Background

WRONG QUESTION: What Have I Got to Lose?

Uploaded 8/29/2024, approx. 4 minute read

When you are faced with a life-altering decision, for example, should I watch another Sam Vaknin video, you usually conduct, automatically, a cost-benefit analysis.

And yes, this applies to all decisions and all choices. Even ones that are trivial, tangential and peripheral.

Throughout life, we have to make thousands of choices a day. And each and every one of these forks in the road, each and every cross path and crossroad, and force us into considering gains, benefits versus losses, the costs.

And yet, I have a tip for you. Listen well.

Never ask, what have I got to lose?

Always inquire, what can I gain by choosing to behave this way? What would be the benefits if I were to opt for this course of action and adopt these set of measures and steps?

Why this asymmetry between gains and losses? Why this discrepancy?

Why don't I advise you to consider equally costs and benefits, losses and gains?

Because our brains are wired to gauge gains and benefits accurately and to evaluate risks and losses inaccurately, imprecisely, wrongly.

And we tend to overestimate risks or underestimate dangers. We never get it right.

If we were fully cognizant and aware of the set of risks and dangers out there, we would never date. We would never take a loan from our bank. We would never get married. We would never have children. We would never have a life. We would never leave home.

We would endure a process called constriction.

To avoid this, nature has equipped us with a device known as the brain. Some of us have it, others aspire to have it.

And this device, the brain, performs these analyses on the fly, appraises gains accurately and minimizes risks and dangers to allow us to grandiosely take on the world, confront reality and then mesh ourselves in our environment.

Now, sometimes we overestimate risks and dangers. And that is usually the case when the gains are very minimal.

It is a kind of fail-safe mechanism in the brain.

But when the gains are substantial or visible or ostentatious or when the gains are important, are critical in a specific juncture in our lives, we then tend to minimize the attendant costs and risks and dangers and we tend to move on.

We tend to take on challenges. We tend to engage in activities which are new to us. We tend to adopt courses of action whose end outcome is not guaranteed or even predictable.

So because you are not equipped to evaluate costs and risk appropriately and you are highly equipped to evaluate gains appropriately.

This is the way of evolution.

I advise you to never ask the question, what have I got to lose?

Because you are incapable of coming up with a correct accurate answer to this.

The losses are likely either to be much higher than you could ever imagine or much lower than you think.

At any rate, you're not likely to get it right.

So don't ask this question. Instead, ask yourself, what can I gain by choosing to behave this way, by choosing this course of action, by adopting this set of procedures and decisions?

You're likely to evaluate the gain pretty accurately.

Now, what do you do if you believe that you stand nothing to lose and nothing to gain if it's a totally neutral situation?

Well then there's a principle, two principles actually.

Do no harm. Choose the course of action that minimizes harm to other people. Don't hurt other people. Don't damage other people. Do no harm.

And the second principle is, do unto others as you want them to treat you. Treat other people the way you want them to treat you.

These are actually the two pillars and foundations of morality if you adopt these two principles you've got the totality of every known moral system ever, do no harm and treat others the way you want them to treat you. That's the entire teaching, the entire Torah, as Rabbi Hillel said in the Talmud.

So, what have I got to lose? Maybe everything. Maybe everything, maybe nothing, but why gamble? Gamble? What have I got to gain?

I know what I've got to gain and as a minimum what you've got to gain is moral behavior. When you behave morally and conscientiously it gives you a good feeling. It renders you egosyntonic. It calms you down. It's anxiolytic. It reduces anxiety. It makes you feel good about yourself and justifiably so.

Good luck.

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Arrested Empathy: Instinctual, Emotional Cognitive, and Cold Empathy

Empathy is a three-partite model consisting of instinctual, emotional, and cognitive components, with normal development occurring in phases during childhood. Narcissists and psychopaths, however, lack true empathy, often exhibiting a form of "cold empathy" that is detached and self-serving, using their understanding of others solely for personal gain. The decline of empathy in contemporary society is linked to the disintegration of social institutions and an increase in anti-social behavior, leading to a cultural malaise where narcissistic conduct becomes normative. Ultimately, empathy is crucial for moral development and interpersonal relationships, yet its absence signifies emotional and cognitive deficits that hinder genuine connections with others.


How Porn Destroyed Sex (and Narcissism, of course) (ENGLISH responses)

Pornography has severe psychological effects, even on those who consume it casually. It diminishes the ability to connect intimacy to sexual arousal, objectifies the female body, and reduces it to body parts. Pornography also includes a lot of aggression, which leads teenagers to expect real-life sex to be aggressive and violent. The boundaries between pornography and real-life sex have blurred to the point that men feel entitled to demand from women to be porn stars. Women have developed pornographic availability as a counter to pornography, and the whole real-life sex has become pornographic. Women are in a terrible situation because they have to escalate to attract men. Men don't need women anymore because the only thing that a woman could give that was exclusive was her anatomy, and now, this is free. Women and men


Down God’s Rabbit Hole: Religious Apologetics

The seminar in Romania fostered a strong sense of community among participants, which was gratifying to witness. A book titled "I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist" was gifted, prompting a critical examination of its arguments, which were found to be lacking in philosophical rigor and scientific accuracy. Key points of contention included the misrepresentation of Kant's philosophy, the flawed anthropic principle, and the conflation of information with messages in DNA. Ultimately, the discussion emphasized the importance of reason and critical thinking over faith-based beliefs, arguing that religion can be seen as a delusion that detracts from a rational understanding of reality.


Narcissistic Defences and Personality

Narcissistic personalities are prone to depression, anxiety, shame, self-destructiveness, or rage when their habitual gratifications are threatened. Narcissism is an evolved version of the psychological defense mechanism known as splitting, where the narcissist either idealizes or devalues objects. The narcissist is obsessed with securing a reliable and continuous source of admiration, adulation, affirmation, and attention, and will become an evil person if they cannot secure positive supply. Narcissistic personalities slide the meanings of events to place themselves in a better light and maintain logical consistency while minimizing evil or weakness and exaggerating innocence or control.


You! Be GRATEFUL, HONORED That Narcissist Lets You Serve, Witness Him (Sacrificial Entitlement)

The text discusses the concept of sacrificial entitlement in narcissists. It explains how narcissists believe they are sacrificing their divine qualities to be with their partners and expect gratitude and obedience in return. The text also delves into the narcissist's perspective on the breakup, viewing it as ingratitude from the partner. It highlights the narcissist's belief that they have given their partner everything and the partner's rejection is seen as a form of devaluation.


Erotomanic Stalker

The erotomaniac stalker believes they are in love with their victim and will go to great lengths to prove their devotion, including making legal, financial, and emotional decisions for the victim without their consent. They ignore personal boundaries and intrude on privacy, and may even force themselves on the victim sexually. Coping strategies include ignoring the stalker, not responding to any communication, returning gifts, and avoiding any contact with the stalker. Any contact with the stalker is seen as a sign of love, so it is best to avoid them completely.


Borderline’s False Self Unlike Narcissist’s (see PINNED COMMENT)

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by a complex interplay between a false self and a relatively functional true self, leading to emotional dysregulation and identity disturbance. Unlike narcissistic personality disorder, where the true self is largely absent, individuals with BPD experience a competition between these two selves, resulting in feelings of emptiness and a reliance on external validation for identity formation. The false self in BPD serves to cope with internal voids and seeks external regulation, often through intimate relationships, but this reliance can lead to instability and impulsivity. Ultimately, the inability to integrate past experiences and maintain a cohesive self-narrative contributes to the ongoing struggle for identity and self-coherence in those with BPD.


Capitalism: Religion of Envy

Capitalism is founded on envy, not jealousy, and this relationship drives the system. Envy is a pathological manifestation of destructive aggressiveness, distinct from jealousy, which is constructive. Envy is engendered by the realization of some lack, deficiency, or inadequacy in oneself, and it is a perpetual mobile that feeds on itself. The playing field in capitalism is heavily skewed and biased, and laws that were supposed to have amended or corrected justice and equity are not being implemented because politicians are in the pocket of the rich.


Narcissist's Language as Weapon

Narcissists use language as a weapon of self-defense, to obscure, not to communicate, and to obtain narcissistic supply. They talk at others or lecture them, exchange subtexts, and spawn private languages, prejudices, superstitions, conspiracy theories, rumors, phobias, and hysterias. The rules that govern the narcissist universe are loopholeed, incomprehensible, open to interpretation so wide and so self-contradictory that it renders them meaningless. The narcissist, in this respect, is a great social menace, undermining language itself.


Cold Empathy Garners Narcissistic Supply (Edwin Rutsch and Sam Vaknin)

Sam Vaknin and a guest discuss the relationship between empathy and narcissism, with Sam suggesting that narcissists have "cold empathy" due to childhood trauma and abuse. They also discuss how society is becoming more narcissistic as a reaction to being overwhelmed with pain and an overload of pain in the media. Sam shares his personal experience of growing up in an abusive household and developing a delusional private world as a defense mechanism. He also discusses how empathic reflection and mirroring can provoke new ideas and enhance empathy, even in individuals who lack warm empathy.

Transcripts Copyright © Sam Vaknin 2010-2024, under license to William DeGraaf
Website Copyright © William DeGraaf 2022-2024
Get it on Google Play
Privacy policy