Background

Søren Kierkegaard on Self, Love, and Self-love (Text in Description)

Uploaded 10/8/2020, approx. 5 minute read

I want to read to you something written by Soren Kierkegaard, the Danish religious philosopher.

Danish philosopher Kierkegaard is the founder of modern existentialism.

He wrote a lot about Christianity, morality, ethics, religion, and one of his books is called The Works of Love, a wonderful book.

In the book he says that Jesus said, you shall love your neighbor as yourself.

And then Kierkegaard asked himself, Jesus said you should love your neighbor as you love yourself.

Is Jesus commanding us to love ourselves?

If you don't love yourself, you can't love your neighbor according to Jesus.

So you must love yourself.

And indeed, in the Roman Catholic tradition, you can't love God truly if you don't love yourself.

In the Protestant tradition, self-love became narcissism in the Protestant tradition.

The Protestants are saying that if you self-love, you can't really love others.

You can't love your neighbors. You can't love your colleagues. You can't love your family. You can't love God.

Self-love is a barrier. It's a firewall.

It's a defense against loving others, against what we call object relations.

In Catholicism, and with Kierkegaard, it's not the case, he believes you must self-love. You must love yourself. It's a dictum by God and Jesus, and without this, you can't love anyone else.

Kierkegaard admits that you need to love yourself very subtly.

There is a type of self-love that is deeply unhealthy, destroys humanity, and there is proper self-love.

Proper self-love makes us whole, makes us complete persons.

So according to Kierkegaard, what Jesus said is not that you should first love yourself and then love your neighbor, but you should realize that love for your neighbor and love for yourself are the same thing.

There is no self apart from others.

Relationships constitute the self, or in Jung's language, relationships constellate the self.

Kierkegaard doesn't call it love, he calls it forgiveness.

He says only when you forgive your neighbor, you truly forgive yourself, but you must forgive.

Here is a quote from his book. When it is said you should love your neighbor as yourself, therein is contained what is presupposed, that every man loves himself.

Is it possible for anyone to misunderstand this? As if it were the intention of Christianity to proclaim self-love as a prescriptive right?

On the contrary, it is its purpose to wrest self-love away from us human beings.

This implies loving one's self, but if one must love his neighbor as himself, then the command, like a pick, wrenches open the lock of self-love and thereby rests it away from a man.

This as yourself does not waver in its aim and with the firmness of the eternal it critically penetrates.

It reaches the innermost hiding place where a man loves himself.

It does not leave self-love the slightest excuse or the tiniest escape hatch.

As Jacob limped after having struggled with God, so shall self-love be broken if it has struggled with this phrase, which nevertheless does not seek to teach a man not to love himself, but in fact rather seeks to teach him proper self-love. Therefore - as yourself.

Suppose the most cunning deceiver who is ever in order, if possible, to have the opportunity of using many words and becoming loquacious (for then the deceiver would quickly conquer), were tempting to question the royal law year in and year out, "how shall I love my neighbor?"

Then the terse command, unchanged, will continue to repeat the short phrase, "as yourself."

And if any deceiver has deceived himself throughout his whole life by all sorts of verbosity concerning this subject, the eternal will only hold him to the terse word of the law, as yourself.

No one, to be sure, will be able to escape this command.

If it's as yourself comes as close to the life of self-love as is possible, then one's neighbor is again a qualification as fatally close to self-love as possible.

Self-love itself perceives that it is an impossibility to shirk this.

The only escape is the one which the Pharisees in their time also tried in order to justify themselves: to let it be doubtful who one's neighbor is - in order to get him out of one's life.

Self-love, says Kierkegaard, is loving another.

The self is the totality of our interconnected mesh with other people. That's our self, he says.

If we love ourselves, by definition we love the self which is all our human contacts and by extension all of humanity.

He denies actually the possibility of an individual.

He says that to have a self is to immerse yourself in the totality of the human experience and with all other people, with all other human beings.

If you think that you can survive and live and love yourself without the aid and the support and the involvement and the penetration of other people, you are what he calls a deceiver.

Truer words have never been spoken, ask any narcissist.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Four Pillars of Self-love

Self-love is about having a realistic view of oneself and pursuing happiness and favorable outcomes. It is essential for living a proper life and being capable of loving and being loved. The four conditions for healthy self-love are self-awareness, self-acceptance, self-trust, and self-efficacy. These conditions are necessary for survival and guide individuals to make rational, realistic, and beneficial decisions. Experience alone is not enough without self-love, as self-love serves as a reliable compass in life.


Why Do We Stay in Abusive Relationships? The Sunk Cost Fallacy or Bias

The sunk-cost bias or sunk-cost fallacy or the concord fallacy is the tendency to remain in bad relationships, even if they are abusive, sexless, loveless, or doomed. This bias is motivated by malignant optimism, an over-estimation of the probabilities of positive outcomes if we just keep going or keep doing something differently. It is a particularly pernicious brand of loss aversion, the proclivity to avoid waste. The rational thing to do is to cut your losses and abandon the dysfunctional relationship, but surprisingly few people do so in time, resulting in wrecked marriages, hateful exes, bruised children, and crumbling enterprises.


Dangerous Shared Fantasies: Coercive Control and Collusive Infidelity

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses shared fantasy, object constancy, mortification, enabling in codependency, toxic masculinity, and coercive control. Coercive control is a pattern of controlling behaviors that create an unequal power dynamic in a relationship, resulting in physical violence. Projective identification and collusive infidelity are also discussed. Vaknin suggests that a state legislature could create a new offense based upon the fraud-like nature of coercively controlling behavior.


Silencing Denying Your Pain Betrayal Trauma And Betrayal Blindness

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses betrayal trauma theory, which suggests that trauma is perpetrated by someone close to the victim and on whom they rely for support and survival. Betrayal trauma can lead to dissociation, attachment injury, vulnerability, fear, relationship expectations, shame, low self-esteem, communication issues, and barriers to forming new relationships. The section also explores the relationship between betrayal trauma and Stockholm syndrome, with the former being more common. Treatment for betrayal trauma is new, and relational cultural therapy may be the best approach. The section concludes with the idea that trust is essential in relationships.


How Can I Trust Again?

Trust is an essential component of love and an important test of it. Mistrust or distrust are induced by life's circumstances, and to continue to not trust is to reward the people who had wronged us and rendered us distrustful in the first place. Trust must be put to the test lest it go stale and stale. Whatever the act of betrayal, it has limited hint, and putting a bridge of trust in perspective goes a long way towards the commencement or healing process.


“Twin Flames” and Their “Empaths”: Danse Macabre

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the dangerous dynamics of the "twin flame" relationship, warning that those who believe they have found their twin flame are likely being manipulated by a narcissist or psychopath. He explains how the twin flame idealizes and controls the individual, leading to a state of merger and fusion that compromises personal autonomy. Vaknin also criticizes the self-aggrandizing label of "empath," cautioning against falling into a pattern of grandiosity and dependency. He emphasizes the detrimental effects of allowing the twin flame to control one's emotions and thoughts, leading to isolation and paranoia.


From Grooming to Discard via Shared Fantasy: Cheat, Mortify, Exit

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the cycle of relationships with a narcissist, which follows a pattern of five phases: grooming, shared fantasy, interstitial one with two options, mortification or anti-fantasy, and interstitial two. The narcissist creates a shared fantasy to extract sex, supply, and services from their partner, and the shared fantasy allows them to avoid true intimacy and commitment. Cheating is an option for women who want to escape the shared fantasy and create an alternative sanctuary with another man. The fourth phase, the anti-fantasy phase, occurs when the partner tries to transition from the shared fantasy to reality, and the narcissist becomes indecisive and approach avoidant. Mortification is crucial to end the shared fantasy, and the narcissist switches to internal or external mortification


Get Parasite Narcissist Out of Your Colonized Mind

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the concept of shared fantasy as a form of paracosm, an alternative reality constructed by narcissists to manipulate and control their intimate partners. He delves into the intricate mechanisms of how narcissists hijack the minds of their victims through processes such as entraining and dissociation. Vaknin emphasizes the importance of memory recovery and the distinction between authentic emotions and those implanted by the abuser. He also explores the role of trauma and dissociation in perpetuating the effects of abuse.


Two Faces Of Narcissistic Abuse Disrespect From Shared Fantasy To Bargaining

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the dynamics of narcissistic abuse, including the two phases of the shared fantasy and bargaining phase. He explains how narcissists use stickiness to create a shared fantasy with their targets and then extract adulation, abuse, sex, and services. Vaknin also highlights the differences between narcissists and psychopaths and concludes that narcissistic abuse is a choice and a stupid one at that.


From Insight to Self-love, Self-care: 4 Conditions, 4 Steps

Personal change requires self-awareness, empathy, motivation, and emotions. Self-awareness involves understanding oneself without pretension. Empathy is crucial for fitting into society and motivating change. Motivation to change is influenced by interactions with others and the environment. Emotions, including love and negative feelings, drive personal growth. Self-love is based on self-awareness, self-acceptance, self-trust, and self-efficacy, and serves as a reliable compass in life.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy