Background

Fear of Intimacy Rationalized

Uploaded 9/23/2017, approx. 6 minute read

My name is Sam Vaknin, and I am the author of Malignant Self-Love, Narcissism Revisited.

We are all acquainted with people who fear intimacy. They have an absolute phobia of intimacy. They are averse to anything which smacks of closeness, attachment and bonding.

Why is that?

Well, first of all, these kind of people, they are afraid of exposing their vulnerabilities, their failings, their shortcomings. They feel that if they denude themselves, if they undress, so to speak, metaphorically or literally, they are putting themselves in the hands of the other person, for better and possibly, for worse.

And the second reason for fear of intimacy is commitment phobia.

These people are afraid to commit themselves. They are terrified of getting trapped in some kind of long-term schedule with obligations and duties and timetables.

But both fear of exposing one's vulnerabilities and fear of committing oneself to a long-term relationship. Both these indicate, betray, a deep distrust. Distrust about the world, about the world as a friendly place. Distrust in other people.

The belief that the world, essentially the universe, is a hostile environment, a jungle. And also distrust of the future as a friendly period of time.

The innate conviction that things are liable to get only worse and one better watch one's step ahead of time.

So this fear of intimacy is a compounded phenomenon.

And in a dialogue, the inner script of people who fear intimacy is composed of several distinct strands.


First of all, there is the classic strum.

This potential intimate partner is going to harm me, is going to hurt me, is going to end badly, is going to destroy my life, is going to ruin my sense of well-being, is going to hurt my emotions. I will be left with nothing. I will be left with no one. I will be left in pain and agony, etc.

There is this catastrophizing, this scenario of all relationships end badly, so why start one at all?

And then there is the opposite strand, the bad object strand. I am worthless, I am bad, I am useless, so I am no good, I am crazy. I will hurt this potential intimate partner. I will destroy his or her life. I must get away from him or her, and I am doing this for his or her own good.

So it's exactly the exact opposite.

The first is a kind of autoplastic defense, blaming others for failures, defeats and mishaps.

And the second strand is an autoplastic defense, blaming oneself for everything that goes bad, everything that turns sour.

There is an external locus of control and an internal locus of control.

The belief that one's life is determined by outside forces and by other people, or the belief that one's life is determined by one's innate qualities, or in this case, one's innate shortcomings, failures, destructive, disorganized and chaotic personality, and possibly mental health disorders.

All people who fear intimacy ultimately end up devaluing the potential or the real intimate partner.

They focus on his weaknesses, shortcomings, mistakes, his judgments and failures. They ascribe to the intimate partner the cause for ending the relationship.

They say, I ended the relationship because he abused me. I entered the relationship because she betrayed me. I entered the relationship because something was initiated and instigated by my intimate partner over which I had no control, something which I could not mitigate or ameliorate.

And having found myself trapped in this conundrum, I exited the relationship because that was the only solution.

In the process of ascribing guilt to one's intimate partner, one also tends to devalue the intimate partner as a source of misconduct, misbehavior, as the found of dead traits and dead behaviors.

Imagining the future with the potential intimate partner is not easy for people who fear intimacy because they believe the world is hostile, because they believe the future is bad or is bound to be worse than the present.

They always imagine a relationship as bleak and pleasant with dead, painful outcomes. He will, anyhow, abandon me or leave me. He will hurt me.

Living with her will be dull and oppressive. Our sex life will fizzle out and dwindle, etc.

All kinds of catastrophizing scenarios, negative automatic thoughts, which are attached to the intimacy and to its inevitably sour fruits. Catastrophizing is a cognitive deficit.

It is one of the main issues tackled in cognitive behavioral therapy. It is the conviction or the belief that things will not only get worse, but will invariably get out of control. That one will never be able to reassert one's mastery of one's own life.

Intimacy, therefore, leading invariably and ineluctably to a catastrophic consequence, threatens the person's ability to exert some control over his or her life. Intimacy threatens the person's belief that he is in charge or she is in charge of his or her life.

And so there is a foundational distrust at the core of fear of intimacy. The person distrusts the potential intimate partner to make one happy.

The person disbelieves that the intimate partner has intentions and feelings which are essentially aligned with the best interests of the person who fears intimacy.

When one fears intimacy, one fears the worst about one's intimate partner.

One, for instance, assumes that the intimate partner is manipulative or that the intimate partner imprisons or suffocates the person.

Oh, the intimate partner is on some path of abusing or exploiting and so on.

So the person who fears intimacy ascribes to his or her intimate partner mild intentions.

In other words, the person who fears intimacy is hypervigilant or in extreme cases, paramount.

Doubting one's own judgment, one's ability to choose right and one's capacity to appraise the situation properly and correctly, analyze this distrust because what have you, if you can judge other people properly, if you can read other people correctly, then there's no need to fear their intentions, their manipulativeness, their exploitativeness and so on.

It is only when you doubt your own ability and capacity to test reality and to read it properly, to decipher other people, to comprehend their motivation and where they're going, to judge their character correctly.

It is only then that you lose your compass, you prefer to withdraw and avoid, rather than get entangled in something over which you are bound to lose control and which is liable because you have great harm and pain.

So fear of intimacy is a form of diffuse anxiety and uncomfortable, but fuzzy sensation that something real and something really bad is happening or is about to happen and that one needs urgently to get away before the catastrophe is.

The person who fears intimacy cannot point the finger at anything specific, it's in the air, it's ambient, it's kind of by proxy and this diffuse anxiety, this meteor shower of unease is what causes such people to suddenly withdraw and avoid the intimate partner exactly when the intimate partner believes that a modicum of intimacy has been achieved and that the relationship is on the right track.

There can be nothing more disorienting than having a relationship with a person who fears intimacy.

It's an approach avoidance repetition compulsion, it's a cycle that can never be broken or interrupted where the intimate partner gets closer to the person who fears intimacy, the closer he gets, the more the target, so to speak, recedes.

It's a never ending race, never ending chase which never ever culminates in a happy ending.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Fear of Intimacy, Cheating, and Preemptive Abandonment

People who fear intimacy will choose partners who are also afraid of intimacy, and they will both make sure there is no intimacy in the relationship. Abusive relationships are mutually exclusive to intimacy, and people with fear of intimacy choose abusers as their partners because being abused is their comfort zone. Narcissists are terrified of losing their source of secondary narcissistic supply, usually their spouse or intimate partner, and they push their intimate partner away to allay their anxiety over the impending and ineluctable loss of the relationship.


Codependence and Dependent Personality Disorder

Co-dependence is a complex multi-faceted and multi-dimensional defense against the co-dependence fears and needs. There are four types of co-dependence: abandonment, control, vicarious, and counter-dependent. The dependent personality disorder is a much disputed mental health diagnosis, and clinicians use subjective terms such as craving, clinging, stifling, humiliating, and submissive. Codependents are possessed with fantastic worries and concerns and are paralyzed by their abandonment anxiety and fear of separation.


Masochistic Personality Disorder (Masochism)

Masochists often internalize feelings of worthlessness and unworthiness, leading them to engage in self-destructive behaviors that undermine their own happiness and success. They tend to seek out painful experiences and relationships, rejecting help and support while gravitating towards situations that result in failure and disappointment. Their actions serve as a means of catharsis, relieving pent-up anxiety but simultaneously avoiding intimacy and its benefits. Additionally, masochists may provoke negative responses from others to reinforce their self-perception, finding comfort in humiliation and defeat.


Intimacy and Jealousy Regulate Relationships

In relationships, there are two ways to regulate behavior: intimacy and romantic jealousy. Healthy relationships achieve a balance between the two, but those with mood disorders or personality disorders cannot achieve intimacy and instead become fused together. To prevent abandonment, the partner may provoke romantic jealousy, but this can lead to the exact opposite effect and drive the other partner away. Finding the balance between intimacy and jealousy is difficult, and exaggerated regulatory behaviors can kill the relationship. The modern condition is that many people give up on relationships altogether.


Muddle Intimacy, Emotions, Attachment Style, Sex

Intimacy, emotions, sex, and attachment are often misunderstood and conflated, leading to confusion in relationships. Intimacy is defined by physical proximity, vulnerability, and joint activities, and does not inherently require emotions, while emotions can lead to intimacy but are not a prerequisite. Attachment styles, which are shaped by early experiences, should ideally inform mate selection, but many people fail to consider them, leading to repeated poor relationship choices. The distinctions between these concepts are crucial for understanding human connections and improving relational dynamics.


Hurt in Intimacy: Path to Self-love (with Mike Kim, Standup Comedian)

Sex addiction and love addiction are distinct issues, with sex addiction characterized by a compulsive need for sexual encounters devoid of emotional connection, while love addiction involves using the experience of being in love to regulate internal emotional states. Both addictions reflect a process of objectifying partners, where the individual seeks to fulfill personal needs rather than genuinely connect with another person. Intimacy, often idealized, is portrayed as a challenging and vulnerable endeavor that requires significant emotional exposure, yet it is essential for self-actualization and personal growth. The self-help industry, while providing initial support, can perpetuate victimhood and hinder personal responsibility, leading individuals to remain trapped in a cycle of dependency rather than fostering true healing and self-awareness.


Don't Let Loneliness Define or Guide You! (Excerpt)

Loneliness drives individuals to overlook red flags in potential partners, leading them to idealize narcissists who exploit their need for companionship. People often ignore their gut instincts and warning signs during initial encounters, justifying their choices later as self-deception. The prevalence of loneliness and singlehood in society highlights a growing disconnect, with many individuals struggling to find meaningful connections. Ultimately, self-acceptance and self-love are crucial for overcoming this vulnerability and fostering healthier relationships.


Love Addiction: Craving Infatuation, Limerence

Love addiction is a complex and relatively new topic in psychopathology, characterized by an individual's maladaptive and pervasive interest in romantic partners, often leading to a lack of control and negative consequences. Love addicts often fall in love with fantasies or complete strangers, and their addiction leads to extreme emotional dysregulation and unboundaried behavior. The role of fantasy in love addiction is significant, and it is closely related to codependency and other issues. Treatment for love addiction is still limited, but cognitive behavior therapy and support groups like Sex and Love Addicts Anonymous may help some individuals.


Never Forgive Infidelity, Cheating!

The pursuit of validation for ignorance and biases is exploited by public intellectuals who promote the idea that infidelity can rejuvenate relationships, despite the inherent deception involved. Cheating, characterized by betrayal and concealment, is fundamentally unhealthy and indicative of deeper psychological issues within the relationship. Mentally healthy individuals should end relationships following infidelity, as remaining in such a situation suggests emotional impairment or dysfunction. Ultimately, the acceptance of an affair as a means to fix a relationship reflects a lack of mental well-being and an inability to establish healthy boundaries.


From Insecure to Flat Attachment: Narcissists, Psychopaths Never Bond (Compilation)

Attachment styles play a crucial role in shaping interpersonal relationships, with some individuals exhibiting what is termed "flat attachment," characterized by an inability to bond or relate to others. Flat attachers view people as interchangeable objects, moving seamlessly from one relationship to another without mourning the loss of previous connections. This detachment is often seen in narcissists and psychopaths, who lack the capacity for genuine intimacy and instead engage in superficial interactions. In contrast, individuals with secure or insecure attachment styles experience emotional complexities that influence their relationships, often leading to patterns of idealization and devaluation. Ultimately, understanding these dynamics is essential for navigating the challenges of intimacy and connection in human relationships.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy