Understanding Your Past and Future Relationships

Uploaded 1/17/2014, approx. 9 minute read

My name is Sam Vaknin, and I am the author of Malignant Self-Love: Narcissism Revisited.

Women caught up in relationships with narcissists and psychopaths often ask themselves, what have I done wrong? What am I doing wrong? What should I have done differently? Why is this happening to me?

Well, to understand the answers to these questions, we need to discuss romantic relationships in general.

Romantic relationships with intimate partners, significant others, are comprised of three important components.

There is the issue of mate selection or mate choice. There is the issue of relationship model or hypotheses. There is the issue of termination triggers.

Mate selection, how you choose your partner, is critical, of course, but even more important is to ensure compatibility between the mate or the partner selected and the model of relationship one has in mind.

There are as many types of relationships as there are couples, and one would do well to define precisely how one would like to live her life with her spouse.

Consider an open marriage. Open marriage calls for one kind of partner, and then a traditional marriage calls for an entirely different sort of a person.

Mismatches between the personality, character, and temperament of the members of the couple and the relationship model that they have adopted, these mismatches are often the main fount of trouble, knowing the foundations and leading to the disintegration of the pair.

Yet even when one's mate, spouse, partner has been selected with care and perfectly fits the relationship one has in mind, some relationships still do crumble.

This is because the members of the couple have disparate, different termination triggers and abandonment anxiety thresholds.

We all have insecurities, fears, and co-dependence, and these often rise to the surface and lead to self-defeating behaviors, such as preemptive abandonment. I will walk away before he does this to me, before he abandons me.

Romantic, intimate relationships are comprised of various dimensions, functions, and axes. You should deconstruct, you should understand your past relationships in order to avoid mistakes in future ones.

So start by asking yourself, how do you perceive the role of relationships in your life? Is it something that fosters personal growth? Does it help you attain your life's goals?

Write down your personal narrative, and then ask yourself the following.

Which of the external and internal functions of relationships matter to you most in your romantic liaisons?

Use your answers to the following list to construct a prioritized list.

So I'm going to read now a list of external and internal functions of relationships, and you should consider which of these matters to you most, and then you should prioritize them.

The first thing we expect of a relationship is to experience love. There is this romantic love, infatuation, excitement, hearts, computations, and sweating, and so on, and there is mature love, as distinct from mere and fleeting infatuation. Which type of love matters to you most?

Second thing, do you wish to be desired, chosen, focus of attention and adulation? Do you insist on your relationship being monogamous and exclusive? Do you expect your relationships to provide you with excitement and thrill to counter boredom? Do you want your relationship to be stable, safe, predictable, and reliable to counter anxiety? Do you expect mirroring? Do you expect your partner to emphasize and share similarities with you? Do you expect your relationship to enhance your personal growth, as we have mentioned before?

What would you rather do in your relationship? Would you rather give or would you rather receive? Do you expect your relationship to enhance your social acceptability? In other words, to help you with conforming to society? Do you wish your relationships to confer social status on you? Do you expect your partner to be sexually available? How important is sex in your relationship? What can you do without?

Don't confuse sexual relations with intimacy. You can have either or, or both.

Do you want to have children? Do you expect your relationship to provide you with opportunities for procreation?

Are you looking for companionship, the unrestricted and immediate physical and mental availability of another person with whom one shares the same range of opinion, interests, and pursuits? Are you looking for a friend in your spouse or maid or partner, this deep or pervasive bonding to another person involving full, unmitigated trust, a great measure of non-sexual or also sexual intimacy, and the pursuit of the mutual well-being and happiness of both parties? Friendship.

Then, having prioritized this list, you should proceed to identify your commitment triggers.

What is it that determines whether a prospective partner, a person you've just met on a first date or a second date, what is it that determines whether this person you have met would end up being a one-night stand or your life-long spouse?

What makes you commit? Which triggers? And what are your relationship predictors?

In other words, you should commit to paper or screen. Everything that your inner voice tells you when it says, this may be the one, this may be Mr. Right, or when it guesstimates how long the relationship is likely to last.

These inner voices are critical, very important. You should listen to them. You should ask yourself, when do they come into play? When do they tell me that this may be the one?

You should list your expectations of yourself and of your partner and generate a coherent expectations profile. What am I looking for? Or what to look for? And what is he looking for?

You should determine how you test for reciprocity. What in your mind? How does it go in your mind? Is it a sort of quid pro quo type of ledger? Are you an accountant in your mind? Do you measure each and every give and take and balance them out in a sort of an accounting ledger? Or is it more diffuse, synoptic test, like generally you feel that your love is being reciprocated, your giving is being answered?

How do you build trust in the context of your relationships? Do you share information with your partner? Are you more into information discovery or not to put too fine a point on it, spying? Do you constantly gorge his reliability and responsibility? Is he on a constant test, in a constant test or exam? To what extent are you self-aware of your own good and bad qualities, forties, limitations, shortcomings?

Then there is of course the issue of sexual trajectory. What is the frequency of sex throughout the life of your typical past relationships? Are you sexually creative, imaginative, inventive? Do you initiate or merely respond to advances and cues? Are you initiating or the responsive type? Do you frequently end up finding yourself in sexless relationships? Are you mostly sexually available or are you withdrawn? To what extent do gender roles express themselves in your sex life with your intimate partner?

What about social, religious and cultural structures, strictures and biases? Do they hinder your sex life, enhance them?

To ask yourself with regards to your bus relationships, what is your relationship horizons? What are your expectations regarding the longevity of the relationship? And whether this expectation determines the relationship style.

When you believe the relationship is going to be short lived, do you choose the type of one style of relationship? Or do you treat all relationships as created equal and give all of them the same chance? Do you expect your relationships to last? Or are you always doubtful, pessimistic, cynical and fatalistic from the get-go?

Then there is a question of course of spatial proximity. Are you into cohabitation or otherwise sharing the same premises or area of life? Or would you rather live in separate departments and schedule your encounters? What role does territoriality play in describing the survival of your relationships?

Ask yourself about time as well. Temporal proximity. Do you need to do everything together with your partner? Which could amount to clinging and smothering? Or can you give him or her some space? Is it synchronous interactivity or time-delayed interaction that you seek? Do you immediately progress from casual acquaintance to full-fledged commitment? Or do you give it time and proceed incrementally and gradually and carefully?

There is a question also, of role allocation. Who decides on the allocation of roles and functions and duties in the couple? And how are these allocating? Do you typically talk over your roles, functions and responsibilities and reach an agreement explicitly? This is called explicit role allocation. Or do you let life dictate? Do you live it to life and play it by ear? It's role allocation by emergence. How specific are your roles?

Once the roles in your relationships have been defined, are they cast in stone? Are they rigid? Or are they subject to change as circumstances change and both of you grow and develop?

Essentially there are two types, two major models of relationships.

The type of relationship can be negotiated. Matchmaking, as simple as that.

So it's more of a business arrangement with some companionship thrown in.

The relationship can be emergent, can be romantic, love-based.

The type of partner. The partner could be a companion, a friend, and then you know, you seek out an active intellect, some charm, accomplishments, goal orientation, self-sufficiency. Or the partner can be a hypersexual, adventurer, or even a narcissist. Which of these two appeals to you?

The dynamics of your relationship. The relationship could be based on routines, full disclosure, common activities, hobbies, common growth goals. Or the relationship could be based on excitement, thrill, surprises.

The type of bond, the bond can be based on demonstrated exclusivity and perceived threat protocols where you communicate to your partner that you are feeling threatened, that you are hurt, that you feel insecure. Demonstrated exclusivity together with threat protocols, communication protocols. Or it could be an open relationship where both of you can do whatever you want, even in the sexual field.

There are then the territorial dimensions of the relationship.

There is a predefined relationship with predefined autonomy enclaves. These are areas of your life or even physical premises where you are autonomous, you have your privacy, and no one can barge in or ask you anything.

And there is another type of relationship where there is dependence and clinging and smothering and utter enmeshment of the two parties.

There is a type of relationship where there is spatial progression.

You start with separate apartments and you move in for a few days a week and then you end up cohabiting. So limited cohabitation with private spaces reserved in house or outside and then up to full cohabitation. Full cohabitation is the other part.

Then there is relationships with temporal progression.

You move incrementally and gradually and cautiously. And relationships which are immediate, full fledged.

So it's important to clearly define the model of relationship, to cohere with, to be compatible with the mates you select.

Once you've done that and once you've tackled your termination triggers by establishing communication protocols with your partner, the longevity of your relationship is virtually guaranteed

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

No "Wrong" Partner, Other Moronic Relationship Advice

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the concept of mate selection and attachment styles. He argues that individuals tend to select partners who resonate with their psychological makeup and attachment style, and that this is a result of an evolutionary process. Vaknin also emphasizes the importance of considering a partner's past behavior as the best predictor of future behavior, contrary to the advice given by some self-help gurus. He warns against blindly following online advice and encourages individuals to be thorough in understanding their potential intimate partners.

Secrets of Strong, Lasting Relationships

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the characteristics of strong and resilient relationships. He emphasizes the importance of shared vision, continued sexuality, and prioritizing the relationship above all else. He also explores the different types of successful marriages and the tasks that couples must perform to establish a strong and happy relationship. Vaknin draws on the work of Judith Wallerstein and highlights the significance of maintaining love, intimacy, and communication in relationships.

Abuse is Never Love! (With Zoë Verteramo, Indiana University Bloomington)

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the importance of love in relationships and the misconceptions surrounding it. He emphasizes that abuse and love are mutually exclusive and that healthy conflict is essential for growth in a relationship. Vaknin also criticizes the modern concept of love, attributing its corruption to societal influences such as dating apps and social media. He highlights the devaluation of intimacy and the commodification of individuals in the digital age.

12 Reasons to Divorce

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the complexities of divorce, including the historical dynamics of the couple, the rise of divorce as an exit strategy, and the impact of modern societal trends on relationships. He reviews 12 common reasons for divorce, such as communication issues, lack of love or intimacy, lack of partnership, and infidelity. Vaknin emphasizes the importance of redefining love and addressing issues such as addiction, domestic violence, and financial problems in relationships. He also highlights the impact of fatigue, lack of emotional support, and changes in self-identity as contributing factors to divorce.

Muddle Intimacy, Emotions, Attachment Style, Sex

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the confusion between intimacy, emotions, sex, and attachment. He argues that intimacy is not necessarily connected to emotions and that emotions, such as love, require intimacy. Attachment styles should match for relationships to work, and mate selection should be informed by attachment style. However, attachment style is not an integral part of mate selection. Flat attachment style is a type of attachment style where people are incapable of bonding or relatedness to others. Confusing these concepts has led to blurring lines and wrong conclusions in the field of gender studies and sexology.

Dr. Vaknin Experiments on Human Subjects (aka Students)

The professor discusses the concept of shared psychosis and how it is impossible to convince someone or a group that a hallucination is not real. He uses an example of two people feeling wet to explain that people cannot know if they experience things the same way. The professor concludes that people are not identical machines and that it is impossible to know if someone experiences things the same way as you do.

Push Narcissist’s 4 Secret Buttons: Gamma Man or Agent of Chaos, Madness?

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the four secret buttons of the narcissist, which are the operating system of the narcissist's internal landscape. He explains how to push these buttons to manipulate or detach from a narcissist. Additionally, he delves into the debate about IQ tests and their limitations, and discusses the concept of gamma males in the social sexual hierarchy. He also explores the discomfort and chaos that narcissists bring into relationships.

When Love Resembles Hate: Self-deception, Ambivalence, Dissonances

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the concept of love and hatred being two sides of the same coin, and how they can be interchangeable. He explains that both emotions lead to attachment and bonding, and that they can coexist in the same mind, leading to ambivalence. He also delves into how this ambivalence can manifest in mental health disorders and the various defense mechanisms people use to cope with it. Additionally, he explores the different types of dissonance that arise from experiencing love and hate simultaneously, and how it can lead to inaction and trauma-like responses.

Empathy As Narcissistic Psychotic Defense It's About YOU, Not The OTHER

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses a new theory of empathy, suggesting that when we empathize with someone, we are actually reacting to a totally internal object triggered by the other person. He argues that empathy is a form of intersubjectivity involving living things as objects, and that it is a learned response and a form of psychosis. Vaknin also explores the impact of positive emotions on empathy and its connection to the empathizer's internal state.

Opposites No Longer Attract How Narcissism Corrupts Mate Selection

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses mate selection and the impact of narcissism on modern relationships. He argues that people now seek partners who mirror their own traits and beliefs, rather than complementing them. This shift is attributed to the rise of narcissism, which has led to a decline in diversity and a focus on seeking validation and narcissistic supply from partners. Studies show that similarities, especially in political and religious beliefs, play a significant role in mate selection, and opposites no longer attract in long-term relationships. The professor also suggests that narcissism has degraded the mate selection process and poses an evolutionary threat to the human species.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy