Background

Can People Switch Between Incompatible Disorders (Narcissist, Psychopath, Borderline)?

Uploaded 3/20/2024, approx. 7 minute read

Are you doing in my bathroom? Do you have no limits? No inhibitions? No boundaries?

I know. I know how irresistible I am. Still, you know, let me take you to my office and answer some of your persistent questions and disentangle your bafflement.

So many of you have asked me about my recent video. You said, "If the borderline becomes a secondary psychopath, does she also transition from purposefulness to intentionality? Does she then act intentionally?" Similarly, the narcissist doesn't have a self. The psychopath has a self. The narcissist is interested only in narcissistic supply. The psychopath is interested in many other things, sex, power, money, etc., etc.

What happens when the narcissist transitions to a psychopathic self-state or becomes a psychopath? Does he then develop overnight an instantaneous self and does he then become interested in, I don't know, money, power, sex, etc. Cool your heels. Let me explain to you the source of your confusion.

Every mental health diagnosis has three elements. One is known as etiology, the causation, the reason for the evolution and development of the mental illness. The second part is the psychodynamics, the psychological internal processes which bring on the manifested illness, the way the illness manifests in specific cognitions, specific emotions or lack thereof, no emotions, etc.

So these are the psychodynamics. And the third element is behavioral, behaviors that are intimately and sometimes exclusively linked to highly specific mental health issues, disorders and illnesses.

To satisfy your diagnosis, all three elements must be present.

Etiology, how did the disorder or the illness come about? The personal history of the patient, an amnesis, the childhood, adverse childhood experiences, parental background, etc., etc.

So etiology, the psychodynamics, cognitions of the patient, emotions of the patient, impulses, inhibitions, etc., all the internal mechanism of the patient.

And the third element, how does the patient behave? Does the behavior of the patient conform to the behaviors expected in this particular disorder or illness? And usually these behaviors are listed in diagnostic manuals, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual and the International Classification of Diseases, the ICD and the DSM.

Okay, that's the background.

What happens when we have comorbidities, when two or more mental illnesses, for example, when two or more personality disorders are diagnosed in the same person? For example, what happens when the patient is diagnosed with both narcissistic personality disorder and antisocial personality disorder or psychopathy?

Which of the two prevail? And the answer is that there is always a dominant disorder and a recessive disorder. There's always a disorder that defines the patient's psychodynamic and dictates most of the patient's behaviors.

And there's a disorder that is in the background and that contributes to the behaviors of the patient only when the patient is exposed to extreme stress, anxiety, crisis, circumstances, and changing environments.

So this is the background.

Now, let's, for example, take a psychopathic narcissist, a malignant narcissist. That is considered to be a comorbidity of narcissism, psychopathy, and sadism.

How can we tell when the person is a sadist, when this kind of person, the malignant narcissist, is a psychopath, when he's a narcissist, and so on?

The answer is that the dominant disorder in this case is actually narcissism. Gradiosity, entitlement, envy, exploitativeness, etc. Narcissism dominates. And the main goal or motivation of the patient is to secure a regular flow of narcissistic supply.

However, the malignant narcissist secures the supply by deploying, employing, leveraging, and using psychopathic behaviors. So the malignant narcissist would behave the way a psychopath does, but with a goal of obtaining narcissistic supply.

It's an example of how a comorbidity operates. Similarly, someone with a borderline personality disorder is likely to transition to a secondary psychopathic self-state when she decompensates or acts out.

That's very common, actually. Well, in this case, does she become a full-fledged psychopath? Of course not. Her dominant disorder is borderline personality. Her personality organization is a borderline organization. However, when she transitions to a secondary psychopathic self-state, she is likely to behave the way a psychopath does. She is likely even to display traits of a psychopath to some extent.

For example, she is likely to become reckless or defined, but she still would be a borderline. She would experience shame and guilt after the episode. Throughout the episode, she would depersonalize, derealize, dissociate, etc. These are all hallmarks of borderline, not of psychopathy.


Similarly, a question about reality.

The psychopath is reality-attuned. His reality testing is relatively intact. Not fully intact, but relatively intact. Compared to the narcissist, the psychopath is fully grounded in reality and can tell the difference between reality and fantasy, which a narcissist cannot.

So when we have a malignant narcissist, a psychopathic narcissist, can he or can't he tell when he is in reality and when he is in fantasy?

The answer is it's a narcissist, so he cannot tell the difference between reality and fantasy. His reality testing is severely impaired, is unable to grasp reality as it is. He distorts reality cognitively.

So when we have comorbidities, one of the disorders is the major disorder. It is the outcome of the patient's etiology and an amnesis and personal history and autobiography. This dominant disorder dictates the psychological dynamics inside the patient, inner processes, thought processes, cognitions, emotions, and so on.

And yet the patient is capable of behaving in ways which are typical of another disorder.

So if we have a narcissist who is a malignant narcissist, a psychopathic narcissist, is capable of behaving the way a psychopath does. And so does the borderline. So when we talk about transitioning to self-states, when we talk about narcissists who can become a psychopath, a borderline who can become a psychopath, a psychopath who can become a narcissist, when we talk about these kind of transitions, especially after states of collapse, we are talking merely and only and exclusively about behaviors, coping strategies.

So we are not talking about etiology, we are not talking about psychological processes and dynamics. We are therefore not talking about the totality of the disorder. We are talking only about behaviors.

A narcissist could begin to behave as a psychopath does, and yet it doesn't make the narcissist a psychopath. A borderline can display psychopathic behaviors and even attitudes and even traits. It doesn't make her a psychopath. A psychopath can suddenly become super grandiose entitled, indulge in fantasy, extract narcissistic supply, etc. These are all narcissistic behaviors. They don't render the psychopath a narcissist.

I hope you got a picture. In a variety of mental health disorders, especially personality disorders, in times of crisis, in times of anxiety, of stress, of tension, changing circumstances, adverse environment, in these situations, the person transitions, but the patient does not transition from one personality disorder to another personality disorder. He doesn't develop full fledged alternative. He simply adopts behaviors borrowed from other disorders.


Similarly, the narcissist, when he's exposed to narcissistic modification, becomes as dysregulated as a borderline, emotionally dysregulated, develops suicidal ideation.

So these are borderline behaviors and traits, and yet it doesn't make the narcissist a borderline. He just borrows borderline mechanisms or borderline behaviors temporarily.

And the last point, and very important point, is these self-states are temporary. They're not permanent.

When the narcissist begins to behave like a psychopath, he doesn't become a psychopath. It's a phase. It passes. It's transitional.

When a borderline decompensates and acts out and switches to a secondary psychopathic state, it's temporary. It can take a day or two, a few hours, and she's back to her old self. When a psychopath becomes a narcissist, it's reactive. It takes a few hours and he's back to being a psychopath.

And when a narcissist's following modification begins to dysregulate emotionally, it's again limited in time. It's self-limiting. It's limited in time. It may take a few weeks, a few months, a few days, and it's over. And he's again, his old grandiose, intractable, untreatable, hopeless, incorrigible self.

In short, mwah.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10)

The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) has evolved significantly since its inception, particularly in its approach to mental health disorders. The ICD-8 introduced a descriptive and operational framework but struggled with issues of comorbidity and diagnostic clarity. The ICD-10 improved upon this by incorporating extensive research and providing multiple sets of diagnostic criteria tailored for different users, including practitioners and researchers. Despite some criticisms regarding its reliability for diagnosing personality disorders, there remains potential for further development and refinement of the ICD.


How Dark Tetrads Confuse Your Therapist, Coach

Differential diagnosis is crucial for distinguishing between various mental illnesses, particularly cluster B personality disorders, which are often misrepresented by self-styled experts. Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a legitimate diagnosis that is being redefined to emphasize emotional dysregulation and its post-traumatic aspects, while complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) is transient and distinct from the lifelong nature of BPD. Additionally, the lecture highlights the importance of understanding the nuances between different types of psychopaths and the characteristics of dark tetrad personalities, emphasizing that traits like grandiosity, cruelty, and lack of introspection are not exclusive to any single disorder. Accurate diagnosis requires in-depth assessment and understanding of the complexities of human behavior, rather than superficial observations.


New Light on Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) in DSM-5-TR and ICD-11

Psychology is currently in turmoil with new diagnostic texts, definitions, and clinical insights. The DSM-5 text revision and the ICD-11 both offer new approaches to understanding borderline personality disorder (BPD). The distinction between complex trauma and BPD is blurry, and some scholars argue that various personality disorders, including narcissistic and borderline, should be considered post-traumatic conditions. The ICD-11 has moved towards a dimensional approach, focusing on aspects like identity, empathy, and antagonism, suggesting that all personality disorders may be part of a single underlying clinical entity.


GREAT NEWS New Treatments, BPD Redefined ( Borderline Personality Disorder Literature Review)

Recent research has revealed significant advancements in the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder (BPD), challenging previous misconceptions about its diagnosis and management. Notably, a study demonstrated that individuals with BPD do not need to engage in self-harm or suicidal behavior to qualify for the diagnosis, emphasizing the importance of emotional dysregulation as a key criterion. Additionally, new treatment modalities, such as combined individual and group schema therapy, have shown promise in effectively reducing BPD symptoms, while early interventions focusing on clinical case management rather than psychotherapy may be more beneficial for young patients. Overall, these findings suggest a shift towards a more nuanced and hopeful approach to diagnosing and treating BPD, highlighting the need for greater awareness and understanding among clinicians.


Borderline's Miracle Healing

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is less prevalent than commonly believed, affecting about 1-2% of the general population, yet it accounts for a significant portion of mental health treatment cases due to crises. The prognosis for BPD is generally positive, with many individuals experiencing spontaneous remission or significant improvement through therapies like Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), leading to a high percentage of patients no longer meeting diagnostic criteria over time. While symptoms related to impulsivity and behavior tend to remit more quickly, some underlying traits and dysfunctional behaviors may persist even after the disorder itself has resolved. Effective treatment should not only address the core symptoms of BPD but also focus on helping individuals develop functional skills for social and vocational success, particularly in younger populations.


Personality or Gut Disorders? Microbiome and Mental Illness

The gut microbiome plays a crucial role in mental health, influencing not only brain function but also personality and temperament through a bidirectional relationship. This relationship suggests that gut bacteria can affect emotional states and behaviors, while psychological conditions can alter gut microbiota composition. Research indicates that disturbances in gut bacteria are linked to various psychiatric disorders, including borderline personality disorder, and that early life factors, such as maternal gut health, can impact the development of these conditions. The interconnectedness of bodily systems challenges traditional views of mental health, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach to treatment that considers the gut-brain axis. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of gut health in understanding and potentially treating mental health issues.


5 Axes of Mental Health or Mental Illness

In the 19th century, psychiatry attempted to establish itself as a branch of medicine by correlating observable patient behaviors with brain abnormalities found during autopsies, with figures like Charcot and Freud leading this effort. Freud's transition from neuroanatomy to psychoanalysis marked a shift from objective observations to speculative inquiries about the mind, which has led to ongoing challenges in replicating psychological studies and defining mental health. A proposed five-axis model for assessing mental health includes social functioning, inhibition, professional functioning, interpersonal relationships, and emotional regulation, emphasizing observable behaviors over speculative internal processes. The need for careful labeling and diagnosis in psychology is crucial, as misidentification can lead to misunderstandings of mental health conditions.


Reframing YOU in Narcissist's Shared Fantasy

Human beings, particularly the youth, are experiencing unprecedented levels of emotional and relational dysfunction, characterized by anxiety, depression, and substance abuse, leading to a concerning trend of sexlessness and unhealthy sexual behaviors. One-night stands are criticized for fostering superficial connections that inhibit true intimacy and often reflect narcissistic and psychopathic traits, as supported by numerous studies linking these behaviors to dark triad personality traits. The narcissist's manipulation of promiscuous partners involves reframing their behavior to maintain control and avoid abandonment, often infantilizing them and denying their agency. Upcoming discussions will explore compensatory narcissism and the similarities between psychopathy and high-functioning autism, highlighting the complexities of these psychological conditions.


What We are Getting Wrong About Mental Illness: Diagnostic Manuals are BROKEN

Professor Sam Vaknin argues that the current diagnostic manuals for mental health disorders, such as the DSM and ICD, are flawed and should be restructured into three parts based on the three phases of life: childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. He believes that mental health disorders should be categorized as brain abnormalities, relational/societal disorders, and innate disorders. Vaknin also questions the validity of antisocial personality disorder as a mental illness, suggesting that it may be more of a tool for social control rather than a proper clinical entity.


Mental Health Dictionary - Letter C

The lecture discusses various mental health concepts starting with the letter C, including catalypsy, catatonia, and compulsions. Catalypsy is characterized by the rigid maintenance of body positions, while catatonia encompasses a range of motoric abnormalities and was previously linked to schizophrenia but is now viewed as an affective disorder. Compulsions involve involuntary, repetitive actions that provide relief from anxiety, common in obsessive-compulsive disorders. The lecture also touches on concrete thinking, confabulation, and culture-bound syndromes, highlighting their significance in mental health diagnostics.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy