Background

Never Forgive Infidelity, Cheating!

Uploaded 9/8/2023, approx. 8 minute read

You want to feel vindicated, if you want to validate your ignorance, your biases, your prejudices, your inanity, and in some cases your inborn, inbred stupidity, there's a coach for that.

There's a public intellectual who would tell you everything you want to hear, who would tell you that you're right, that you're great, that you're an intellectual giant, that the rest of the world is wrong, science is wrong, authority is wrong, expertise is wrong, history is wrong, only you are right.

And these kinds of coaches and public intellectuals laugh all the way to the bank and they make very frequent trips to the bank.

Trust you me.

On the back of this mass gullibility, there are public intellectuals who claim that cheating in a marriage, extramarital affairs, strain, deception, lies, concealment, they're all good things, they're therapeutic, they revive the marriage, they imbue it with spice, they resuscitate it. They make it sound as if cheating were an altruistic act, an act of love and the affirmation of the marriage vows.

And of course, I'm not talking only about marriage, I'm talking about committed relationships in general.

Affairs are known as extra dyadic, extra dyadic sex. We are talking about having sex with someone outside the couple when there has been an agreement between the members of the couple to maintain sexual exclusivity culminating in some cases in monogamy.

Yesterday, I published the following short text on Instagram.

If having an affair has revitalized your marriage, then your union has always been sick and dysfunctional based on deception, mistrust and object dependency.

A mentally healthy marriage, a mentally healthy relationship never, never survives an affair.

And this provoked a storm.

And of course, people were bandying about all kinds of public intellectuals who claimed that there's nothing wrong with cheating.

Cheating can inject a lot of verve and energy into a more abundant and dying relationship.

And that cheating is nothing but a form of acting out, a dysfunctional way of coping with the difficulties of togetherness.


First of all, allow me to clarify what is it that I'm talking about.

I'm referring to cheating and I'm using the word cheating judiciously.

Cheating is an affair with another person outside the couple.

An affair which involves deception, by the way, it doesn't have to be sexual, it would be emotional.

It involves deception.

I am not referring to an open marriage or an open relationship or polyamory or the lifestyle, aka swinging or cacondry.

I'm not referring to any of these practices because they do not involve deception, concealment, backstabbing, betrayal.

These are consensual arrangements.

Any arrangement between consenting adults, which involves no coercion of any kind and no harm whatsoever to others is perfectly legitimate as a way to pursue happiness and well-being.

So yes, I have actually a very liberal mindset when it comes to human sexuality.

I'm not precluding any type of consensual arrangement as long as it doesn't harm others.

And some affairs are consensual, for example in polyamory.

But when the affair involves concealment, lying, hiding, betrayal, to forgive this magnitude of deception and rejection, you need to be mentally impaired somehow.

Only people who are mentally unwell forgive deceptive affairs. Period.

There's no exception.

Forget all the nonsense and all the self-justification because people self-justify.

Forget all the mitigating circumstances.

There are none.

There is no mitigating circumstance to stabbing your loved one in the back, to betraying her, to lying to him, to concealing the most important part of your life from your togetherness.

There is no mitigating circumstance, no explanation, no justification.

Period.

Period.

If the marriage is of two psychologically impaired people, people with psychological problems, no number of affairs can fix this kind of union, this kind of marriage.

Affair is not a magic bullet. It is not a panacea. Affairs reflect the psychological dynamics of the two people involved in the couple, in the diet.

And if these dynamics are sick, dysfunctional, pathological, the affair would signify these underlying interactions between the couple, between the pathologies of the two members of the couple.

How affair can fix, revive, resuscitate a healthy relationship?

This is rank nonsense.

It flies in the face of all the evidence we have.

Affairs can resuscitate or revive or inject or spice up unhealthy, dysfunctional, pathological unions or diets or couples where the two members of the couple, or one of them at least, is mentally ill.

To accept an affair, to forgive it, to move on, to embrace it requires mental illness.

Again, period.

Period.

Not pleasant to hear, not palatable since many of you have committed adultery and infidelity.

And you don't want to hear that.

You want to justify yourself.

It was an aberration.

It was a one-off.

I didn't mean it.

It was a difficult period.

I felt misunderstood.

I didn't have enough sex.

I didn't have enough love.

And all other bullshit intended to justify the unjustifiable and excuse the inexcusable.

Serious mental illness is for life.

It is incurable, though it is manageable.

Ignore the self-interested nonsense online about healing.

The self-help industry is a scam if you didn't catch up to it by now.

So what do mentally healthy people, healthy, not impaired, not dysfunctional, not unhealthy, not ill, not disordered, healthy people, what do mentally healthy people do in the wake of an affair, in the aftermath of cheating and betrayal?

They break up.

Mentally healthy people break up after a deceptive affair.

End of story.

No other option, no other alternative unless you are mentally unwell.

If someone doesn't break up, doesn't separate, doesn't signify, doesn't walk away in the wake or the aftermath of an affair.

They are mentally impaired in some manner.

There is not a way about this.

The people who remain in a relationship where a deceptive, devious, backstabbing, lying affair has taken place.

These people are not mentally well.

Their boundaries are porous and non-existent.

They are dependent or co-dependent.

They regulate externally.

They clingy, they are needy.

They are parentified.

They are trauma bonded.

They are too anxious to face life and reality.

This is known as constriction.

They cannot perceive their partner as real.

They are dissociative.

I can continue the list.

Borderline, narcissism, I can continue the list.

100% of people who even contemplate or countenance the possibility of remaining in a bond where their intimate partner and significant other has rejected them, deceived them, lied to them, concealed from them, backstabbed them, bedmouthed them with another person.

If you consider to stay, even contemplate the possibility of staying in such a relationship, seek therapy.

Something is seriously wrong with you.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Interrogate Your Partner: Their Past is Your Future

When considering a potential intimate partner, it is essential to thoroughly understand their past, as it can significantly influence your future together. Full disclosure about personal and sexual history is crucial for making informed decisions, and withholding information should be seen as a red flag. People generally do not change fundamentally, so past behaviors are strong indicators of future actions, making it vital to ask detailed questions about their history. Ultimately, while you should not judge your partner for their past, you have the right to know the truth to protect yourself from potential negative outcomes in the relationship.


From Insecure to Flat Attachment: Narcissists, Psychopaths Never Bond (Compilation)

Attachment styles play a crucial role in shaping interpersonal relationships, with some individuals exhibiting what is termed "flat attachment," characterized by an inability to bond or relate to others. Flat attachers view people as interchangeable objects, moving seamlessly from one relationship to another without mourning the loss of previous connections. This detachment is often seen in narcissists and psychopaths, who lack the capacity for genuine intimacy and instead engage in superficial interactions. In contrast, individuals with secure or insecure attachment styles experience emotional complexities that influence their relationships, often leading to patterns of idealization and devaluation. Ultimately, understanding these dynamics is essential for navigating the challenges of intimacy and connection in human relationships.


Flat Attachment, Dreading Intimacy, and Defiant Promiscuity

Flat attachment is a type of attachment style where people are incapable of bonding or relatedness to others. They commodify people and treat them as replaceable objects. Flat attachment is common among narcissists and psychopaths. With the rise of dating apps and social pressures, people are becoming more atomized and isolated, leading to an increase in flat attachment.


No "Wrong" Partner, Other Moronic Relationship Advice

Self-help advice often misguides individuals regarding mate selection, suggesting that one can choose the "wrong" partner, when in fact, every partner chosen aligns with one's psychological makeup and attachment style. Mate selection is an evolutionary skill that reflects one's emotional needs, leading individuals to select partners that cater to their self-destructive tendencies or attachment styles. Additionally, the past behavior of a partner is a strong predictor of future actions, making it crucial to inquire about their history rather than dismissing it as irrelevant. Ultimately, understanding one's own psychological patterns and thoroughly vetting potential partners is essential for healthier relationships.


Hitchcock's Halloween Treat (or Trick?): Psycho, or Embodied Introject

The analysis of Norman Bates in "Psycho" reveals a complex interplay between his psychosis and his relationship with his mother, who serves as a powerful introject in his psyche. Norman's inability to separate his identity from his mother's oppressive influence leads to a distorted view of women, whom he ultimately seeks to control and eliminate as a means of asserting his autonomy. His actions, including the murder of Marion, are driven by a deep-seated guilt and a desire to reconcile his conflicting feelings of love and hatred towards his mother, culminating in a tragic cycle of self-destruction. The film illustrates the psychological ramifications of unresolved trauma and the destructive nature of narcissistic and psychopathic tendencies, as Norman embodies the very traits he despises in his mother.


Understanding Your Past and Future Relationships

Sam Vaknin discusses the importance of understanding the components of romantic relationships, including mate selection, relationship models, and termination triggers. He suggests that individuals should prioritize their expectations of relationships, including love, desire, stability, personal growth, and sexual compatibility. Additionally, he recommends identifying commitment triggers and predictors, building trust, and defining roles and responsibilities. By understanding these factors and establishing communication protocols with partners, individuals can increase the longevity of their relationships.


WARNING: Your Best Friend Will Poach Your Partner!

Mate poaching, or attempting to romantically attract someone who is already in a relationship, is a common seduction technique and mating strategy. Studies show that friendship is the best predictor of cheating, as it is the most common relationship invasion tactic. Friends with benefits can evolve into long-term romantic relationships, as friendship leads to investment and commitment. However, relationships formed from poaching tend to be of lower quality than non-poached counterparts, and individuals with a history of mate poaching often report poorer quality relationships.


ET to the Rescue: Narcissists and Psychopaths as Aliens - Part 1

Narcissists and psychopaths are often compared to aliens, as they lack empathy and a workable theory of mind. They view themselves as machines or robots and believe they are superior to most people. The video then discusses the possibility of extraterrestrial life and the six possible explanations for why we have not encountered aliens. The author also raises the question of how we can distinguish alien artifacts from naturally occurring objects and if we can recognize them as intelligent lifeforms if we have nothing in common with them.


Insecure Attachment Styles In Cluster B Personalities ( YOU, The Dead Mother)

Attachment styles and disorders significantly influence interpersonal relationships, particularly in individuals with personality disorders such as narcissism, psychopathy, and borderline traits. Early experiences with caregivers, especially those characterized by emotional unavailability or dysfunction, shape a child's internal working model, which persists into adulthood and affects their ability to form healthy attachments. The concept of the "dead mother" illustrates how children may internalize a painful attachment model, leading to a cycle of seeking out similar dysfunctional relationships in adulthood. Additionally, the introduction of a fifth attachment style, termed "flat attachment," highlights individuals who are incapable of forming meaningful bonds, further complicating the dynamics of attachment and emotional investment in relationships. Understanding these patterns is crucial for addressing the emotional and psychological challenges faced by individuals with complex trauma and attachment disorders.


Muddle Intimacy, Emotions, Attachment Style, Sex

Intimacy, emotions, sex, and attachment are often misunderstood and conflated, leading to confusion in relationships. Intimacy is defined by physical proximity, vulnerability, and joint activities, and does not inherently require emotions, while emotions can lead to intimacy but are not a prerequisite. Attachment styles, which are shaped by early experiences, should ideally inform mate selection, but many people fail to consider them, leading to repeated poor relationship choices. The distinctions between these concepts are crucial for understanding human connections and improving relational dynamics.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy