Background

Psychology of Swinging (The Lifestyle)

Uploaded 11/15/2013, approx. 4 minute read

My name is Sam Vaknin and I am the author of Malignant Self-Love, Narcissism Revisited.

The lifestyle involves sexual acts performed by more than two participants, whether in the same space or separately. The lifestyle is also known as swinging, wife or spouse-sharing or swapping, group sex, and where multiple people interact with a single person, gang banging.

Swinging can be soft, engaging in sexual activity with one's own intimate partner but in the presence of others, or hard, having sex not with one's spouse or mate.

The psychological background to such unusual pursuits is not clear and has never been studied or established in depth. Still, thousands of online chats between active and wannabe adherents in various forums reveal ten psychodynamic strengths.

One, latent and overt bisexuality and homosexuality. Both men and women adopt swinging as a way to sample same-sex experiences in a tolerant, Italian's anonymous and permissive environment.

Then there is the Slut-Madona complex. To be sexually attracted to their spouses, some men need to debase and humiliate them by witnessing their sluttish conduct with others. These men find it difficult to have regular intimate sex with women to whom they are emotionally attached and whose property is beyond doubt. Sex is dirty in their minds, it is demeaning and should be mechanical, the preserve of boorish and promiscuous partners.

Voyeurism and exhibitionism are both rampant and satisfied by swinging. Oftentimes, those who partake in the lifestyle document their exploits of video and share photos and saucy verbal descriptions with each other. Amateur porn and public sex, known as dogging, are fixtures of swinging.

Then there is the issue of vicarious gratification.

Cuckolds are typically male swingers who must masturbate to the sight of their partner having sex with another, usually without actually joining the fray. They derive gratification from and are sexually aroused by the evident pleasure experienced by their significant other with another person. Her vocalizations, body language, body fluids, enraptured movements, orgasm and abandon.

Masochism is a prime motive for a minority of singers. They relish in their own agony as they watch their spouse hooking up with others. Feelings of envy, pain, anxiety, a sense of humiliation, an overpowering feeling of worthlessness and inadequacy, sinfulness, debauchery, depravity and decadence all conspire to thrill the masochist and delight him.

Swinging is also a form of legitimized cheating. It spices up the stale sex lives of the players and neutralizes the emotional and financial risks and threats associated with flirty extramarital escapades.

Many swingers adopt the lifestyle in order to alleviate boredom, counter routine, feel desirable and attractive again, learn new techniques and cope with discrepancies in sex life.

They insist, swinging saved my marriage.

Some swingers use the lifestyle to display or exhibit their partners, casting them as desired and desirable trophies or status symbols. Others present may sexually sample my wife but never own her, says the swinger.

It's a form of restricted access, which causes her suitors much envy and frustration. I am the one who ends up going home with her, these swingers brag, thus reaffirming their own irresistibility and attractiveness.

The lifestyle is a rollercoaster of serial relationships mostly with strangers. It is therefore thrilling, risky and exciting and provokes anxiety, romantic jealousy and guilt for having dragged the partner into the lifestyle or for not having restrained her in time.

There is also a recurrent fear of losing the partner owing to a growing emotional or sexual bonds with one of her casual f-buddies or friends with benefits.

Swinging results in an adrenaline rush, a high, and in addictive periods of calm after these self-inflicted psychosexual storms.

Swinging calls for the objectification of the sexual partner.

Many swingers prefer to remain anonymous in settings like lifestyle retreats or group sex and orgies.

They are thus reduced to genitalia and erogenous zones enmeshed in autoerotic and narcissistic acts of masturbatory gratification, using other people's bodies as mere props.

Other practitioners of swinging actually prefer to swing only with close friends, using sex as a form of intimacy-enhancing recreation.

Finally, nudity has a pronounced aesthetic dimension.

When multiple naked bodies intertwine, the combination can amount to a work of art, a flesh and blood-throwing sculpture.

Many swingers find sex to be the most supreme form of artistic experience, an interconnectedness that enhances empathy and communication and provides extreme central pleasure.

It is also great fun, the ultimate in entertainment, where novelty and familiarity merge to yield a unique journey with each new entrance and new experience.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Meaningful Casual Sex, One Night Stands: Their Emotions and Psychology

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the psychology of casual sex and one-night stands, arguing that they are not meaningless or emotionless experiences. He explains that casual sex involves a spectrum of activities and is a continuum, with one-night stands being a part of it. Vaknin highlights that casual sex and one-night stands involve trust, safety, suspension of defenses, and exposure of vulnerabilities, which are all elements of intimacy. Despite people's claims that these encounters are emotionless and meaningless, Vaknin argues that the emotional reactions and physiological changes that occur during and after casual sex prove otherwise.


Do Men Prefer Blondes or Brunettes? (See PINNED COMMENT)

Men tend to prefer blondes for casual encounters and one-night stands, while they favor brunettes for long-term relationships and partnerships. This preference is influenced by stereotypes that portray blondes as less threatening, more available, and childlike, which enhances male self-confidence and attraction. Blondes are also perceived as rarer and healthier, contributing to their allure, while the perception of them as promiscuous and untrustworthy diminishes their desirability for serious commitments. Ultimately, cultural influences and evolutionary factors play significant roles in shaping these preferences.


PCL-R (Psychopathy Checklist Revised) Test

The Psychopathy Checklist Revised Test (PCLR) is a structured interview that is used to rate symptoms common among psychopaths in forensic populations. The test is designed to cover the major psychopathic traits and behaviors, but it has very dubious, predictive and retrodictive power. The PCLR is based on a structured interview and collateral data gathered from family, friends, and colleagues and from documents. The hope of the designers of the PCLR test is that information gathered outside the scope of a structured interview will serve to rectify any potential abuse, diagnostic bias, and manipulation by both the testee and the tester.


Personality or Gut Disorders? Microbiome and Mental Illness

The gut microbiome plays a crucial role in mental health, influencing not only brain function but also personality and temperament through a bidirectional relationship. This relationship suggests that gut bacteria can affect emotional states and behaviors, while psychological conditions can alter gut microbiota composition. Research indicates that disturbances in gut bacteria are linked to various psychiatric disorders, including borderline personality disorder, and that early life factors, such as maternal gut health, can impact the development of these conditions. The interconnectedness of bodily systems challenges traditional views of mental health, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach to treatment that considers the gut-brain axis. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of gut health in understanding and potentially treating mental health issues.


Myths of One Night Stands and Casual Sex (Full Text in DESCRIPTION)

Casual sex elicits mixed reactions, with some finding it exciting while others view it negatively, and studies show that men and women respond similarly to it. Negative mental health outcomes are linked to casual sex primarily in individuals with certain backgrounds, such as those influenced by conservative values or who experience emotional attachment after encounters. The normalization of casual sex raises concerns about its impact on the ability to form meaningful relationships in the future, particularly among younger generations who may view sex as a mere physical act. Ultimately, the issue lies not in casual sex itself, but in its prevalence and the implications it has for emotional intimacy and relationship dynamics.


Toxic Sex: When "Love" Is Bad For You

Sex can be bad for mental health, just like cigarettes. Some forms of sex, such as those intended to regulate emotions or moods, or those without meaningful informed consent, are toxic and should be avoided. Sex used as a form of self-mutilation or self-harm, or as a way to self-objectify, is also bad for mental health. Non-autonomous sex, where sex is used to make a partner like or love you, is possibly the sickest form of sex. The psychosexuality of those who engage in bad, toxic, and wrong sex is part psychopathic and part people-pleasing.


MMPI-2 Psychological Test: Controversial, but Hard to Fake

The MMPI-2 test booklet has 567 items, but a rough assessment can be made based on the first 370 queries. The items are arranged in scales, and the responses are compared to answers provided by control subjects. The nature of the deviation determines the patient's traits and tendencies, but not their diagnosis. The test results place the subject in a group of patients who reacted similarly, and the validity scales indicate whether the patient responded truthfully and accurately or was trying to manipulate the test. The clinical scales measure various mental health issues, and the interpretation of the MMPI-2 is now fully computerized.


Psychological Tests and Structured Interviews: Introduction

Personality assessment combines both art and science, with standardized psychological tests and structured interviews designed to minimize bias and ensure objectivity. These tests often limit responses to specific formats, such as true or false, and rely on automated scoring to reduce human involvement in data gathering. However, interpretation remains crucial, and practitioners typically use multiple tests to create a coherent picture of an individual's personality, ensuring that results align across different assessments. The distinction between objective and projective tests highlights the varying levels of structure and potential bias in scoring, with projective tests relying heavily on the clinician's judgment and interpretation.


Casual Sex Q&A: The Fake Intimacy of Bodies

Romantic jealousy stems from abandonment or loss anxiety, and even casual sexual encounters can lead to deeper emotional attachments, making infidelity a legitimate concern for couples. The rise of hookup culture, facilitated by technology, has shifted perceptions of intimacy and sex, often reducing them to mechanical acts devoid of emotional connection, which can lead to negative mental health outcomes for certain individuals. Casual sex is often viewed differently by men and women, with men typically seeking physical availability while women may have more complex motivations, including emotional connection or social pressures. Ultimately, the prevalence of casual sex and the erosion of meaningful relationships reflect broader societal changes, where intimacy is increasingly seen as transient and superficial, leading to a disconnect between sexual and emotional fulfillment.


Tinder Myths Debunked: Online Dating Revisited

Tinder and other dating apps are primarily used for entertainment and self-esteem boosting rather than for casual sex, with a significant majority of users seeking long-term romantic relationships. The misconception that Tinder is predominantly a hookup app is contradicted by research showing that most interactions remain online and rarely lead to real-life meetings or sexual encounters. Studies indicate that women prefer empathetic and kind partners, often referred to as "beta males" in the Manosphere, while the so-called "alpha males" are typically narcissistic and psychopathic, traits that women find unattractive. Overall, dating apps serve as a filtering mechanism in the modern dating landscape, facilitating connections that often lead to committed relationships despite the initial intentions of users.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy