Background

Why Narcissist Distrusts You ( Ontological Insecurity)

Uploaded 9/30/2022, approx. 10 minute read

I am just back from my Cold Therapy Seminar in Touno, Chiviv, in Romania, a great seminar with the best audience, the liveliest and the loveliest I have ever had.

And I am proceeding from here to Budapest in October. More precisely, I have availability between the 20th and the 23rd of October, should any one of you wish to have a counseling, face-to-face, in-person session. And I am also available in Vienna on the 10th of October for identical purposes.


One of the things that bother me a lot in psychology is that we tend to discard old concepts, concepts whose time have come. We throw out the old and we bring in the new. We have zero institutional memory.

For example, very few people remember the work of Anthony Giddens. In the description area, you will find references to his work and to other people who have continued his work. It's an amazing body of studies, essays, contemplation and field research. And it dealt with the issue of ontological insecurity in the reflexive self.

These are the topics of today's lecture.

We start with ontological insecurity. It is an existential issue. It is about a person's sense of being in the world. Ontology.

An ontologically insecure person does not accept the reality or the existence of things, of themselves, of others.

And if this reminds you a lot of narcissism, it's for good reasons because narcissists are ontologically insecure. They can't perceive other people as external objects. They interact only with internal objects, interjects within their mind.

And even there, there is a gap, a lacuna, a void, an emptiness the narcissist cannot even perceive himself as some sort of entity. There is a problem even on this level.

So as far as a narcissist is concerned, existence itself is in doubt.

The ontologically secure person has a stable, unquestioned sense of self, has a stable, unquestioned sense of his or her place in the world in relation to other people and objects.

Now the concept of ontological insecurity is very important if we want to understand, if we wish to understand the related concept of identity.

It is an existential approach to identity because ontological security is the essential foundation for someone to achieve a stable sense of self identity.

Again, existentially speaking, if a person doesn't believe that he or she exists, if a person doesn't believe that other people are real, if a person even doubts the existence of objects, that person becomes solipsistic. It does not have the necessary foundation to develop a stable self identity.

Ontological insecurity is at the heart and core of identity disturbance in both borderline and narcissistic personality disorders.

You see, most people accomplish a sense of ontological security. They are sure they're pretty certain that they exist as separate entities. They're pretty certain that other people exist, separate from themselves. They have accomplished, most people have accomplished separation from mother and then individuation.

Not so, the narcissist. And this basic acceptance of the existence of oneself and the existence of others allows people to function in day to day life, allows them to maintain reality testing.

Narcissists are dysfunctional and they have no reality testing or proper reality testing.


But how do you go about accomplishing ontological security? How do we acquire this belief in the continuity, reliability and consistency of oneself, of other people, of things out there in the world? How do you avoid becoming a psychotic on the one end of the spectrum and the narcissist on the other?

Both the psychotic and the narcissist confuse external objects with internal objects and consequently they are not sure that anything exists internally or externally. The lines are blurred and everything becomes fuzzy and fog-ridden.

To develop ontological security, a person must first trust. Erikson called it basic trust. The person must learn to trust, develop a generalized sense of trust in the nature and stability of social structures, environments, the world out there and the world in here.

And this type of generalized trust is established in childhood and maintained through experience and routine.

It is well documented that good parenting or good enough parenting engenders in children a sense of trust in others and in things out there in the world.

Through consistency in parenting practices, unconditional love coupled with firm boundaries setting and discipline, these kind of practices teach children that other people, especially adults, can be trusted and that through practice they could become almost perfect.

Children through routine obtain a sense of the reliability and stability of social and physical world structures.

And so people who are healthy, people who are relatively normal, have gone through a phase in childhood of separating from the parent and yet the parent had acted as a secure base, fostering secure attachment later in life and people carry this generalized sense of well-being and trust with them into adulthood and it protects them against existential angst, against anxiety.

Establishment of flexible, not rigid, not obsessive, but flexible routines is also important as adults for maintaining a general sense of trust and for reducing anxiety and this is at the core of what we call self-identity, both the establishment of self-identity and the ongoing lifelong task of maintaining your self-identity.

Now generalized trust is acquired in early childhood but it has to be reaffirmed. It has to be confirmed by repeated experiences with other people, time and again lifelong throughout the lifespan. It is not ensured, it is not immutable or unchanging, it could be lost at any minute as many victims of abuse would demonstrate.

Research has shown that accidents, unexpected life events, traumas can undermine this basic trust and threaten the person's ontological security and what I'm trying to say is that you can easily switch from being ontologically secure to being ontologically insecure.

Anthony Giddens' theory of self-identity is based on this premise of ontological security.

We will discuss his reflexive self-concept a bit later in this lecture.

Giddens argues that the processes of late modernity and post-modernity have eroded many of the traditions that have underpinned trust in the nature and stability of the social and material world.

He says that modern life is inherently ontologically insecure because it had dispensed with all the traditions which were the foundations, constituted the foundations of our ontological security in pre-modern societies.

This is very reminiscent of many of the claims made by Jordan Peterson.

Whereas pre-modern societies are characterized by tradition, religion, routine and therefore meaning, it's easy to make sense of pre-modern societies.

Modern societies are characterized by rapid cycling, enormous change, uncertainty and indeterminacy in every field of life, economy, employment, culture, family, institutions, beliefs, values, you name it, everything is in flux, pantabé.

There are many psychological and psychosocial threats in modern life. There's an inbuilt instability.

Growth in essence is change and our whole way of life is founded on consumerism which is intended to guarantee growth.

But I repeat, growth is change. Growth is instability in work, in family life, in employment, you name it, in education.

A person needs to develop the ability to take for granted something, some everyday happenings, other people, material goods, the need to take for granted is another way of describing ontological security.

People who do not become caught in a perpetual state of anxiety about the future are people who are ontologically secure.

So the desire and the need to manage potential threats, to avoid risks, this desire and need have become the cornerstones of our modern existence.

We are battling off anxiety and risk and threats all the time and this raises fundamental issues of can we trust others, can we trust institutions, can we trust the world and if we can't, if the answer is no we cannot, what does our identity consist of?

Our identity consists of our interactions with other people. Our identity is relational, it's social, it's interpersonal but modern individuals cannot have an identity by definition because there's no one out there to rely on and to trust.

And to manage this overwhelming insecurity, to manage this dysregulating indeterminacy and in a way unpredictability and capriciousness embedded in day-to-day living, we develop all kinds of dysfunctional strategies to achieve and to maintain a status or a state of ontological security.

And ironically it is exactly by deploying these strategies that we reduce the certainty in our lives and increase ontological insecurity.

In other words our strategies are self-defeating and self-destructive.


One of the processes identified by Anthony Giddens is reflexivity.

Individuals respond to social change and to the resulting insecurity by engaging with expert systems and by using information to assess their positions in the social and material worlds that they inhabit.

In other words individuals rely on information to position themselves and this process of positioning endows them with some kind of awe. I know where I stand I can feel safe.

By placing themselves in their own fields of view and by assessing their positions in social and material worlds which they inhabit, individuals can be assured of their own existence and manage the risks associated with modern life according to the Encyclopedia of Identity.

But if we take this to extreme which most of us are forced to do because the rate of change is so ginormous that we are forced to implement these strategies habitually, automatically, recurrently, it's out of control.

So if this is taken to extreme the process of reflection itself can and does generate anxiety.

An ontologically secure person does not need to engage in a process of reflection.

If you are ontologically secure, healthy and normal you don't reflect on the question whether other people exist. You don't reflect on yourself within your field of view. You don't need to position yourself. You just are.

Being and becoming have become belabored processes requiring investment, commitment, reflection and mirroring.

This is abnormal. We should be able to trust and accept things as they are without having to go through a layer of cognition.

This is again at the core of narcissism because the narcissist is one cognitive layer removed from himself and from the world. He has to think about things in order to conceptualize self-reflexivity and the ability to engage in the process of self-reflexivity.

These are partly structurally determined by the environment but they vary depending on class, gender, ethnicity and mental health or lack thereof.

And so the concept of ontological security is important because it suggests that people need more than just material needs.


So in order to feel happy or even functional, in order to have fulfilled lives or self-actualized lives to borrow Abraham Maslow's term, you need to be ontologically secure because if you are insecure, you are not able to develop and maintain a stable sense of self-identity.

You have trouble negotiating and feeding in society and other aspects of the world that you reside in could be material aspects, could be other people.

This ontological insecurity this has a profound impact, your inability to trust the universe so to speak. That affects your well-being.

There's research that indicates that ontological insecurity is associated with poor physical and mental health, with offending behavior, with housing instability and insecurity, with national conflict, with mental health disorders such as narcissism, schizoid, paranoid and borderline personality disorder.

So this is the concept of ontological insecurity. In the description you will find literature about this concept.


The next video will be dedicated to another one of Anthony Giddens' revolutionary concepts at the time and that is the reflexive self.

It is such a pity that we discard yesterday's concepts and ideas as so much used laundry because there's such vast richness in the last hundred years of psychology that we no longer have access to. We have excluded from curricula and syllabi all over the world and our youth, our young ones, they are no longer exposed to these riches, these treasures and I'm doing my best to reintroduce them through my videos with the limited appeal that they have.

Thank you for listening and proceed now to the next lecture about the reflexive self.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Free Yourself from Tyranny of Your Ego Ideal (Boredom, Culture)

Socialization and acculturation shape our identities through the absorption of external values and norms, often leading to an attribution error where we mistakenly believe these influences are intrinsic to us. The ego ideal, a construct formed from societal expectations and external influences, can create internal conflict and feelings of shame when we fail to meet its unrealistic standards. While the ego ideal may motivate us to achieve, it can also become a tyrannical force that distorts our self-perception and leads to self-betrayal. To live authentically, it is essential to recognize and modify the ego ideal to align with our true selves, rather than conforming to imposed societal expectations.


Narcissist's, Borderline's Children Dystopia: Our Post-modern World (with Prabhã Calderon)

The concept of the self has evolved from a unitary, immutable entity to a more fragmented understanding, likening the self to a theater troupe with multiple responsive entities. This fragmentation is influenced by various psychological theories and highlights the importance of monitoring both internal and external environments. Individuals with borderline and narcissistic disorders struggle with identity and emotional regulation, often relying on external sources for validation and stability, which can lead to maladaptive behaviors. While therapeutic approaches can improve their quality of life, the core issues stemming from their developmental experiences remain largely unchangeable.


No Emotions, please: Alexithymia and Anankastia (Rigid Perfectionism)

Alexithymia is characterized by an inability to recognize and articulate emotions, which can lead to significant interpersonal difficulties and a superficial understanding of relationships. It is linked to Anancastia, a form of perfectionism that emphasizes rigid control over emotions and behaviors, often resulting in emotional detachment and a lack of empathy. The connection between alexithymia and various personality disorders, particularly narcissism, suggests that both conditions share underlying emotional processing issues and may stem from similar developmental experiences. Additionally, alexithymia can manifest as a coping mechanism in response to trauma or adverse childhood experiences, leading individuals to suppress their emotions to avoid vulnerability. Overall, the interplay between alexithymia, emotional regulation, and personality disorders highlights the complex nature of emotional awareness and its critical role in forming meaningful relationships.


Overwhelmed by Emotions: Affective Dysregulation in Borderlines, Narcissists

Emotional dysregulation, often associated with borderline and narcissistic personality disorders, is characterized by a failure of internal regulatory mechanisms, leading to intense emotional responses triggered by both positive and negative affects. There are two main types of emotional dysregulation: anticipatory, which arises from anxiety and catastrophizing about potential negative outcomes, and reactive, which occurs in response to actual events like abandonment or humiliation. This dysregulation is distinct from emotional chaos or instability, as it reflects a lack of regulation rather than an amplification of emotions, and is often exacerbated by impaired emotional cognition and the inability to accurately appraise situations. The interplay between emotional dysregulation and intimacy highlights how close relationships can amplify feelings of threat and vulnerability, further complicating the emotional landscape for individuals with these disorders.


Separate 3 Times, Become YOU!

The process of separation and individuation occurs in three distinct phases throughout life: infancy, adolescence, and adulthood, each leading to the formation of a self-state. In infancy, a loving and accepting mother fosters an autonomous self-state, while strict or neglectful parenting can hinder this development. During adolescence, the formation of a peer self-state is influenced by the ability to reject parental figures, with healthy individuation resulting in a defiant identity, whereas disruption leads to conformity. Finally, in adulthood, the social self-state emerges through interactions with others, where healthy boundary-setting fosters collaboration, while impediments can result in avoidant behaviors, linking disrupted individuation processes to various mental health pathologies.


Narcissists Uses You In Unfinished Mommy Splitting

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the concept of splitting in psychology, specifically ego splitting and object splitting. Narcissists and borderlines use splitting as a defense mechanism, but when faced with a mother who is all bad, splitting becomes inverted and the child splits themselves into a true self and a false self. Narcissists have no ego and outsource ego functions, leading to a dissociative and dysfunctional state. They also use projective identification to gain an illusion of control over objects and gain vicarious satisfaction from their activities.


People are Like Trees: Roots and Obstacles (by Jennifer Howard)

Humans adapt to obstacles in their environment similarly to how trees navigate around physical barriers, allowing for continued growth despite challenges. Psychopathologies serve as adaptive mechanisms that help individuals achieve a functional equilibrium, even if the resulting personality configurations are considered abnormal. The resilience of life forces enables individuals to develop personality structures that meet their needs while responding to external constraints. Ultimately, personal growth and development persist until death, with life experiences shaping the intricate fabric of personality.


Self-states, Unmet Needs in Narcissists, Borderlines

The self is a unique internal object that maintains constant communication with other internal objects, providing order and structure within the psyche, while other internal objects have limited and intermittent communication. Self-states are fragments of the self that arise in response to unmet needs, and they become activated during stress or emotional turmoil, reflecting the individual's coping strategies. When needs are satisfied, these self-states can merge back into the integrated self, but when needs remain unmet, they persist as separate entities, leading to fragmentation and identity disturbance. The dynamics of self-states involve complex interactions with internal objects, often resulting in conflict and emotional turmoil, particularly in individuals with personality disorders.


The Habit of Identity

The experiment with the lemon illustrates how humans form habits and bonds with objects and others, often mistaking these habits for their true identity. While habits provide comfort and a sense of well-being, they are superficial and do not constitute one's deeper identity, which remains unchanged despite the loss of these habits. True identity is rooted in personality, a dynamic and evolving pattern of reactions to the environment, which allows for growth and change. Individuals with personality disorders, however, become rigid in their habits, losing their sense of self and the ability to love or adapt, ultimately hindering their capacity to live fully.


Freud's Shadow over Modern Psychology (South East European University, SEEU)

Development is a continuous process influenced by daily experiences and stimuli, yet information processing theory lacks clarity on who is responsible for this processing and how it connects to personal growth. The theory treats humans as passive entities, akin to computers, neglecting the self-awareness and introspection that characterize human experience. In contrast, psychoanalytic theories, particularly those of Freud and Klein, emphasize the importance of interpersonal relationships and the unconscious in shaping identity and development. Ultimately, integrating insights from both information processing and psychoanalytic theories could provide a more comprehensive understanding of human psychology.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy