Background

Understanding Your Past and Future Relationships

Uploaded 1/17/2014, approx. 9 minute read

My name is Sam Vaknin, and I am the author of Malignant Self-Love: Narcissism Revisited.

Women caught up in relationships with narcissists and psychopaths often ask themselves, what have I done wrong? What am I doing wrong? What should I have done differently? Why is this happening to me?

Well, to understand the answers to these questions, we need to discuss romantic relationships in general.

Romantic relationships with intimate partners, significant others, are comprised of three important components.

There is the issue of mate selection or mate choice. There is the issue of relationship model or hypotheses. There is the issue of termination triggers.

Mate selection, how you choose your partner, is critical, of course, but even more important is to ensure compatibility between the mate or the partner selected and the model of relationship one has in mind.

There are as many types of relationships as there are couples, and one would do well to define precisely how one would like to live her life with her spouse.

Consider an open marriage. Open marriage calls for one kind of partner, and then a traditional marriage calls for an entirely different sort of a person.

Mismatches between the personality, character, and temperament of the members of the couple and the relationship model that they have adopted, these mismatches are often the main fount of trouble, knowing the foundations and leading to the disintegration of the pair.

Yet even when one's mate, spouse, partner has been selected with care and perfectly fits the relationship one has in mind, some relationships still do crumble.

This is because the members of the couple have disparate, different termination triggers and abandonment anxiety thresholds.

We all have insecurities, fears, and co-dependence, and these often rise to the surface and lead to self-defeating behaviors, such as preemptive abandonment. I will walk away before he does this to me, before he abandons me.

Romantic, intimate relationships are comprised of various dimensions, functions, and axes. You should deconstruct, you should understand your past relationships in order to avoid mistakes in future ones.

So start by asking yourself, how do you perceive the role of relationships in your life? Is it something that fosters personal growth? Does it help you attain your life's goals?

Write down your personal narrative, and then ask yourself the following.

Which of the external and internal functions of relationships matter to you most in your romantic liaisons?

Use your answers to the following list to construct a prioritized list.

So I'm going to read now a list of external and internal functions of relationships, and you should consider which of these matters to you most, and then you should prioritize them.

The first thing we expect of a relationship is to experience love. There is this romantic love, infatuation, excitement, hearts, computations, and sweating, and so on, and there is mature love, as distinct from mere and fleeting infatuation. Which type of love matters to you most?

Second thing, do you wish to be desired, chosen, focus of attention and adulation? Do you insist on your relationship being monogamous and exclusive? Do you expect your relationships to provide you with excitement and thrill to counter boredom? Do you want your relationship to be stable, safe, predictable, and reliable to counter anxiety? Do you expect mirroring? Do you expect your partner to emphasize and share similarities with you? Do you expect your relationship to enhance your personal growth, as we have mentioned before?

What would you rather do in your relationship? Would you rather give or would you rather receive? Do you expect your relationship to enhance your social acceptability? In other words, to help you with conforming to society? Do you wish your relationships to confer social status on you? Do you expect your partner to be sexually available? How important is sex in your relationship? What can you do without?

Don't confuse sexual relations with intimacy. You can have either or, or both.

Do you want to have children? Do you expect your relationship to provide you with opportunities for procreation?

Are you looking for companionship, the unrestricted and immediate physical and mental availability of another person with whom one shares the same range of opinion, interests, and pursuits? Are you looking for a friend in your spouse or maid or partner, this deep or pervasive bonding to another person involving full, unmitigated trust, a great measure of non-sexual or also sexual intimacy, and the pursuit of the mutual well-being and happiness of both parties? Friendship.

Then, having prioritized this list, you should proceed to identify your commitment triggers.

What is it that determines whether a prospective partner, a person you've just met on a first date or a second date, what is it that determines whether this person you have met would end up being a one-night stand or your life-long spouse?

What makes you commit? Which triggers? And what are your relationship predictors?

In other words, you should commit to paper or screen. Everything that your inner voice tells you when it says, this may be the one, this may be Mr. Right, or when it guesstimates how long the relationship is likely to last.

These inner voices are critical, very important. You should listen to them. You should ask yourself, when do they come into play? When do they tell me that this may be the one?

You should list your expectations of yourself and of your partner and generate a coherent expectations profile. What am I looking for? Or what to look for? And what is he looking for?

You should determine how you test for reciprocity. What in your mind? How does it go in your mind? Is it a sort of quid pro quo type of ledger? Are you an accountant in your mind? Do you measure each and every give and take and balance them out in a sort of an accounting ledger? Or is it more diffuse, synoptic test, like generally you feel that your love is being reciprocated, your giving is being answered?

How do you build trust in the context of your relationships? Do you share information with your partner? Are you more into information discovery or not to put too fine a point on it, spying? Do you constantly gorge his reliability and responsibility? Is he on a constant test, in a constant test or exam? To what extent are you self-aware of your own good and bad qualities, forties, limitations, shortcomings?

Then there is of course the issue of sexual trajectory. What is the frequency of sex throughout the life of your typical past relationships? Are you sexually creative, imaginative, inventive? Do you initiate or merely respond to advances and cues? Are you initiating or the responsive type? Do you frequently end up finding yourself in sexless relationships? Are you mostly sexually available or are you withdrawn? To what extent do gender roles express themselves in your sex life with your intimate partner?

What about social, religious and cultural structures, strictures and biases? Do they hinder your sex life, enhance them?

To ask yourself with regards to your bus relationships, what is your relationship horizons? What are your expectations regarding the longevity of the relationship? And whether this expectation determines the relationship style.

When you believe the relationship is going to be short lived, do you choose the type of one style of relationship? Or do you treat all relationships as created equal and give all of them the same chance? Do you expect your relationships to last? Or are you always doubtful, pessimistic, cynical and fatalistic from the get-go?

Then there is a question of course of spatial proximity. Are you into cohabitation or otherwise sharing the same premises or area of life? Or would you rather live in separate departments and schedule your encounters? What role does territoriality play in describing the survival of your relationships?

Ask yourself about time as well. Temporal proximity. Do you need to do everything together with your partner? Which could amount to clinging and smothering? Or can you give him or her some space? Is it synchronous interactivity or time-delayed interaction that you seek? Do you immediately progress from casual acquaintance to full-fledged commitment? Or do you give it time and proceed incrementally and gradually and carefully?

There is a question also, of role allocation. Who decides on the allocation of roles and functions and duties in the couple? And how are these allocating? Do you typically talk over your roles, functions and responsibilities and reach an agreement explicitly? This is called explicit role allocation. Or do you let life dictate? Do you live it to life and play it by ear? It's role allocation by emergence. How specific are your roles?

Once the roles in your relationships have been defined, are they cast in stone? Are they rigid? Or are they subject to change as circumstances change and both of you grow and develop?

Essentially there are two types, two major models of relationships.

The type of relationship can be negotiated. Matchmaking, as simple as that.

So it's more of a business arrangement with some companionship thrown in.

The relationship can be emergent, can be romantic, love-based.

The type of partner. The partner could be a companion, a friend, and then you know, you seek out an active intellect, some charm, accomplishments, goal orientation, self-sufficiency. Or the partner can be a hypersexual, adventurer, or even a narcissist. Which of these two appeals to you?

The dynamics of your relationship. The relationship could be based on routines, full disclosure, common activities, hobbies, common growth goals. Or the relationship could be based on excitement, thrill, surprises.

The type of bond, the bond can be based on demonstrated exclusivity and perceived threat protocols where you communicate to your partner that you are feeling threatened, that you are hurt, that you feel insecure. Demonstrated exclusivity together with threat protocols, communication protocols. Or it could be an open relationship where both of you can do whatever you want, even in the sexual field.

There are then the territorial dimensions of the relationship.

There is a predefined relationship with predefined autonomy enclaves. These are areas of your life or even physical premises where you are autonomous, you have your privacy, and no one can barge in or ask you anything.

And there is another type of relationship where there is dependence and clinging and smothering and utter enmeshment of the two parties.

There is a type of relationship where there is spatial progression.

You start with separate apartments and you move in for a few days a week and then you end up cohabiting. So limited cohabitation with private spaces reserved in house or outside and then up to full cohabitation. Full cohabitation is the other part.

Then there is relationships with temporal progression.

You move incrementally and gradually and cautiously. And relationships which are immediate, full fledged.

So it's important to clearly define the model of relationship, to cohere with, to be compatible with the mates you select.

Once you've done that and once you've tackled your termination triggers by establishing communication protocols with your partner, the longevity of your relationship is virtually guaranteed

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

No "Wrong" Partner, Other Moronic Relationship Advice

Self-help advice often misguides individuals regarding mate selection, suggesting that one can choose the "wrong" partner, when in fact, every partner chosen aligns with one's psychological makeup and attachment style. Mate selection is an evolutionary skill that reflects one's emotional needs, leading individuals to select partners that cater to their self-destructive tendencies or attachment styles. Additionally, the past behavior of a partner is a strong predictor of future actions, making it crucial to inquire about their history rather than dismissing it as irrelevant. Ultimately, understanding one's own psychological patterns and thoroughly vetting potential partners is essential for healthier relationships.


Never Forgive Infidelity, Cheating!

The pursuit of validation for ignorance and biases is exploited by public intellectuals who promote the idea that infidelity can rejuvenate relationships, despite the inherent deception involved. Cheating, characterized by betrayal and concealment, is fundamentally unhealthy and indicative of deeper psychological issues within the relationship. Mentally healthy individuals should end relationships following infidelity, as remaining in such a situation suggests emotional impairment or dysfunction. Ultimately, the acceptance of an affair as a means to fix a relationship reflects a lack of mental well-being and an inability to establish healthy boundaries.


From Insecure to Flat Attachment: Narcissists, Psychopaths Never Bond (Compilation)

Attachment styles play a crucial role in shaping interpersonal relationships, with some individuals exhibiting what is termed "flat attachment," characterized by an inability to bond or relate to others. Flat attachers view people as interchangeable objects, moving seamlessly from one relationship to another without mourning the loss of previous connections. This detachment is often seen in narcissists and psychopaths, who lack the capacity for genuine intimacy and instead engage in superficial interactions. In contrast, individuals with secure or insecure attachment styles experience emotional complexities that influence their relationships, often leading to patterns of idealization and devaluation. Ultimately, understanding these dynamics is essential for navigating the challenges of intimacy and connection in human relationships.


TEST YOURSELF: Shadow's Complexes - Which Ones Have YOU Got?

Various psychological complexes can significantly impact individuals' behaviors and relationships. The Martyr complex involves prioritizing others' needs over one's own, often stemming from childhood experiences of parentification. The Persecution complex is characterized by paranoia and hypervigilance, typically resulting from trauma, while the Casanova and Don Juan complexes reflect different approaches to intimacy and sexual relationships, often linked to attachment issues. Other complexes, such as the God complex and the Inferiority complex, reveal patterns of self-perception and interpersonal dynamics that can lead to self-harm or unhealthy relationships.


2 Types of Bad Partner: Too Present, or Too Absent

Marriage and divorce rates indicate a significant trend of individuals selecting unsuitable partners, with many adults remaining lifelong singles. Two primary types of bad partners are identified: those who are emotionally absent but threaten presence when needed, and those who are overly present but withdraw when feeling suffocated. Individuals from dysfunctional families often develop insecure attachment styles, leading to flawed mate selection as they unconsciously seek to recreate unresolved childhood conflicts. This results in a cycle of alternating between these two types of partners, as they attempt to compensate for the emotional deficiencies experienced in their upbringing.


Insecure Attachment Styles In Cluster B Personalities ( YOU, The Dead Mother)

Attachment styles and disorders significantly influence interpersonal relationships, particularly in individuals with personality disorders such as narcissism, psychopathy, and borderline traits. Early experiences with caregivers, especially those characterized by emotional unavailability or dysfunction, shape a child's internal working model, which persists into adulthood and affects their ability to form healthy attachments. The concept of the "dead mother" illustrates how children may internalize a painful attachment model, leading to a cycle of seeking out similar dysfunctional relationships in adulthood. Additionally, the introduction of a fifth attachment style, termed "flat attachment," highlights individuals who are incapable of forming meaningful bonds, further complicating the dynamics of attachment and emotional investment in relationships. Understanding these patterns is crucial for addressing the emotional and psychological challenges faced by individuals with complex trauma and attachment disorders.


Test Yourself: Mortification, Hoovering, and Attraction Scales

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses two tools he has developed based on his database of people diagnosed with narcissistic personality disorder. The first tool, the Heartbreak and Recovery Scale, helps gauge mortification and predicts how long it will take a narcissist to recover from a traumatic breakup or infidelity. The second tool, the S1-S2 score, measures promiscuity and self-efficacy, and helps identify traits that make a potential partner irresistible to a narcissist. These tools are not peer-reviewed or vetted but are based on Vaknin's extensive research and analysis of his database.


Hurt in Intimacy: Path to Self-love (with Mike Kim, Standup Comedian)

Sex addiction and love addiction are distinct issues, with sex addiction characterized by a compulsive need for sexual encounters devoid of emotional connection, while love addiction involves using the experience of being in love to regulate internal emotional states. Both addictions reflect a process of objectifying partners, where the individual seeks to fulfill personal needs rather than genuinely connect with another person. Intimacy, often idealized, is portrayed as a challenging and vulnerable endeavor that requires significant emotional exposure, yet it is essential for self-actualization and personal growth. The self-help industry, while providing initial support, can perpetuate victimhood and hinder personal responsibility, leading individuals to remain trapped in a cycle of dependency rather than fostering true healing and self-awareness.


Muddle Intimacy, Emotions, Attachment Style, Sex

Intimacy, emotions, sex, and attachment are often misunderstood and conflated, leading to confusion in relationships. Intimacy is defined by physical proximity, vulnerability, and joint activities, and does not inherently require emotions, while emotions can lead to intimacy but are not a prerequisite. Attachment styles, which are shaped by early experiences, should ideally inform mate selection, but many people fail to consider them, leading to repeated poor relationship choices. The distinctions between these concepts are crucial for understanding human connections and improving relational dynamics.


Intimacy and Jealousy Regulate Relationships

In relationships, there are two ways to regulate behavior: intimacy and romantic jealousy. Healthy relationships achieve a balance between the two, but those with mood disorders or personality disorders cannot achieve intimacy and instead become fused together. To prevent abandonment, the partner may provoke romantic jealousy, but this can lead to the exact opposite effect and drive the other partner away. Finding the balance between intimacy and jealousy is difficult, and exaggerated regulatory behaviors can kill the relationship. The modern condition is that many people give up on relationships altogether.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy