Background

October 7: Anniversary of a Trauma (TalkTV with Trisha Goddard)

Uploaded 10/7/2024, approx. 8 minute read

Right at the beginning of the program, I said that something happening in a far-flung place, you're fooling yourself if you think, oh, it doesn't affect me here, I'm fine. It reverberates around the planet in many different ways. It could be amongst your colleagues or your friends or yourself or your, you know, in a thousand different ways.

Joining me now as somebody, as you watch or listen to this show, you know, is a very prized guest of mine and I always, I don't underestimate how lucky we are to have him contribute.

Sam Vaknin joins me now. Sam, as a psychologist with a brilliant world view, as someone who's, you know, as Jewish yourself, but I love the way that you look at the world through your eyes.

And I think I just touched upon, you know, and I've touched upon it throughout the program.

This whole thing about, that's just the news, it's got nothing to do with me. And forgetting it impacts very, very deeply for many people. And in all sorts of ways for the rest of us and I did that one of the things that I wanted to do throughout today show why I'm so glad that we've got you is to just alert people to that so they don't blunder into it.

Talk me through for let's start with Jewish people as well, you know, and the way people think they're just one lot of people who all believe the same thing. I mean, you know, and this is, you know, and the us and them thing.

But, you know, also it's the Jewish New Year as well. And there's a whole lot of feelings going on at the moment, isn't there?

Yes, Shanat Tovah, Rosh Hashanah, which means in Hebrew a happy new year.

The Jewish people is accustomed to ups and downs and persecution and exile and warfare. Jews have been warriors throughout the ages actually, well into the time of Jesus Christ. And then they've been exiled by the Romans and they became immigrants.

The first anti-immigrant movement in the world is anti-Semitism, because Jews have become immigrants in dozens of countries and territories and they have been rejected by the host or the would-be hosts.

And so they have learned to assimilate the outside point of view. And they reacted to it in a variety of ways.

They tried to assimilate. They tried to isolate themselves. They became avoidant. They tried to have a state of their own, normalize themselves. So they didn't become normal. They would be accepted. It's all about being accepted. The Jews yearn for acceptance.

And yet it keeps eluding them and so in Israel which is a fascinating experiment in its own right in Israel the population reacted, the Jewish population reacted in two ways denial and fantasy.

Denial means that the Israelis pretended, lied to themselves, that the occupation is something they can manage and handle, would not corrupt them, would not undermine the very foundations of the Jewish state as a just and democratic state.

So there's been a lot of denial going on there.

And another part of the nation engaged in fantasy, the fantasy that, you know, at the flick of a button, there could be peace and coexistence, and everyone would be smiling and happy and so on so forth, ignoring 140 years of strife, mutual massacres, and worse.

October 7th was a wake-up call for both sides of the equation, for the denialists and for the fantasies.

The fantasies have learned that there is an accumulation of rage, resentment on the Palestinian side. Much of it justified, I must say.

And the denials have learned the limitations of power as a tool for managing one's affairs and one's relationships and guaranteeing one's future.

What has been taken away from the Israeli nation on October 7th was a sense of safety. Now no one feels safe, not Palestinians, not Israelis, not Lebanese, not I think even Iranians.

And you're right that if anyone is deluding himself that this is a limited regional skirmish, then, you know, that's entirely untrue. This would easily spill over into horrendous scenarios, which, you know.

And so it's a trauma. It's a trauma to everyone involved.

And the thing is this, our predecessors have been exposed to news about traumatic events, but in a lifetime, you would have been exposed to two, three such news.

And today, since the age of television, we are inundated with traumatic and traumatizing images, inundated. We're easily exposed daily to hundreds of images and bits of information, which would have utterly destabilized and traumatized our ancestors, and that's daily.

So we reacted in one of two ways.

We become desensitized. There's compassion fatigue. We no longer care. We convert the whole thing into a kind of video game.

And the other type of reaction is we become activists and we try to make the world a better place.

And then we come across our own limitations and the very fact that power resides in the hands of the very few elites, oligarchs, politicians and so on so forth.

That's actually the simple folk, simple men and women. There's very little you can do and that in itself is traumatizing.


One of the things that Thahir Starma said, he wrote a piece in the Times and he made the point of there's a very real risk and I think it's probably already happened because we talked about discrimination in the workplace going up for Jewish and Muslim people, etc.

Is that people use whatever trauma is happening. They feel it's their time to shine, to be anti, to be, you know, finally I can hate in the open if I couch it in the right language and that brings anything happening anywhere in the world to our very doorsteps doesn't it because it can be our colleague the person up the, the person in the next town, who decides to enact, you know, I'm free to be hateful and you represent the people I want to be hateful towards.

What traumatic events, even far away traumatic events, the very exposure to traumatic images, traumatic imagery, traumatic sounds, traumatic traumatizing interviews and so on.

What trauma does, even vicariously, even by proxy, even remotely, what trauma does, it takes away your belief in the essential goodness of people, and it takes away your belief in the essential goodness of people and it takes away your belief that the world is a just structured and orderly place not a hostile and indifferent one.

So then you sit back and those are unconscious processes and you say well people are not essentially good, they're essentially evil. And the world is an unsafe place, unpredictable, capricious, arbitrary, dangerous, full of risks, lurking in the woods.

And so if you combine these two beliefs that people are malevolent, evil, conspiring, self-interested, narcissistic, perhaps, psychopathic maybe, and that the world is a place of peril and menace. If you combine these two, this triggers in you the survival instinct.

You want to fight back.


And so now the next question is, who is the enemy? You need to identify an enemy to restore your sense of safety, to restore some semblance of order and structure and justice into a universe that has been challenged by those traumatizing events.

So you seek, you seek, you are looking for an abuser, an enemy, a foe.

And then anyone would do. Anyone would do.

Your neighbor might become an enemy. A co-religionist might become an enemy. Anyone would do.

And then at that stage, you externalize aggression. You try to eliminate the perceived source of threat.

What I'm trying to say is that trauma triggers a chain reaction, which is highly predictable, has been described in literature time and again, is ineluctable.

In other words, there's no alternative. The chain reaction is one and only. And it leaves inexorably from exposure to trauma to traumatizing others.

What we do, we project the trauma. We have been traumatized, so we want to traumatize others.

By traumatizing others, we regain control and mastery over a life that seemed for a while to be random and terrified and so.

So hatred, envy and rage, they're ways of asserting or reasserting control over an environment that is perceived to be out of control.

It's a sad note to end on, but Sam, you know, I hope people listen, have listened to what you've said and recognize that within themselves because the one thing we do have some control about is what we do with our feelings and not as Sam so brilliantly said that we don't take our trauma and visit it upon somebody else instead of dealing it with it ourselves.

That's Sam Vaknin there, as I said very, I love having him on the show.

That's it for today.

Let me say a quick thank you to Ila Lonesse, Carla Batesis, Jack Thubbin, Faith Eden, Cammy Lamont Brown.

Because next up is Mark Sagan's the wonderful Saturday, Sunday night. I've got my days right with Mark Sagan's.

Mark, got to come a minute to tell me what's coming up.

I'm sorry I've eaten into the hand, David. But, you know, it's an conversation.

No, no, don't worry about that. Should any further things happen, of course, in the Middle East, we'll be bringing you the very latest news on all of the...

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

How Trauma Breaks You Apart (Structural Dissociation in Cold Therapy)

Dissociation can be understood as either a malfunction in integrating traumatic experiences or as a primitive defense mechanism in response to extreme trauma, particularly in children. The theory of structural dissociation posits that dissociation results from an integrative deficit, leading to the formation of distinct self-states, namely the apparently normal part (ANP) and the emotional part (EP), which interact in a conflictual manner. Trauma significantly impairs the ability to integrate experiences, resulting in symptoms that manifest as either psychoform or somatoform issues, and can lead to personality disorders being reconceptualized as disorders of integration rather than distinct personality conditions. The lecture emphasizes the importance of understanding the role of trauma in shaping these dissociative states and the need for therapeutic approaches that address the underlying trauma rather than merely the dissociative symptoms.


Triggering Cascade, Trauma Imprinting, and Total Reactance

The concept of a triggering cascade describes how minor triggers can unleash overwhelming trauma due to mental barriers that isolate painful memories. Narcissists and psychopaths exacerbate this by frustrating expectations and attacking deeply held beliefs, leading to extreme emotional reactions in those around them, including total reactance, where conflicts escalate disproportionately. Trauma can imprint on individuals and their environments, influencing their responses and potentially leading to either regression or personal growth, depending on how the trauma is processed. Ultimately, trauma is subjective and varies greatly among individuals, shaped by their backgrounds, personalities, and interactions with others.


Psychology of Political Assassinations, Aftermath: Messianic Saviors (TalkTV with Trisha Goddard)

Political assassins often exhibit traits of isolation and dichotomous thinking, viewing the world in terms of good versus evil, which is rooted in narcissism. Their motivations are highly personalized, leading them to mythologize both themselves and their targets, believing they are on a mission to cleanse the world. The aftermath of an assassination attempt can significantly shape public perception, with survivors often portrayed as victims or martyrs, while successful assassinations can lead to the target being canonized in public memory. Political violence stifles honest discourse and can inadvertently benefit those who are willing to disregard ethical constraints, potentially giving an advantage to more extreme factions.


Spree Shooter's Psychology

Spray-shooters typically exhibit severe interpersonal dysfunction, often stemming from early childhood trauma, leading to feelings of exclusion and inadequacy. Their pent-up aggression manifests as uncontrollable rage, often directed at marginalized groups, which they scapegoat to justify their violent actions. During the act of violence, they experience a temporary sense of belonging and relief from anxiety, while their subsequent suicide is a defiant gesture that reinforces their self-perception as failures. Life crises often trigger these violent outbursts, marking a descent into despair before their ultimate demise.


Why do We Hate (Talk TV with Trisha Goddard)

Hate often arises from a sense of negative identity, where individuals define themselves in opposition to others, leading to aggression towards those who resemble them closely rather than those who are different. This phenomenon is exacerbated by feelings of envy and the perception of threats to one's uniqueness and privileges, particularly when others seek to adopt similar values or rights. Politicians exploit this dynamic by framing certain groups as victims or threats, which can intensify societal divisions and resentment. To counteract hate, fostering empathy through education and reframing competitors as opportunities rather than threats is essential for promoting understanding and reducing conflict.


Invisible Class War, Traumatized Communities (TalkTV with Trisha Goddard)

Ignoring the grievances of marginalized groups can lead to their radicalization and alignment with extremist movements, as seen historically with figures like Hitler and contemporary leaders like Trump. The "invisible class," comprising disillusioned youth, working-class individuals, and less educated people, feels overlooked and is driven by a sense of loss and exclusion, which can be exploited by elites seeking to maintain power. This dynamic creates a cycle where the invisible class's frustrations are co-opted by demagogues, who promise change but ultimately disregard their needs once in power. The resulting societal violence not only disrupts community cohesion but also inflicts trauma on a national level, necessitating a comprehensive approach to healing and addressing underlying issues.


Post-traumatic Growth (PTG) or Positive Disintegration?

Psychology is often criticized for lacking rigor and scientific methodology, contributing to the replication crisis where many studies cannot be replicated. Trauma is defined as a profound conflict between reality and personal beliefs or models, leading to a breakdown of understanding and identity, while post-traumatic growth is deemed an oxymoron because trauma does not foster growth but rather regression and dysfunction. The confusion between trauma and life crises is highlighted, as the latter can lead to positive adaptations and personal development, whereas trauma is characterized by its unexpected and surreal nature, hindering growth. The concept of positive disintegration, proposed by Kazimierz Dabrowski, suggests that stress and anxiety can lead to personal growth, but this process is distinct from trauma, which ultimately stunts development and creates maladaptive changes.


Dead Parents Clone Narcissists (and Codependents And Borderlines)

There are three types of trauma: self-inflicted, reality-inflicted, and parental-inflicted, with parental trauma being particularly detrimental to personal development. Reality-inflicted traumas can lead to growth by challenging one's beliefs and self-image, while self-inflicted traumas often arise from introspection and can also promote personal growth. In contrast, parental trauma, especially from a "dead mother," can result in dysfunction and hinder emotional regulation, leading to various psychological issues. The development of a healthy self involves recognizing boundaries and creating a narrative that distinguishes between internal and external objects, ultimately fostering empathy and a sense of safety in the world.


Silencing Denying Your Pain Betrayal Trauma And Betrayal Blindness

The lecture discusses Betrayal Trauma Theory, emphasizing that trauma can be exacerbated when the perpetrator is someone the victim relies on for survival, leading to denial and dissociation as coping mechanisms. It critiques societal norms that discourage emotional expression, arguing that acknowledging pain is a sign of strength rather than weakness. The theory highlights the importance of recognizing betrayal in relationships, particularly in childhood, and how it can lead to various psychological disorders, including PTSD and dissociative identity disorder. Ultimately, the lecture advocates for a deeper understanding of betrayal trauma to improve therapeutic approaches and support for victims.


False “Recovered” Memories or Real Abuse? (University Lecture)

The lecture discusses the complexities of memory, particularly focusing on false memories and their formation, especially in the context of trauma and therapy. It highlights how suggestibility, confabulation, and gaslighting can lead individuals to create vivid but inaccurate memories, often influenced by therapists or social pressures. The distinction between core memories of trauma, which are immutable, and peripheral memories, which can be altered, is emphasized, along with the potential dangers of recovered memory therapy that can exacerbate mental health issues. The speaker warns against the unethical practices of some therapists who may encourage clients to fabricate or exaggerate their experiences, ultimately harming their psychological well-being.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy