Background

Never Forgive Infidelity, Cheating!

Uploaded 9/8/2023, approx. 8 minute read

You want to feel vindicated, if you want to validate your ignorance, your biases, your prejudices, your inanity, and in some cases your inborn, inbred stupidity, there's a coach for that.

There's a public intellectual who would tell you everything you want to hear, who would tell you that you're right, that you're great, that you're an intellectual giant, that the rest of the world is wrong, science is wrong, authority is wrong, expertise is wrong, history is wrong, only you are right.

And these kinds of coaches and public intellectuals laugh all the way to the bank and they make very frequent trips to the bank.

Trust you me.

On the back of this mass gullibility, there are public intellectuals who claim that cheating in a marriage, extramarital affairs, strain, deception, lies, concealment, they're all good things, they're therapeutic, they revive the marriage, they imbue it with spice, they resuscitate it. They make it sound as if cheating were an altruistic act, an act of love and the affirmation of the marriage vows.

And of course, I'm not talking only about marriage, I'm talking about committed relationships in general.

Affairs are known as extra dyadic, extra dyadic sex. We are talking about having sex with someone outside the couple when there has been an agreement between the members of the couple to maintain sexual exclusivity culminating in some cases in monogamy.

Yesterday, I published the following short text on Instagram.

If having an affair has revitalized your marriage, then your union has always been sick and dysfunctional based on deception, mistrust and object dependency.

A mentally healthy marriage, a mentally healthy relationship never, never survives an affair.

And this provoked a storm.

And of course, people were bandying about all kinds of public intellectuals who claimed that there's nothing wrong with cheating.

Cheating can inject a lot of verve and energy into a more abundant and dying relationship.

And that cheating is nothing but a form of acting out, a dysfunctional way of coping with the difficulties of togetherness.


First of all, allow me to clarify what is it that I'm talking about.

I'm referring to cheating and I'm using the word cheating judiciously.

Cheating is an affair with another person outside the couple.

An affair which involves deception, by the way, it doesn't have to be sexual, it would be emotional.

It involves deception.

I am not referring to an open marriage or an open relationship or polyamory or the lifestyle, aka swinging or cacondry.

I'm not referring to any of these practices because they do not involve deception, concealment, backstabbing, betrayal.

These are consensual arrangements.

Any arrangement between consenting adults, which involves no coercion of any kind and no harm whatsoever to others is perfectly legitimate as a way to pursue happiness and well-being.

So yes, I have actually a very liberal mindset when it comes to human sexuality.

I'm not precluding any type of consensual arrangement as long as it doesn't harm others.

And some affairs are consensual, for example in polyamory.

But when the affair involves concealment, lying, hiding, betrayal, to forgive this magnitude of deception and rejection, you need to be mentally impaired somehow.

Only people who are mentally unwell forgive deceptive affairs. Period.

There's no exception.

Forget all the nonsense and all the self-justification because people self-justify.

Forget all the mitigating circumstances.

There are none.

There is no mitigating circumstance to stabbing your loved one in the back, to betraying her, to lying to him, to concealing the most important part of your life from your togetherness.

There is no mitigating circumstance, no explanation, no justification.

Period.

Period.

If the marriage is of two psychologically impaired people, people with psychological problems, no number of affairs can fix this kind of union, this kind of marriage.

Affair is not a magic bullet. It is not a panacea. Affairs reflect the psychological dynamics of the two people involved in the couple, in the diet.

And if these dynamics are sick, dysfunctional, pathological, the affair would signify these underlying interactions between the couple, between the pathologies of the two members of the couple.

How affair can fix, revive, resuscitate a healthy relationship?

This is rank nonsense.

It flies in the face of all the evidence we have.

Affairs can resuscitate or revive or inject or spice up unhealthy, dysfunctional, pathological unions or diets or couples where the two members of the couple, or one of them at least, is mentally ill.

To accept an affair, to forgive it, to move on, to embrace it requires mental illness.

Again, period.

Period.

Not pleasant to hear, not palatable since many of you have committed adultery and infidelity.

And you don't want to hear that.

You want to justify yourself.

It was an aberration.

It was a one-off.

I didn't mean it.

It was a difficult period.

I felt misunderstood.

I didn't have enough sex.

I didn't have enough love.

And all other bullshit intended to justify the unjustifiable and excuse the inexcusable.

Serious mental illness is for life.

It is incurable, though it is manageable.

Ignore the self-interested nonsense online about healing.

The self-help industry is a scam if you didn't catch up to it by now.

So what do mentally healthy people, healthy, not impaired, not dysfunctional, not unhealthy, not ill, not disordered, healthy people, what do mentally healthy people do in the wake of an affair, in the aftermath of cheating and betrayal?

They break up.

Mentally healthy people break up after a deceptive affair.

End of story.

No other option, no other alternative unless you are mentally unwell.

If someone doesn't break up, doesn't separate, doesn't signify, doesn't walk away in the wake or the aftermath of an affair.

They are mentally impaired in some manner.

There is not a way about this.

The people who remain in a relationship where a deceptive, devious, backstabbing, lying affair has taken place.

These people are not mentally well.

Their boundaries are porous and non-existent.

They are dependent or co-dependent.

They regulate externally.

They clingy, they are needy.

They are parentified.

They are trauma bonded.

They are too anxious to face life and reality.

This is known as constriction.

They cannot perceive their partner as real.

They are dissociative.

I can continue the list.

Borderline, narcissism, I can continue the list.

100% of people who even contemplate or countenance the possibility of remaining in a bond where their intimate partner and significant other has rejected them, deceived them, lied to them, concealed from them, backstabbed them, bedmouthed them with another person.

If you consider to stay, even contemplate the possibility of staying in such a relationship, seek therapy.

Something is seriously wrong with you.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Sexual Arousal? Only When Cheating on the Spouse

Some individuals find sexual pleasure exclusively through infidelity, as their formative experiences have linked intimacy with risk and deception. They thrive on the thrill of immorality, where the excitement of betrayal and the taboo enhances their arousal. This compulsive behavior often involves a roleplay dynamic, allowing them to dissociate from their actions and feel removed from their misconduct. Paradoxically, these cheaters maintain a strong attachment to their spouses, needing them as a source of emotional conflict and justification for their actions.


Promiscuity: Psychology of Self-Soothing with Sex (oh, and Relationships)

Promiscuity and cheating are increasingly common responses to neglect, abuse, and indifference in intimate relationships, often reflecting a broader societal trend where sex is reduced to a mechanical act devoid of emotional connection. This behavior is frequently linked to various mental health disorders, such as borderline personality disorder and narcissism, where individuals use promiscuity as a coping mechanism to regulate their self-worth and manage feelings of rejection or humiliation. The rise of online dating and the breakdown of traditional social mores have further exacerbated this issue, leading to a culture of reckless sexual behavior with little regard for the emotional or medical consequences. Ultimately, the lecture suggests that these trends are symptomatic of deeper psychological and societal dysfunctions, with little hope for a return to meaningful intimacy in relationships.


Borderline’s Partner: Enters Healthy, Exits Mentally Ill

Freud's theories on anaclitic object choice suggest that individuals seek partners who fulfill their emotional needs, with heterosexuality linked to maternal figures and homosexuality to self-similarity. However, these concepts are criticized as overly simplistic and incorrect, particularly regarding the nature of narcissism and the self. In relationships involving individuals with borderline personality disorder, a dynamic emerges where the borderline's need for constant external validation leads to their partners developing narcissistic traits as they internalize an idealized version of the borderline. This creates a cycle of approach and avoidance, resulting in both partners experiencing emotional instability and reinforcing each other's maladaptive behaviors.


Intimacy and Jealousy Regulate Relationships

In relationships, there are two ways to regulate behavior: intimacy and romantic jealousy. Healthy relationships achieve a balance between the two, but those with mood disorders or personality disorders cannot achieve intimacy and instead become fused together. To prevent abandonment, the partner may provoke romantic jealousy, but this can lead to the exact opposite effect and drive the other partner away. Finding the balance between intimacy and jealousy is difficult, and exaggerated regulatory behaviors can kill the relationship. The modern condition is that many people give up on relationships altogether.


No Intimacy Without Personal Boundaries (Q&A)

Intimacy skills are inextricably linked to the capacity to maintain and enforce personal boundaries. People with personality disorders don't have personal boundaries, which makes it impossible for them to do intimacy. Intimacy is a balancing act between separateness and togetherness, sharing commonalities and having a private life separate from the partner. The younger generations have tremendous deficiencies in relationship and intimacy skills because they don't have the chance to experience even intimacy in relationships.


Bondage Hijacked by Narcissists and Psychopaths (in the West) (ENGLISH responses)

Shibari, a form of Japanese rope art, emphasizes aesthetic values and the human body as a sculpture rather than dominance, contrasting sharply with Western bondage, which focuses on power dynamics. While some practices can cause physical harm, the primary intention of Shibari is artistic expression rather than violence. Narcissists often misinterpret these practices as extreme dominance, distorting the original intent and coupling it with real violence, leading to dangerous outcomes. Ultimately, true bondage is consensual and aims to please both partners, while narcissists engage in harmful acts that resemble hostage-taking rather than genuine bonding.


Casual Sex Q&A: The Fake Intimacy of Bodies

Romantic jealousy stems from abandonment or loss anxiety, and even casual sexual encounters can lead to deeper emotional attachments, making infidelity a legitimate concern for couples. The rise of hookup culture, facilitated by technology, has shifted perceptions of intimacy and sex, often reducing them to mechanical acts devoid of emotional connection, which can lead to negative mental health outcomes for certain individuals. Casual sex is often viewed differently by men and women, with men typically seeking physical availability while women may have more complex motivations, including emotional connection or social pressures. Ultimately, the prevalence of casual sex and the erosion of meaningful relationships reflect broader societal changes, where intimacy is increasingly seen as transient and superficial, leading to a disconnect between sexual and emotional fulfillment.


Fear of Intimacy Rationalized

People who fear intimacy have a phobia of exposing their vulnerabilities and committing to a long-term relationship. This fear is rooted in a deep distrust of the world and other people. They tend to devalue their intimate partner and imagine negative scenarios for the future. Fear of intimacy is a form of diffuse anxiety that causes people to withdraw and avoid intimate relationships. It is a cycle that can never be broken or interrupted, leading to a never-ending chase that never culminates in a happy ending.


Body Taboos and Water Sports (ENGLISH responses)

BDSM can serve as an anxiety-reducing mechanism for narcissists, providing temporary relief without long-term therapeutic benefits. The need for narcissists to escape their reality and explore different roles is fulfilled through BDSM, but it primarily alleviates anxiety rather than addressing deeper issues. The prohibition of certain bodily fluids, particularly urine, stems from modern societal norms rather than any biological or historical rationale, reflecting a constriction of sexual expression. This constriction, which began in the Victorian era, limits the exploration of natural bodily functions and pleasures, leading to a distorted view of healthy sexuality.


How We Select Mates in a Lonely World: Back to Nature

The processes of mate selection for casual sex and long-term relationships are fundamentally different, with modern mate selection increasingly resembling animalistic behaviors rather than being socially dictated. Historically, mate selection was influenced by societal norms and economic considerations, but contemporary practices emphasize emotional compatibility and individual preferences, often leading to casual encounters devoid of social scripts. As women gain financial independence and societal control diminishes, traditional pair bonding is eroding, resulting in increased promiscuity and a decline in parental investment. This shift may lead to a future where childlessness becomes normative, intimacy is minimized, and society transforms into a collection of isolated individuals rather than cohesive communities.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy