicts, both men and women consume pornography equally.

Now, the porn addict, the sex addict actually is not obsessed with sex. It's not about having sex. It's not like constantly thinking about sex. It's more impulsive. It's more sudden. It's more an uncontrollable craving or urge to have sex with someone who fits the bill, with someone who meets certain criteria and standards.

So there is like a threshold condition. The sex addict comes across someone who satisfies a certain profile, a certain job description.

But then at that point, the sex addict becomes compulsive. He acts impulsively. His actions are sudden. His urges and cradles are uncontrollable.

Many have sex or she has sex. Sex addiction serves many psychodynamic or psychological purposes.

For example, sex addiction, the sex addict uses sex to self soothe or to reduce anxiety.

Now, various studies starting in 1993 found that anxiety is actually not correlated with sex addiction. There were studies of promiscuity among borderline, among people with borderline personality disorder. And some of them were sex addicts, promiscuous and sex addicts. And so these studies found that the group that was the group of people who were sex addicted or the group of people who were promiscuous were not anxious. And the group of people who were anxious, borderline, usually self mutilated.

So you could consider, you could conceive of sex addiction as self mutilation, the equivalent of self harm in borderline personality disorder.

This is why the impulsive, the sudden, the uncontrollable nature of the sex impulse in sex addicts leads them to situations which are egodystonic. They feel shame, they feel guilt, and they do damage their relationships to a large degree. They hurt themselves. It's dysfunctional. They are in distress.

Now, many sex addicts are actually motivated by the need for attention. It's not about sex so much. It's about attention.

There is an automatic negative thought involved and catastrophizing. And the automatic negative thought is, if I don't give sex, if I don't agree to sex, there's nothing else I can offer that will guarantee attention. If I want attention, I have to engage in sex.

Sex is the condition for obtaining attention. I get attention mostly and the focus of attention. Only when I engage in sex. It's an automatic negative thought.

The catastrophizing aspect is, if I were to abstain, if I were to not give sex or to not agree to have sex, to not give consent, then I will be abandoned. I will be dumped. I will be ignored.

Now, sex addiction didn't make it owing to political pressures, didn't make it into the diagnostic and statistical manual, section 4, text revision 4, 5 and text revision 5. It's taboo. It's not discussed. This is despite the fact that several very important studies have demonstrated clearly that sex addiction is a real clinical entity. It's a real thing. It's a real phenomenon.

There was a major study led by Rory Reid, I think his name is. Rory Ryd, I think his name is.


Rory Ryd is a research psychologist in the Department of Psychiatry at the University of California, Los Angeles, UCLA. He led a team of researchers. He investigated at the time the proposed criteria for what was called then hyper-sexual disorder, being too sexed, having an id, in Freud's terms, which is too dominant, overrides the ego.

So, Ryd and his team made the most thorough study of sexual addiction. They published their findings in the Journal of Sexual Medicine.

They concluded that the given criteria for sexual addiction are valid and that the disorder could be reliably diagnosed.

Now, Europe, as usual, is very different to the United States and much more advanced than the United States in terms of diagnosis and classification because European authorities like the WHO, World Health Organization, they are not subject to political pressures.

So, there's a diagnostic manual, ICD, International Classification of Diseases, published by the World Health Organization. In the 11th edition, there is something called Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder, CSBD. It's also known as Hyper-Sexual Disorder.

Remember Ryd and his study? It's a pattern of behavior involving intense preoccupation with sexual fantasies and behaviors that cause distress, are inappropriately used to cope with stress, cannot be voluntarily curtailed and risk or cause harm to oneself or to others.

The disorder, again, Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder, CSBD, also involves impairment in social, sexualor other important functions.

So, we have something very similar to sex addiction in the ICD-11, but not in the DSM.


Now, I will return to you the criteria of Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder, a persistent pattern of failure to control intense repetitive sexual impulses or urges resulting in repetitive sexual behavior.

Symptoms may include repetitive sexual activities becoming a central focus of the person's life to the point of neglecting health and personal care or other interests, activitiesand responsibilities, numerous unsuccessful efforts to significantly reduce repetitive sexual behavior and continued repetitive sexual behavior despite adverse consequences or deriving little or no satisfaction from it.

Just to make clear, sexual behavior could include compulsive masturbation, compulsive porn consumption, porn addiction. It doesn't have to be with other people, but usually it is with other people.

And it's very important that these activities do not give the sex addict any pleasure in most cases.

The sex addict cannot control these behaviors even when she knows this is going to ruin her relationships or marriage. Even when she knows that the consequences are going to be horrible and totally disproportionate, she can't stop herself or of course himself.


The criteria in the ICD-11 are a pattern of failure to control intense sexual impulses or urges resulting in repetitive sexual behavior.

Number two, manifested over an extended period of time, example six months or more.

Number three, that this behavior causes marked distress or significant impairment in personal, family, social, educational, occupationalor other important areas of functioning. Distress that is entirely related to moral judgments and disapproval about sexual impulses, urgesand behaviors is not sufficient.

So we are not talking here about moral judgment. We're talking about objective distress. We're talking about a situation where repetitive urges, compulsive behaviors destroy your life, destroy your relationships, make you lose people you love, destroy your work or career, undermine your life in a variety of ways.

What could be the root of all this? What is the psychological etiology, the reasoning behind sexual addiction?

Well, not to put too fine a point of it on it, we don't know. We don't know. We know that people with sex addiction, they all the time attempt to control or to diminish the amount of time spent engaging in sexual fantasies, urgesand behaviors. They're obsessed with trying to somehow minimize their compulsion or cage it or somehow control it.

They experience these attempts as shameful. They feel helpless. They feel impotent. They feel hopeless because the more they try, the more often they fail. It's a sense or pervasive sense of personal failure.

These people engage in sexual behaviors and do experience them as compulsive.

When you interview them later, they say, I was on autopilot. I was not there. I didn't know what I was doing.

So we know that sexual addiction is somehow linked to certain types of dissociation. For example, derealization, the feeling that you are not in reality or in some kind of movie or depersonalization, the feeling that it's not you who is doing these things, someone else is.

Of course, depersonalization and derealization are intimately connected with borderline personality disorder. We may conceive of sex addiction as a desperate attempt to regulate shame, guilt, emotionsand lay by moods.

People who engage, people who are sex addicts and keep doing these things could beagaincompulsive, timeconsuming masturbation and could be sex with highly specific types and could be compulsive sex that follows specific settings.

So whenever you're in a date, you end up having sex. Whenever you're in a room, you end up having sex. Whenever you're in a restaurant, you end up having sex. Whenever you're in a camp, you end up having sex.

So when there's a context, a specific context, it triggers sexual behavior.

And so these individuals find themselves under the spell and controland they know that this is going to have really bad, adverse medical, legal, interpersonal consequences. And they neglect other activities, social, recreational responsibilities.

They just, sex takes over. The sex takes over in a variety of ways.

And hypersexual disorder, which is the other name for sex addiction, is usually lifelong. It's a dimension of personality in a way.

And so in cognitive behavioral theories of sexual addiction and CSBD, we believe that it's somehow linked to shame. The shame is associated with cognitive schema of self-defectiveness, like I'm defective, I'm incomplete, I'm not whole. This is what I call the bad object.

These introjects that keep telling you, you're unworthy, you're unlovable, you don't deserve happinessand so on and so forth. A feeling of social pain and isolation usually follows because you feel that you're not good enough to be loved, appreciated by people.

So the chronic shame gets attached somehow to social stigmaand they both usually hail from early traumatic experiences.

Sexual behavior in this case becomes self-soothing. These people medicate with sexual behavior. It's anxiolytic, it reduces anxiety.

And this becomes compulsive because they're constantly in an egodystonic state, shame, guilt, anxiety, whatever.

Sex seems to be the only solution. The excessive and inappropriate sexual behavior is socially unacceptable and this causes extra shame. It's a self-perpetuating, self-sustaining cycle.

You misbehave sexually, you feel guilt and shame, you feel like an outcast, you feel like a freak.

And so to self-soothe you engage again in sex, inappropriate sexor in an appropriate settingor with inappropriate peopleand againyou feel shame and guiltand again you need to have sex.

So it's a self-reinforcing feedback loop. And there is no good treatment. It could be conceived as obsessivecompulsive disorderor maybe anxiety disorderand some medication and some types of treatment, reduced shame and help with social reintegration.

But all in allthe outcomes are very poor and so is the prognosis. It's a lifelong debilitating behavior, dysfunctional behavior.

I'm sorry I couldn't end on a positive note. Actually I'm not.

And I encourage you to post your thoughts and experiences, especially those of you who are sex addictsand feel bad about it.

Why not share and see what other people have to say. Have fun kids.

I'm Asta La Vista, I'm on my way to Budapestand then when I'm backit's the time for fake friends.


[ Pause ]

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

MMPI-2 Psychological Test: Controversial, but Hard to Fake

The MMPI-2 test booklet has 567 items, but a rough assessment can be made based on the first 370 queries. The items are arranged in scales, and the responses are compared to answers provided by control subjects. The nature of the deviation determines the patient's traits and tendencies, but not their diagnosis. The test results place the subject in a group of patients who reacted similarly, and the validity scales indicate whether the patient responded truthfully and accurately or was trying to manipulate the test. The clinical scales measure various mental health issues, and the interpretation of the MMPI-2 is now fully computerized.


Regretting Your Promiscuity? Do This!

In this video, Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the differences in social sexuality and how it relates to mental illness. People with unrestricted social sexuality, who can have sex with strangers without any problem, are typically subclinical psychopaths. However, there are people who sleep with strangers habitually but hold conservative values, leading to cognitive dissonance and egodystonic behavior. These people may spiral down into a state of alcoholism and self-trashing, but there are effective treatments available, such as dialectical behavior therapy and behavior modification techniques. Vaknin encourages people to seek help and not give up on life.


Toxic Sex: When "Love" Is Bad For You

Sex can be bad for mental health, just like cigarettes. Some forms of sex, such as those intended to regulate emotions or moods, or those without meaningful informed consent, are toxic and should be avoided. Sex used as a form of self-mutilation or self-harm, or as a way to self-objectify, is also bad for mental health. Non-autonomous sex, where sex is used to make a partner like or love you, is possibly the sickest form of sex. The psychosexuality of those who engage in bad, toxic, and wrong sex is part psychopathic and part people-pleasing.


Are You a Pathological Gambler? Test Yourself!

The lecture presents a test designed to help individuals assess whether they are compulsive gamblers or professional gamblers based on their gambling behaviors and attitudes. It includes a series of yes or no questions that explore patterns of betting, emotional responses to wins and losses, and decision-making during gambling sessions. Positive responses to specific questions indicate a higher likelihood of being a pathological gambler, while negative responses suggest a more controlled approach to gambling. The lecturer emphasizes that the test is not clinically validated and serves as a fun reflection of observations made in various gambling environments, ultimately advising caution and awareness of the inherent risks in gambling.


Promiscuity: Psychology of Self-Soothing with Sex (oh, and Relationships)

Promiscuity and cheating are increasingly common responses to neglect, abuse, and indifference in intimate relationships, often reflecting a broader societal trend where sex is reduced to a mechanical act devoid of emotional connection. This behavior is frequently linked to various mental health disorders, such as borderline personality disorder and narcissism, where individuals use promiscuity as a coping mechanism to regulate their self-worth and manage feelings of rejection or humiliation. The rise of online dating and the breakdown of traditional social mores have further exacerbated this issue, leading to a culture of reckless sexual behavior with little regard for the emotional or medical consequences. Ultimately, the lecture suggests that these trends are symptomatic of deeper psychological and societal dysfunctions, with little hope for a return to meaningful intimacy in relationships.


Mental Health Dictionary - Letter C

The lecture discusses various mental health concepts starting with the letter C, including catalypsy, catatonia, and compulsions. Catalypsy is characterized by the rigid maintenance of body positions, while catatonia encompasses a range of motoric abnormalities and was previously linked to schizophrenia but is now viewed as an affective disorder. Compulsions involve involuntary, repetitive actions that provide relief from anxiety, common in obsessive-compulsive disorders. The lecture also touches on concrete thinking, confabulation, and culture-bound syndromes, highlighting their significance in mental health diagnostics.


Psychological Tests and Structured Interviews: Introduction

Personality assessment combines both art and science, with standardized psychological tests and structured interviews designed to minimize bias and ensure objectivity. These tests often limit responses to specific formats, such as true or false, and rely on automated scoring to reduce human involvement in data gathering. However, interpretation remains crucial, and practitioners typically use multiple tests to create a coherent picture of an individual's personality, ensuring that results align across different assessments. The distinction between objective and projective tests highlights the varying levels of structure and potential bias in scoring, with projective tests relying heavily on the clinician's judgment and interpretation.


Inside Mind of Murderous Narcissist (with Isla Traquair)

The lecture explores the psychological profiles of different types of killers, focusing on sexual sadists, psychopaths, and impulse killers. Sexual sadists kill to achieve a sense of intimacy and control, often viewing their victims as objects to be dismantled and studied, while psychopaths kill out of possessiveness and a desire for power, often blaming their victims for provoking them. Impulse killings, on the other hand, are situational and typically lack the underlying mental health pathology seen in the other two categories. The discussion emphasizes that while many killers may exhibit traits of narcissism or psychopathy, not all abusers fit these personality disorders, as the motivations for violence can stem from a variety of psychological issues, including separation insecurity and a need for control. Ultimately, the lecture highlights the complexities of human behavior and the blurred lines between different personality disorders and violent actions.


Fetishes, Gender Roles, Monogamy (ENGLISH responses)

In this transcript, Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the misconceptions surrounding gender, sex, and sexual orientation. He argues that gender roles are not determined by sexual equipment and that sexual attraction is socially determined rather than biologically determined. Vaknin also explains that fetishism is the natural state of sexuality and that the idealized sexuality of being attracted to the totality of a person is rare. He suggests that the real abnormality is people who do not have fetishes and that pedophiles have a holistic, total view of sexuality.


How Porn Destroyed Sex (and Narcissism, of course) (ENGLISH responses)

Pornography has severe psychological effects, even on those who consume it casually. It diminishes the ability to connect intimacy to sexual arousal, objectifies the female body, and reduces it to body parts. Pornography also includes a lot of aggression, which leads teenagers to expect real-life sex to be aggressive and violent. The boundaries between pornography and real-life sex have blurred to the point that men feel entitled to demand from women to be porn stars. Women have developed pornographic availability as a counter to pornography, and the whole real-life sex has become pornographic. Women are in a terrible situation because they have to escalate to attract men. Men don't need women anymore because the only thing that a woman could give that was exclusive was her anatomy, and now, this is free. Women and men

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy