Background

When Is It OK to CRY? 3 Rules

Uploaded 12/13/2024, approx. 10 minute read

Another Vaknin video. Enough to bring tears to your eyes. Are you crying? Why are you crying? I promise to make this video shorter than usual. Well, not that short.

So today we're going to discuss crying. When is it okay to go lacrimose? When is it okay to cry? What are the risks in crying and what are the benefits? All this in today's tearful admission of a video.

My name is Sam Vaknin. I am the author of Malignant Self-Love, Narcissism Revisited, the first book ever about narcissistic abuse. I'm also a professor of clinical psychology and all my students regularly cry, at least in my classes.


When is it okay to cry? Three rules.

Let's start with the basics. I'm sorry, I'm still under the weather.

Crying is a form of signaling. I'm sorry, I'm still under the weather.

Crying is a form of signaling.

When you cry, you're trying to signal something.

Crying conveys information to the environment about distress, hopelessness, helplessness, sadness, and despair. Yours, of course, the crying persons.

You're communicating to the environment. Hey, listen, I am distressed. I feel hopeless. I feel helpless. I'm profoundly sad and I'm desperate.

Implied in this message is, Please help me. It's no wonder that the phrase is a cry for help.

Crying is also anxiolytic. It reduces and mitigates anxiety.

And it is anxiolytic because it is instinctively, unconsciously perceived as a cue, a behavior modification cue.

In other words, the implicit assumption when you cry is that your tears, the sounds you make, the facial expressions associated with crying, all these will somehow serve to modify the behaviors of people around you.

Now this is very reminiscent of anger. Anger fulfills the same function.

In anger, the expression, facial expression changes. In anger, there are sounds made. Anger is ostentatious in a public display. There's no privacy in anger.

And indeed, crying and anger co-occur. They often happen together. You often cry when you are angry.

And so the anxiolytic impact, the anxiety reducing effect of crying is because you predict the future. You anticipate the future.

It's like you're saying to yourself, I'm crying now. People are going to notice that I'm crying. They're going to change their behaviors and the reason for crying will disappear.

I'm crying because of what people are doing or what people are not doing. I'm crying because what people are saying or what they're not saying. I'm crying because I'm shunned and ostracized. I'm crying because I'm overcrowded. I'm crying because things are not going my way. These people are obstructing me, envious to me.

I'm crying. And I'm crying. And I'm making a spectacle out of it because I expect people to modify themselves, their behaviors and the environment to accommodate me, to somehow reduce the causes of my distress, somehow render me more hopeful, I'm sorry, randomly more self-efficacious.

So crying is anxiolytic because it's a behavior modification cue.

Babies cry in order to modify adult behaviors. A baby cries because the baby wants to modify the mother's behavior and to kind of coerce her or force her to feed the baby. To change the baby's diapers, because baby is wet, to pay attention to baby, to remain in the room, because it's terrifying when mother leaves the room.

So crying is a tool. It's an instrument.

And even babies use crying in order to impact their environment in ways which are benevolent and beneficial and conducive to favorable outcomes. This is known as self-efficacy.

Crying therefore is closely associated with self-efficacy. And these forms of externalized emotions, anger, crying, and so on so forth, they are all about making sure that you rearrange your human environment and physical environment so as to maximize beneficial outcomes.

And this restores a sense of safety.

It's as if when you cry, you're telling yourself, everything will be okay.

Now that I've cried, people will notice, and once they have noticed, they will change your behaviors, they will change your environment, they will remove the proximate causes of my distress, my unhappiness, my despair, and then the crying will have accomplished its goal.

Crying is also a form of psychological sharing, and we have this saying, sharing is caring.

Crying forces people to offer succor, advice, help, directions.

Crying, therefore, brings out the best in people.

And because it does, because you can anticipate these outcomes, crying is soothing and comforting.

Albeit inexorable and uncontrollable, one could even say impulsive, crying is also a kind of self-regulatory behavior.

It's as if you have crossed the Rubicon, as if you have kind of transitioned from an inhibited state of I'm brave. I'm going to put a brave face on it. I'm not going to cry. I'm not going to make a spectacle out of myself. I'm not going to stand there and wipe my tears and you know and then you say I can't take it anymore and you transition it's a phase transition you transition from one state of mind the state of mind of what is socially acceptable what is internally regulated what is controlled what is socially acceptable, what is internally regulated, what is controlled, what is appropriate and transition from this state of mind to another state of mind which says, I am now babylike. I'm babylike and I need to cry and I need to cry because it's going to make me feel better and I need to cry because I need to communicate my state of mind to other people and I need to do that because I need help I need help it's a cry for help and I need them to empathize with me and sympathize with me and help me and extend a hand across a divide, the intersubjective divide between people. I need company. It's not that misery loves company. It's that crying brings together people in ad hoc mini or miniature communities.

And then once the situation is resolved somehow, the community disperses.

Crying brings people together.

Regrettably, crying is stigmatized. Stigmatized, it is linked to all manner of dysfunctional behaviors and traits and dynamics.

For example, we associate crying with affective dysregulation, with people being out of control, with crazy making, with manipulation.

Crying is often cast as fake and manipulative. And crying is closely associated with negative affects such as shame.

So it's shameful to cry. It's disgraceful.

And it's also a gender thing. It's part of gender stereotyping and gender roles.

Boys don't cry. Or boys who do cry, cry in highly specific ways within highly legitimate and well-defined environments, for example, therapy.

So, crime is highly proscribed and prescribed by society, by the dominant culture, hegemony culture. And it's therefore no longer a spontaneous behavior.

Because spontaneity has been taken out of crime, crime has become a suspect. Crime has become not a genuine authentic message or signal.

It's regrettable that we have tainted and contaminated crime with this overriding ulterior motivations and analysis because at the core at the foundation crying is probably the most genuine authentic spontaneous real true behavior as I mentioned babies cry possibly it's the first behavior ever when a baby is taken out of the womb when a baby is born the first thing a baby does is cry.

I know that it is a physiological, mechanical thing. But still, it's the first discernible human behavior. Animals, some animals cry as well.

And yet we, in our hyper-masculinized society, combative, aggressive civilization, we regard crying as a sign of weakness, fragility, invulnerability.

And when we cry, we open the door to exploitation by predators and to maltreatment by abuses. Crying has become a risky behavior.

If you cry in public, you stand the risk of attracting to you very unsavory characters who would leverage your moment of weakness, your crime, would leverage it to penetrate your defenses and then abscond with everything you have.

So people abstain from crying because they're afraid. Crying has become associated with fear.


So when is it okay? When is it okay individually? When is it okay socially? When is it self-efficacious to cry? When is it a good idea? When is it likely to bring positive outcomes?

Number one, cry, feel free to cry only in a friendly environment.

Never ever cry in an environment which is indifferent to you, strange, foreign, or hostile, especially hostile.

If the environment you're embedded in or you find yourself is such that you are an unknown, that these are people you've met for the first time, or is a hostile environment, for example, prison or the army, you know, crying is a seriously bad idea. It's like saying, you know, it opens the floodgates.

Crying is a portal. Crying is a portal. Crying is a gate, and you are the gatekeeper.

Once you cry, you're opening yourself wide to intrusion, invasion, and a kind of intimacy or instant merger and fusion. These are highly, highly vulnerable positions.

So cry only when you're surrounded by friends. Never cry in front of potential enemies or predators.

Number two, when you're alone, allow yourself to cry. Even if it is an act of self-pity or self-soothing, seek relief through crying. It's a good idea. It's always a good idea to cry when you're alone.

Crying has all these impacts. Hormonal, by the way, hormonal and biochemical as well.

Crying is a great way of purging yourself, of all negativity, of reframing and regaining perspective about what has happened and what is about to happen, and about becoming your own best friend, self-soothing, self-comfiting, and yes, self-pity and self-empathizing.

Hug yourself metaphorically, if not otherwise, and allow yourself to wallow in crying.

Number three, when crying is likely to avert or avoid or modify circumstances and behaviors that might lead to adverse outcomes or might engender a situation which is dangerous or unfavorable, then cry.

In other words, if by crying, you avert or avoid or modify circumstances and behaviors that might lead to adverse outcomes, cry.

If by crying, you can engender or foster succor, support, advice and help, cry by all means.

We are all at one time or another in need of succor, support, advice and help. We are all in need of this type of human communication and human touch and the sharing of the common experience of being human. We're all in need of empathy.

Solicit it, ask for it, and the most effective way of doing this is through your tear ducts.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Reaction Formation: Why White Supremacists Attack LGBTQIA+

Reaction formation is a psychological defense mechanism where individuals behave in a way that denies their hidden feelings and motivations, which they find unacceptable. This defense mechanism is often exaggerated, compulsive, and intended to overcompensate for anxiety related to socially unacceptable thoughts and emotions. Reaction formation is commonly seen in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder, paranoia, and social activists with high narcissistic and psychopathic tendencies. To help someone with reaction formation, it is important to provide a supportive environment, legitimize their true feelings, and show them that their real feelings are more socially acceptable than their reaction formation behaviors.


Jokes, Humor: Sadistic, Cruel, Weaponized (Excerpt)

The comic relies on a lack of empathy, where laughter often stems from the misfortunes and humiliations of others, allowing observers to feel superior and detached from the pain depicted. Jokes serve a sadistic function, providing gratification from the suffering of others while restoring a sense of cosmic order and safety for the audience. Additionally, humor acts as a therapeutic outlet, channeling socially unacceptable impulses and fostering self-awareness by reflecting on potential vulnerabilities. Ultimately, jokes create a socially sanctioned space for expressing darker aspects of human nature, facilitating bonding and intimacy among those who share in the laughter.


(Psychological) Resistance Not Futile, Just Bad FOR YOU

Resistance is a psychological defense mechanism that individuals use to cope with uncomfortable or egodystonic information about themselves, often leading to cognitive distortions and self-deception. It manifests in various forms, including comfort zone preservation, resistance to insights that induce dread, cognitive distortions that uphold an inflated self-image, and the defense of personal narratives that provide meaning and structure. Both individual and collective resistances can lead to negative outcomes, as they often result in aggression and conflict, either internalized or externalized. Understanding the deeper psychological processes behind these resistances is crucial for fostering healthier interactions and reducing negative affectivity in both personal and societal contexts.


4 Ways to Reject Reality (Denial: Root of all Failure)

Denial is a conscious defense mechanism that prevents individuals from acknowledging unpleasant realities, leading to a cycle of unresolved issues and repeated failures. It operates alongside other psychological mechanisms such as repression, dissociation, and delusion, which serve to manage emotional conflicts and overwhelming experiences. When denial fails, individuals may resort to dissociation or delusion, ultimately retreating into fantasy as a means of escaping intolerable realities. This progression highlights the importance of confronting and processing difficult emotions and experiences to avoid the detrimental effects of these defense mechanisms on personal growth and mental health.


Is It Obsession or Attention?

Obsession is a self-directed, involuntary state characterized by intrusive thoughts and fantasies that dominate one's mental processes, often leading to compulsive behaviors. It is fundamentally different from attention, which is a voluntary focus on others and facilitates communication. While obsession narrows one's cognitive and emotional scope, attention broadens it, allowing for engagement with the external world. Ultimately, obsession can be seen as a form of internalized aggression that disrupts one's ability to interact meaningfully with reality.


Falsify Reality, Deny Yourself: Primitive Defense Mechanisms (NEW Intro+Compilation)

Psychological defense mechanisms serve to protect individuals from inner conflict and anxiety by distorting reality, allowing them to feel more comfortable in their own skin. They operate by denying, projecting, or reframing unacceptable thoughts and feelings, often leading to behaviors that mask true emotions. Key mechanisms include splitting, projection, and reaction formation, which can manifest in various ways, such as idealizing or devaluing others, or exhibiting extreme behaviors to counter hidden impulses. While these mechanisms can be adaptive, they can also become maladaptive, leading to significant psychological issues when they interfere with reality testing and interpersonal relationships.


When the Narcissist's Parents Die

The death of a narcissist's parents can be a complicated experience. The narcissist has a mixed reaction to their passing, feeling both elation and grief. The parents are often the source of the narcissist's trauma and continue to haunt them long after they die. The death of the parents also represents a loss of a reliable source of narcissistic supply, which can lead to severe depression. Additionally, the narcissist's unfinished business with their parents can lead to unresolved conflicts and pressure that deforms their personality.


How to Resolve (T)horny Dilemmas

A dilemma arises from holding two contradictory beliefs or courses of action, creating cognitive dissonance. To resolve a dilemma, one must analyze each option by identifying the associated problem, need, and underlying assumption, ultimately focusing on which need is more compelling. If both needs are equally strong, the resolution lies in reassessing and potentially changing the assumptions that drive the fears and anxieties. By applying a structured analysis and maintaining a cool head, individuals can navigate their dilemmas more effectively.


Religion of the Obsessive-compulsive: Orphaned Internal Objects

Obsessive patients create internal objects to represent their thoughts and emotions, leading to a disconnect between their internal reality and external reality, resulting in feelings of helplessness and anxiety. They externalize their intrusive thoughts, perceiving them as aggressive external objects, and engage in rituals to mitigate the anxiety associated with these thoughts, effectively transferring the aggression back onto themselves. This cycle of projection and internalization creates a perpetual state of conflict, where the patient oscillates between feeling all good and all bad, ultimately leading to emotional dysregulation. The treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorders requires addressing the core issue of aggression directly, rather than relying on rituals or magical thinking, which only perpetuate the cycle of obsession and compulsion.


Anxiety: Root Of OCD, Paranoia, Panic Attacks

Panic attacks and anxiety attacks create a sense of loss of control and anticipation of impending doom, whether internal or external, but once the attack subsides, individuals often feel relief and regain a sense of control. This pattern is mirrored in obsessive-compulsive disorders, where individuals engage in rituals to fend off perceived threats, and in paranoia, where grandiosity serves as a defense against anticipated malevolence. Anxiety is fundamentally different from fear; it is a counterfactual response to imagined scenarios rather than a reaction to real threats, leading to a cycle of anticipatory anxiety that can become addictive. Ultimately, individuals with anxiety disorders may prefer the familiarity of anxiety, as it provides a sense of comfort and control, prompting them to trigger anxiety even in calm moments to return to their comfort zone.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy