Background

Cyber (Internet) Narcissists and Psychopaths

Uploaded 8/10/2010, approx. 5 minute read

My name is Sam Vaknin. I am the author of Malignant Self-Love, Narcissism Revisited.

To the narcissist, the Internet is an alluring and irresistible combination of playground and hunting grounds. It is a gathering place of numerous potential sources of narcissistic supply of attention. It is a world where false identities are common, and mind games depend on. It is also beyond the reach of the law, beyond the pale of social norms, and beyond the strictures of civilized conduct.

In other words, as far as the narcissist is concerned, it is true paradise.

The somatic narcissist finds cybersex and cyberrelationships aplenty. The cerebral narcissist claims false accomplishments, he fakes skills, irreducian and talents.

Both these types of narcissists, the somatic and the cerebral, even when they are minimally communicative, end up at the instantly gratifying epicenter of a cult of fans, followers, stalkers, erotomania, denigrators, and plain nuts.

The constant attention and attendant quasi-celebrity feed and sustain the grandiose fantasies and the inflated self-image of the narcissist.

So, in a way, the Internet is an extension of the real-life narcissistic pathological space, the narcissist milieu and environment, offline.

But the Internet is without the risks, the injuries, the disappointments and the hurt that is common in reality.

In the virtual universe of the web, the narcissist vanishes and reappears with ease. He often adopts a myriad aliases, nicknames and handles.

The narcissist fends off criticism, abuse, disagreement and disapproval effectively in a real time by merely not being there anymore.

At the same time, he preserves the precarious balance of his infantile personality by reappearing or by pretending to be someone else.

Narcissists are therefore prone to Internet addiction. It fulfills many of their emotional needs.

The Internet of course has positive characteristics, but unfortunately they are largely lost on the narcissist.

He is not keen on expanding his horizons, on fostering true relationships with others, on getting in real contact with people.

The narcissist is forever the provincial in the Internet because he filters everything through the narrow lens of his addiction to narcissistic supply.

He measures others on the Internet, idealizes them or devalues them according to one criterion only, how useful they are at being sources of narcissistic supply. Can they be such sources or not?

The Internet is a egalitarian medium. People on the Internet are judged by the consistency, the quality of their contributions, not by the content or bombast of their claims.

But the narcissist is driven to distracting discomforture by a lack of clear and commonly accepted hierarchy with himself, of course, as a pinnacle.

So the Internet, this anarchic and democratic medium also discomforts the narcissist, makes him feel ill at ease.

So what the narcissist tries to do, he fervently and aggressively tries to impose the natural order with the narcissist at the top, either by monopolizing the discussion, monopolizing the interaction, or if this strategy fails by becoming a major disruptive influence.

But the Internet may also be the closest that the narcissist gets to psychodynamic therapy.

Because the Internet is largely anonymous, it is populated by sort of disembodied entities. By interacting with these intermittent, unpredictable and ultimately unknowable and ephemeral and ethereal voices, the narcissist is compelled to project unto others his own experiences, fears, hopes and prejudices.

He uses other people on the Internet to actually look at the mirror, to be reflected, to insult. Transference and counter-transference are quite common on the Internet.

And the narcissist's psychological defense mechanisms, notably projection and projective identification, are frequently aroused.

The therapeutic process is set in motion by the unbridled, unsensored, brutally honest reactions to the narcissist's reparatory.

People give feedback to the narcissist when he displays his antics, his pretensions, his delusions and his fantasies.

And never mind how painful this feedback is, it provokes the narcissist into thinking. It gives him insight.

And in this sense, it's remedial, it's therapeutic.

The narcissist, ever the intimidating bully, is not accustomed to such resistance.

Initially it may heighten and sharpen his paranoia and lead him to compensate by extending and deepening his grandiosity.

Some narcissists withdraw altogether from the Internet, reverting to a schizoid posture. They shun others. Other narcissists become openly antisocial and they seek to subvert, to sabotage and to destroy the online sources of their frustration.

A few narcissists retreat and confine themselves to the company of adoring psychophants and unquestioning groupies.

But a long exposure to the culture of the net, which is irreverent, skeptical and populist, usually exerts a beneficial effect, even on the staunchest and most rigid narcissist.

Far less convinced of their own superiority and infallibility, having been exposed to the Internet, some online narcissists meddle and begin hesitantly to listen to others, to actually collaborate with them.

Ultimately, most narcissists, those who are not schizoid and those who don't shun social content, most narcissists tire of the virtual reality that is cyberspace.

The typical narcissist needs tangible narcissistic supply, needs to look them in the eye, needs to press the flesh. He craves attention from real, live people, flesh and blood. He strives to see in their eyes their admiration and their relation. They awe and fear that he inspires the approval and affirmation that he elicits.

All this is not forthcoming from the Internet. There is no substitute to human contact even for the narcissist.

Many narcissists try to carry online relationships they nurtured into their logical extension. So they try to conclude them and consummate them offline. They try to meet the people they've interacted with on the net.

Other narcissists burst upon the cyber scene intermittently, vanishing for long months, only to dive back in and reinvigorate and then to disappear again.

Reality beckons that few narcissists can resist the siren call of offline.

They are therefore not true netizens. They are fly-by-night creatures.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Classifying Narcissists: Sanity and Masks

Narcissism is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that can be categorized into various typologies, including those proposed by scholars like Theodore Millon and Drew Westen. Millon identifies four types of narcissists: elitist, amorous, unprincipled, and compensatory, while Westen categorizes them into high-functioning, fragile, and grandiose types. The distinction between cerebral and somatic narcissists highlights how individuals derive their narcissistic supply either from intellect or physicality, with each type exhibiting unique behaviors and interpersonal dynamics. Additionally, the concept of inverted narcissism describes individuals who are codependent on narcissists, seeking validation and self-worth through their relationships with them. Overall, understanding these typologies is crucial for recognizing the diverse expressions of narcissism and their implications in interpersonal relationships.


Cerebral Narcissist: Woman? What's That For?

Somatic narcissists derive their self-worth from sexual conquests, while cerebral narcissists lack an understanding of sexual attraction and intimacy. The speaker describes a profound emptiness and inability to connect with others, leading to confusion and repulsion in relationships, as women sense his underlying dysfunction. This internal conflict between narcissism and a schizoid disposition creates a painful push-pull dynamic, where the desire for connection is overshadowed by an aversion to intimacy. Ultimately, the speaker feels like a hollow vessel, unable to engage meaningfully with others, resulting in a deep sense of alienation.


How Psychopath Sees YOU, Experiences Others

The psychopath perceives the world as a hostile environment where everyone is either a tool to be exploited or an obstacle to be eliminated, lacking emotional empathy and reducing others to mere objects. Their interactions are driven by a cold, utilitarian view, where they analyze individuals solely based on their utility, leading to a fixation on object identity that prevents them from recognizing the dynamic nature of human relationships. Psychopaths experience a profound dissociation, viewing themselves and others as objects, which results in a lack of self-awareness and emotional resonance, rendering them indifferent to the existence of others unless it serves their goals. Ultimately, their need for power and control stems from an underlying anxiety, compelling them to assert dominance over their environment and those within it.


Somatic Narcissist: Not Sex, But Pursuit and Conquest

Somatic narcissists derive their narcissistic supply from the process of securing sexual conquests rather than the act itself, finding validation in the chase and manipulation of their targets. They often exhibit their physical attributes and conquests, treating their bodies as objects to be sculpted, while displaying sadistic tendencies when coupled with psychopathy. In contrast, cerebral narcissists rely on their intellect for admiration and often neglect their physical selves, preferring solitary sexual gratification over intimate relationships. Both types exist within a narcissist, with one being dominant and the other recessive, leading to unpredictable shifts in behavior akin to a dual personality.


NOT Alpha Males: Narcissists and Psychopaths

The concept of the alpha male is often misrepresented in popular culture, particularly within the Manosphere, where it is associated with narcissism and psychopathy. Scholarly research suggests that true alpha males are not defined by aggression or dominance but rather by empathy, cooperation, and the ability to build coalitions. The alpha male emerges from a healthy upbringing that fosters emotional intelligence and self-awareness, contrasting sharply with the traits of narcissists and psychopaths, who are ultimately self-destructive and lack genuine self-efficacy. The alpha male's success is rooted in long-term strategies that prioritize collaboration and harmony, rather than short-term, reckless behaviors. Understanding the alpha male requires recognizing the importance of early life scripts and the distinction between healthy and unhealthy adaptations to social environments.


What Is Machiavellianism? (EXCERPT)

Machiavellianism is a personality trait characterized by manipulation, a calculating attitude towards relationships, and a belief that the ends justify the means, often leading to ruthless behavior. It exists on a spectrum, distinct from personality disorders like narcissism and psychopathy, and is associated with a lack of empathy and morality, as well as a focus on self-interest. High Machiavellians are strategic and goal-oriented, often using cold empathy to manipulate others without emotional investment, while low Machiavellians exhibit more morality and empathy. The trait can manifest in children as young as three, and its development is influenced by environmental factors, particularly paternal behavior, distinguishing it from the more rigid patterns seen in personality disorders.


Narcissist or Psychopath? What Are the Differences?

Narcissists and psychopaths share many traits, but there are important differences between the two. Psychopaths are less inhibited and less grandiose than narcissists, and they are unable or unwilling to control their impulses. Psychopaths are deliberately and gleefully evil, while narcissists are absentmindedly and incidentally evil. Narcissists are addicted to narcissistic supply, while psychopaths do not need other people at all.


Machiavellianism: NOT Psychopathy or Narcissism! (Starts 26:00): Dark (D) Factor, Cold Empathy

Machiavellianism is characterized by a calculating attitude towards human relationships, where individuals view others as tools to be manipulated for personal gain, often justifying unethical behavior with the belief that the ends justify the means. Covert personalities, such as covert narcissists and covert psychopaths, are reactive states that arise from failures to achieve their ideal selves, leading to obsessive fixation on approximating these ideals. The dark factor of personality, or D factor, reflects a tendency to prioritize self-interest while disregarding the well-being of others, resulting in behaviors that are often antisocial and exploitative. Unlike narcissists and psychopaths, Machiavellians are not impulsive; they are strategic and calculated, often lacking emotional investment in their relationships, which allows them to manipulate others without experiencing guilt or remorse.


Simple Trick: Tell Apart Narcissist, Psychopath, Borderline

Narcissists maintain one stable aspect of their lives, referred to as an "island of stability," while the rest of their existence is chaotic and disordered, leading to misconceptions about their character. In contrast, psychopaths lack any stable elements in their lives, resulting in pervasive instability across all dimensions. There are two types of narcissists: those who create compensatory stability by stabilizing one area of their life while everything else is chaotic, and those who enhance instability by introducing chaos into all aspects of their lives when one area is disrupted. The distinction between narcissists and psychopaths lies in their emotional engagement and the presence of stability, with narcissists relying on external validation while psychopaths operate without emotional depth or continuity.


Do Psychopaths Have Conscience, Morality Narcissists

Psychopaths and narcissists lack a true conscience, as their moral judgments are not motivated by empathy or an internalized sense of right and wrong. While they can recognize societal rules and may act in pro-social ways, their motivations are often superficial, driven by external factors rather than genuine moral conviction. Research indicates that psychopaths may understand moral concepts but do not feel compelled to act on them due to their lack of empathy, which prevents them from recognizing the significance of moral obligations. Ultimately, the distinction between moral and conventional transgressions is blurred for them, leading to a failure to internalize moral responsibility despite an awareness of societal norms.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy