Fear of Intimacy Rationalized

Uploaded 9/23/2017, approx. 6 minute read

My name is Sam Vaknin, and I am the author of Malignant Self-Love, Narcissism Revisited.

We are all acquainted with people who fear intimacy. They have an absolute phobia of intimacy. They are averse to anything which smacks of closeness, attachment and bonding.

Why is that?

Well, first of all, these kind of people, they are afraid of exposing their vulnerabilities, their failings, their shortcomings. They feel that if they denude themselves, if they undress, so to speak, metaphorically or literally, they are putting themselves in the hands of the other person, for better and possibly, for worse.

And the second reason for fear of intimacy is commitment phobia.

These people are afraid to commit themselves. They are terrified of getting trapped in some kind of long-term schedule with obligations and duties and timetables.

But both fear of exposing one's vulnerabilities and fear of committing oneself to a long-term relationship. Both these indicate, betray, a deep distrust. Distrust about the world, about the world as a friendly place. Distrust in other people.

The belief that the world, essentially the universe, is a hostile environment, a jungle. And also distrust of the future as a friendly period of time.

The innate conviction that things are liable to get only worse and one better watch one's step ahead of time.

So this fear of intimacy is a compounded phenomenon.

And in a dialogue, the inner script of people who fear intimacy is composed of several distinct strands.

First of all, there is the classic strum.

This potential intimate partner is going to harm me, is going to hurt me, is going to end badly, is going to destroy my life, is going to ruin my sense of well-being, is going to hurt my emotions. I will be left with nothing. I will be left with no one. I will be left in pain and agony, etc.

There is this catastrophizing, this scenario of all relationships end badly, so why start one at all?

And then there is the opposite strand, the bad object strand. I am worthless, I am bad, I am useless, so I am no good, I am crazy. I will hurt this potential intimate partner. I will destroy his or her life. I must get away from him or her, and I am doing this for his or her own good.

So it's exactly the exact opposite.

The first is a kind of autoplastic defense, blaming others for failures, defeats and mishaps.

And the second strand is an autoplastic defense, blaming oneself for everything that goes bad, everything that turns sour.

There is an external locus of control and an internal locus of control.

The belief that one's life is determined by outside forces and by other people, or the belief that one's life is determined by one's innate qualities, or in this case, one's innate shortcomings, failures, destructive, disorganized and chaotic personality, and possibly mental health disorders.

All people who fear intimacy ultimately end up devaluing the potential or the real intimate partner.

They focus on his weaknesses, shortcomings, mistakes, his judgments and failures. They ascribe to the intimate partner the cause for ending the relationship.

They say, I ended the relationship because he abused me. I entered the relationship because she betrayed me. I entered the relationship because something was initiated and instigated by my intimate partner over which I had no control, something which I could not mitigate or ameliorate.

And having found myself trapped in this conundrum, I exited the relationship because that was the only solution.

In the process of ascribing guilt to one's intimate partner, one also tends to devalue the intimate partner as a source of misconduct, misbehavior, as the found of dead traits and dead behaviors.

Imagining the future with the potential intimate partner is not easy for people who fear intimacy because they believe the world is hostile, because they believe the future is bad or is bound to be worse than the present.

They always imagine a relationship as bleak and pleasant with dead, painful outcomes. He will, anyhow, abandon me or leave me. He will hurt me.

Living with her will be dull and oppressive. Our sex life will fizzle out and dwindle, etc.

All kinds of catastrophizing scenarios, negative automatic thoughts, which are attached to the intimacy and to its inevitably sour fruits. Catastrophizing is a cognitive deficit.

It is one of the main issues tackled in cognitive behavioral therapy. It is the conviction or the belief that things will not only get worse, but will invariably get out of control. That one will never be able to reassert one's mastery of one's own life.

Intimacy, therefore, leading invariably and ineluctably to a catastrophic consequence, threatens the person's ability to exert some control over his or her life. Intimacy threatens the person's belief that he is in charge or she is in charge of his or her life.

And so there is a foundational distrust at the core of fear of intimacy. The person distrusts the potential intimate partner to make one happy.

The person disbelieves that the intimate partner has intentions and feelings which are essentially aligned with the best interests of the person who fears intimacy.

When one fears intimacy, one fears the worst about one's intimate partner.

One, for instance, assumes that the intimate partner is manipulative or that the intimate partner imprisons or suffocates the person.

Oh, the intimate partner is on some path of abusing or exploiting and so on.

So the person who fears intimacy ascribes to his or her intimate partner mild intentions.

In other words, the person who fears intimacy is hypervigilant or in extreme cases, paramount.

Doubting one's own judgment, one's ability to choose right and one's capacity to appraise the situation properly and correctly, analyze this distrust because what have you, if you can judge other people properly, if you can read other people correctly, then there's no need to fear their intentions, their manipulativeness, their exploitativeness and so on.

It is only when you doubt your own ability and capacity to test reality and to read it properly, to decipher other people, to comprehend their motivation and where they're going, to judge their character correctly.

It is only then that you lose your compass, you prefer to withdraw and avoid, rather than get entangled in something over which you are bound to lose control and which is liable because you have great harm and pain.

So fear of intimacy is a form of diffuse anxiety and uncomfortable, but fuzzy sensation that something real and something really bad is happening or is about to happen and that one needs urgently to get away before the catastrophe is.

The person who fears intimacy cannot point the finger at anything specific, it's in the air, it's ambient, it's kind of by proxy and this diffuse anxiety, this meteor shower of unease is what causes such people to suddenly withdraw and avoid the intimate partner exactly when the intimate partner believes that a modicum of intimacy has been achieved and that the relationship is on the right track.

There can be nothing more disorienting than having a relationship with a person who fears intimacy.

It's an approach avoidance repetition compulsion, it's a cycle that can never be broken or interrupted where the intimate partner gets closer to the person who fears intimacy, the closer he gets, the more the target, so to speak, recedes.

It's a never ending race, never ending chase which never ever culminates in a happy ending.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Fear of Intimacy, Cheating, and Preemptive Abandonment

People who fear intimacy will choose partners who are also afraid of intimacy, and they will both make sure there is no intimacy in the relationship. Abusive relationships are mutually exclusive to intimacy, and people with fear of intimacy choose abusers as their partners because being abused is their comfort zone. Narcissists are terrified of losing their source of secondary narcissistic supply, usually their spouse or intimate partner, and they push their intimate partner away to allay their anxiety over the impending and ineluctable loss of the relationship.

Codependent's Inner Voice: "I Can’t Live Without Him/Her"

Co-dependence is an addiction that gives meaning to life and satisfies the need for excitement and thrills. It places the individual at the center of attention and allows them to manipulate people around them to do their bidding. Extreme cases require professional help, but most people with dependent traits and behaviors can help themselves by realizing that the world never comes to an end when relationships do. Analyzing addiction, writing down the worst possible scenario, making a list of all the consequences of the breakup, and sharing thoughts, fears, and emotions with friends and family can help.

When the Narcissist's Parents Die

The death of a narcissist's parents can be a complicated experience. The narcissist has a mixed reaction to their passing, feeling both elation and grief. The parents are often the source of the narcissist's trauma and continue to haunt them long after they die. The death of the parents also represents a loss of a reliable source of narcissistic supply, which can lead to severe depression. Additionally, the narcissist's unfinished business with their parents can lead to unresolved conflicts and pressure that deforms their personality.

Codependence and Dependent Personality Disorder

Co-dependence is a complex multi-faceted and multi-dimensional defense against the co-dependence fears and needs. There are four types of co-dependence: abandonment, control, vicarious, and counter-dependent. The dependent personality disorder is a much disputed mental health diagnosis, and clinicians use subjective terms such as craving, clinging, stifling, humiliating, and submissive. Codependents are possessed with fantastic worries and concerns and are paralyzed by their abandonment anxiety and fear of separation.

Hitchcock's Halloween Treat (or Trick?): Psycho, or Embodied Introject

Norman Bates of Psycho fame is analyzed in relation to narcissistic mother identification. The film is a morality play where bad things happen to bad people. Norman is humorous and charming but has a harsh inner critic and is unable to say certain words. He has a misogynistic view of women and is deeply influenced by his mother's introject. Norman's actions and relationships are driven by his need to be seen and his hatred of women. He embodies his mother's introject and is diagnosed with OSDD, not multiple personality disorder. Norman's actions are driven by his need to be seen and his hatred of women, and he ultimately turns himself in to the police.

Victimhood Movements Hijacked by Narcissists and Psychopaths

Social justice movements are often infiltrated by psychopaths and narcissists who rise to the top and become the public face of the movement. These individuals seek attention, power, and narcissistic supply. The movements start with legitimate grievances, but often deteriorate into identity politics and grandiosity. Left-leaning movements tend to be more entitled and grandiose, while right-leaning movements are more conspiracy-minded and psychopathic. Narcissists and psychopaths flock to these movements and become leaders, ultimately taking over the movement.

Magical Thinking in Personality Disorders and Conspiracy Theorists

Today's topic is malignant magical thinking. Magical thinking is a healthy stage of development in early childhood, but in adulthood, it can indicate underlying pathology. It involves the belief that thoughts can affect reality, and can lead to delusional disorder. Magical thinking is common in mental health disorders and is exploited by scammers. It is associated with narcissism, borderline personality disorder, psychopathy, and conspiracy theories. It is also linked to ignorance and conspiracism. This refusal to grow up and embrace reality can have destructive consequences for society and the individual.

Narcissist: Mother Looms Large

The success or failure of a child's separation from their mother determines their personal history, autonomy, and sense of self. The mother is the benchmark against which everything in the child's future is measured. If the mother does not let go, the child does not go, and if the mother is a dependent narcissistic type, the child's growth prospects are doomed. The death of the mother is a devastating shock and a deliverance, and with the death of his mother, the narcissist embarks on a process of healing.

Self-sufficiency and Narcissism (ENGLISH responses, with Nárcisz Coach)

Narcissism is problematic because it leads to a zero-sum game mentality, where collaboration and cooperation are seen as unnecessary. This mindset is exacerbated by technological advancements that make people self-sufficient, leading to a decline in collaboration and cooperation in various aspects of society. As a result, narcissistic societies perpetuate income inequality and create a majority of losers and a minority of winners. This ultimately leads to negative outcomes for society as a whole.

Daughters of Narcissistic Mothers

Narcissistic mothers can have a significant impact on their adult daughters' relationships, with children of narcissistic parents being ill-adapted and prone to deploying psychological defense mechanisms. They can become co-dependent, needy, demanding, and submissive, fearing abandonment and displaying immature behaviors. Some children of narcissistic parents become inverted narcissists, craving relationships with narcissists, while others become counterdependent or even narcissists themselves. Narcissistic mothers micromanage their child's life and encourage dependent and infantile behaviors, emotionally blackmailing them and threatening to disinherit them if they do not comply with their wishes.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy