5 Reasons To Grieve, Mourn: Varieties Of Grief And Mourning

Uploaded 5/17/2023, approx. 8 minute read

Now, those of you who have watched my videos know the difference between healthy grief, healthy mourning, which lasts about one year, and prolonged grief disorder, the new diagnosis in the latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual.

So, prolonged grief disorder lasts longer than one year, is intractable, there's no way to get over it, it involves obsessive compulsive features such as rumination, healthy grief, healthy mourning, abate, and then get integrated.

And once they're integrated, the feeling of grief and mourning is over, and all that's left are bittersweet memories.

This is the topic of today's relatively short video, the types or the varieties of grief.

Apropos grief, my name is Sam Vaknin, I'm the author of Malignant Self-Love: Narcissism Revisited, and I'm a former visiting professor of psychology.

And onward and upward we go.

There are essentially five types of grief, each one corresponding to an etiology. Each type of grief corresponds to a reason, a cause, which then triggers pathological pathways.

These pathways are either repressed and then the grief becomes healthy, and it's a form of processing which should be condoned and even encouraged, or the pathology becomes entrenched and the grief becomes prolonged and the person becomes depressed, and everyone around the person becomes anxious, and it's all a bloody mess.

So today we're going to discuss these five reasons.

We grieve over five things, five issues.

Number one, unrealized potential.

We grieve over what could have been our denied wishes, our broken dreams, our abrogated plans, and our demolished fantasies.

We are creatures of dreams and storytelling.

And so a big part of our lives we spend in daydreaming, imagining, hoping, planning, foreseeing.

And when reality does not correspond, negate all these, we tend to grieve and mourn.

We grieve and mourn, not reality, not something that has really happened. We grieve and mourn the unrealized potential, the lack of self-actualization, what could have been the scenarios that have never materialized.

We are unique in this. We are absolutely unique in this.

Grief generally is a human phenomenon, although animals do grieve.

But animals grieve realities, they grieve losses and so on.

Humans can grieve imagination itself.

I mentioned in my video yesterday, inhibited grief or inhibited grieving in borderline personality disorder.

And I recommend that you watch that video to get an angle on that variety of grief.

So unrealized potentials.

Number two, reason number two to grieve.

The discrepancy between fantasy and perception of reality.

The fantasy could be an idealization fantasy.

When we idealize someone or we idealize a situation or we idealize a country or we idealize anything, a belief, a faith, a church, a collective, we tend to idealize literally everything given the chance because it's much more comfortable, much more reassuring and safe and stable to inhabit, to reside in, to live in an ideal world than in a flawed, potentially evil universe.

We feel threatened when things are less than ideal.

So we tend to idealize as a form of defense.

Indeed, fantasy is a defense mechanism. It's a defense against reality.

But then if we don't have a major pathology such as narcissistic personality disorder or borderline personality disorder or bipolar disorder, if we don't have these kinds of disorders, reality intrudes.

Reality provides us with clues and information and data that contravene our fantasies, undermine them, challenge them, ridicule them.

And if we are healthy, we adhere to reality. We listen to reality. We adopt reality over fantasy.

But there's a heartbreak. There's a heartbreak involved in giving up the ideal picture of another person or of a place or of a period of life or of an institution.

Whenever we give up on an ideal, we give up on ourselves in that ideal.

So the perception of reality, when it is abysmally different to the fantasy, especially a fantasy of idealization, creates mourning and grieving.

It's a bit of a feeling of having been conned, having been outsmarted by ourselves, having deceived and cheated ourselves. It's a feeling of, you know, I've been stupid. I've been stupid to do this. I've been stupid to believe this.

So there is self-recrimination. There is a harsh inner critic that puts us down for having believed in the idealized fantasy in the first place.

Then at the same time, there's a mourning and grieving of the fantasy gone awry.

Reality is never as palatable, as friendly and as pleasant as fantasy.

The third reason to grieve is catastrophizing, a perception of threat. It is anticipated loss, abandonment, rejection, humiliation, fear itself. Fear has a lot to do with mourning and grieving because fear is about losing something and loss is always associated with grief.

And so when there is a perception of threat, we tend to catastrophize the threat. We tend to exaggerate it. It's a defense mechanism and a very useful one, evolutionarily speaking.

If you exaggerate the threat, you will be overprepared. And if you're overprepared, chances for survival are much higher.

So catastrophizing is very useful.

When there is a threat perception, we catastrophize, we already anticipate loss, and the loss becomes very real to us. And of course, we immediately start to mourn and grieve automatically.

The fourth reason is irretrievable loss, actual irretrievable loss. Someone has passed away. A loved one is diseased, deceased. The dream itself is ticking by and going away.

And so these losses are immutable, irretrievable. There's nothing we can do about them.

And yet they're very real. And this inexorability, this helplessness, this hopelessness drive us to a sense of mourning and grieving.

One could say that we are always in a state of grief. We are mourning our demise, which is inevitable. We know that we're going to die. We apprehend our mortality as distinct from any other species.

And so from the day we grasp the concept of death, we start to mourn ourselves, mourn ourselves again, mourn what we could have been, mourn the discrepancy between the fantasy of immortality, the denial of death, and reality, the catastrophizing of death itself, threat perception, and the inevitable irretrievable, immutable loss of ourselves, which leads me to the most profound type of grief.

The type of grief that becomes an identity. And that grief is very common, for example, in children who are abused and then grow and become co-dependence or narcissism. Narcissism is a kind of prolonged grief disorder, as is probably borderline personality disorder, as is dependent personality disorder, co-dependency, and so on and so forth.

Anyone who has been subjected to a loss of identity, a loss of boundaries, loss of goals, and a loss of one's vision of the future, aka ego ideal in psychoanalytic parlance, anyone who has been subjected to this kind of profoundly personal losses will grieve for life and grief then becomes a response mechanism, a coping strategy.

And so when the child is denied the ability to separate from the parent and to become an individual, when the child's boundaries are not respected, when the child is penalized for having set boundaries in the first place, or for attempting to become his or her own person, that child is shamed into grief.

This kind of child mourns and grieves his inability to become himself and also mourns and grieves her mistreatment by parental figures. Shame is the flip side of grief because grief involves the deep-set sensation of helplessness.

We are helpless in the face of death. We are hopeless and helpless in the face of loss. There's nothing we can do.

Life, the world, reality, they're all stronger than us.

And so we mourn and grieve our limitations. We mourn and grieve what we are as opposed to what we could have become. We mourn and grieve our secession as opposed to our existence.

And in the case of narcissism, borderline, these people mourn and grieve their emptiness where a human being should have been full-fledged, happy, joyful, optimistic human being.

And so early childhood abuse fosters a prolonged grief disorder, lifelong, prolonged grief disorder.

But we do react with grief and mourning to life's events and crises. And they belong to the five categories that I've just described.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Mourning Yourself After Narcissistic Abuse

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the concept of prolonged grief disorder (PGD), previously known as complicated grief, which is characterized by an inability to move on from a loss. He explains that grief can become a central organizing principle in a person's life, leading to a constricted existence and an inability to enjoy life. Vaknin suggests that everyone experiences prolonged grief at some point, and it is considered pathological if it lasts longer than a year. He also delves into the relationship between narcissists and their victims, describing how narcissists can induce a state of prolonged grief in their victims by offering a simulation of unconditional love and then withdrawing it, leaving the victim feeling abandoned and mourning the loss of the relationship, which was never real to begin with. Vaknin emphasizes the importance of separating from the narcissist both physically and mentally to break the symbiotic relationship and begin the process of healing and individuation.

Narcissist as Grieving Infant

In this video, Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the concept of prolonged grief disorder and its connection to narcissism. He explains that narcissists are like traumatized children trapped in adult bodies, and they experience profound sadness and depression as a result of their childhood experiences. He also references a recent study that links childhood maltreatment to depression, insecure attachment styles, and difficulties in maintaining intimate relationships in adulthood.

Alcohol+Covert Narcissist=Antisocial Grandiose Narcissist

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the effects of alcohol on covert narcissists. He explains that alcohol can transform a covert narcissist into an overt narcissist, leading to reckless and psychopathic behavior. He argues that alcoholism is a choice, not a brain disorder, and that alcohol affects empathy, disinhibits behavior, and distorts perception of attractiveness. He also delves into the psychological reasons why covert narcissists turn to alcohol and the impact of alcohol on their behavior and self-perception.

Real Narcissists are Covert, Grandiose Narcissists are Psychopaths

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses compensatory narcissism, self-discrepancy theory, and anosognosia in narcissism. He reviews a recent study that provides evidence for the existence of compensatory narcissism and explains the distinction between vulnerable and grandiose narcissism. He also addresses the concept of anosognosia and its relevance to narcissism.

Mama's Boy or Daddy's Girl? (Compilation)

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses how various types of dysfunctional fathers can impact the development and expression of pathological narcissism in their children. He explains that while the formation of pathological narcissism occurs in the first 36 months of life and is primarily influenced by the mother or maternal figure, the father's role becomes significant later on, shaping how the child's narcissism manifests. Vaknin categorizes fathers who exacerbate narcissism in their children into several types, including the dead father, the shameful father, the intermittent father, the antisocial entitled father, the fantasy-prone father, the harsh and critical father, the unjust and sadistic father, the dysregulated father, the incestuous father, the parentifying father, the instrumentalizing father, the pedestalizing father, and the submissive, codependent father. Each type contributes to the child's narcissistic pathology in different ways, often leading to a variety of narcissistic outcomes in adulthood.

Simple Trick: Tell Apart Narcissist, Psychopath, Borderline

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the concept of stability and instability in narcissistic personalities. He distinguishes between two types of narcissists: compensatory stability and enhancing instability. He also explores the role of appearance and substance in the narcissistic pathology, and the differences between celebrity narcissists and career narcissists. Vaknin emphasizes the complexity of human behavior and warns against oversimplifying generalizations about narcissists.

Overt+Covert Narcissist in One Person: Self-supply (44:17), Binary Narcissism

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the concept of a binary system in narcissism, where both overt and covert narcissistic self-states coexist within an individual. This rare condition occurs when the overt narcissist collapses and fails to transition into a covert narcissist, resulting in both self-states being active simultaneously. This creates internal conflict and dissonance, as the overt self-state attacks the covert self-state, generating self-supply for both. The educational sublimatory channel, which encourages humility, healthy supply, self-esteem, honest communication, and empathy, can be used as a potential healing mechanism in therapy for individuals with this binary system.

Narcissist Female Bosses Outbest Male Narcissist CEOs

In this lecture, Professor Sam Vaknin discusses the prevalence of narcissism in corporate leadership, particularly focusing on the performance of narcissistic female chief executive officers. He highlights a study that suggests narcissistic female CEOs outperform their male counterparts and that their narcissism is associated with improved company performance. The study also suggests that female CEOs are able to suppress the dark side of narcissism and leverage traits such as empathy and networking, leading to superior corporate outcomes. Additionally, the lecture touches on the impact of narcissistic tendencies of chief financial officers on corporate digital transformation, suggesting that narcissism in upper management may be a beneficial corporate asset.

Narcissistic Families: Pseudomutual, Pseudohostile

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses two types of dysfunctional families: pseudo-mutual and pseudo-hostile. Pseudo-mutual families appear harmonious but suppress individuality and authenticity, while pseudo-hostile families engage in constant bickering to avoid deeper emotions. These family dynamics can lead to long-lasting impacts on children, hindering their development and sense of self. The professor also delves into the psychological background and the impact of these family dynamics on mental health.

Why Won’t S/he Grow Up: Precocious Adulthood Syndrome (PrAS)

In this lecture, Professor Sam Vaknin proposes a new clinical entity called Precautious Adulthood Syndrome, or adultification, which is brought on by three vectors: chronic illness, sexual abuse in early childhood to early puberty, and parentifying or instrumentalizing the child. Adultification can lead to compensatory infantilism, known as the Peter Pan syndrome, coupled with imposter syndrome. Adultified children grow up feeling responsible for everyone around them, become control freaks, and are self-reliant. They trust no one and always get involved in conflicts as arbiters or peacemakers. Adultified children resemble borderlines in that they engage in compensatory behaviors that are not calibrated and not proportionate.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy